Commons:Deletion requests/2024/06/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
23 June 2024
25 June 2024
Deletion requests on 24 June 2024

June 24

[edit]

File:Grama sachivalayam.jpg

[edit]

Computer visualisation with invalid copyright, Alternate real photo with valid copyright File:గ్రామ సచివాలయంIMG20200307095249.jpg--Arjunaraoc (talk) 03:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weathervane at the Jolly Holiday Bakery Cafe

[edit]

Photos centering on the Mary Poppins-inspired weather vane at the Jolly Holiday Bakery Cafe (flickr: [1][2]) may be subject to COM:FOP US. Id est The FOP may not apply to three-dimensional artworks, like the weather vane seen in the photos. Rather any derivative, like a photo, of a 3D artwork is still copyrighted based on the artwork itself. --George Ho (talk) 03:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Navadurga.jpg

[edit]

The source of the picture in the upper middle position is unknown. Thyj (talk) 03:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tagui as Lisa Imai at CWT57 20210328c.jpg

[edit]

Subject of photo requests deletion. "Please delete the photo, thank you." Johnj1995 (talk) 04:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnj1995: Tagui43 did not state in their edit that they are the subject of the photo. Do you have more information from somewhere other than Wikimedia Commons? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BethesdaMarylandChevyChaseHigh.jpg

[edit]

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that many of @LeeMelonsCat's uploads are similar to this, and should probably be considered together. They're nice aerial photographs, so it'd be worthwhile to determine if LeeMelonsCat has any relation to Duane Lempke and might be able to release the rights. Lempke's website lists the contact email address as [email protected]. Sdkb talk 16:53, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wdprb-hu.pdf

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 04:51, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a formatted libre book about programming basics – Hungarian version illustration FOR EDUTCATIONAL PURPOSE under CC-BY-SA for maturation students!
https://oercommons.org/courseware/lesson/89102 SZERVÁC Attila (talk) 05:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This content would probably be a better fit for the Hungarian Wikibooks project, as editable wiki pages within that project. Uploading this content to Commons as a PDF is not ideal, as it cannot be easily revised or extended by other users in that format. Omphalographer (talk) 20:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NJ Assembly1844.svg

[edit]

Uploaded a newer version with slight modifications EthanPKaiser (talk) 05:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RogerGarrison.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Pretzelles as no permission (No permission since) Krd 05:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BSicon tSTR carrot+GRZq.svg

[edit]

Duplicate of   (tSTR+GRZq carrot) but with incorrectly spelled name (colour should come after "+GRZq") OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 06:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BSicon tSTR red+GRZq.svg

[edit]

Duplicate of   (tSTR+GRZq red) with incorrectly spelled name, colour should come after "+GRZq" OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 06:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DhadrianwaleNov2020.jpg

[edit]

https://tvpunjab.com/sit-investigates-from-bhai-ranjit-singh-dhadriyan-wale-on-bargari-case/ Yann (talk) 06:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by PioneerOutdoor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A mix of old photos claimed as own work. Some may be old enough to be PD but needs proper aging/sourcing to determine

Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:R Ritchie Robertson Boy Scout Band.jpg should be fine, as it is a image from 1921 taken in the US, and thus PD. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Same with the files from the piano company. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All the photos used were commissioned by Lester Cox or his personal secretary, Mildren McKee. I will source each the best I can, but I currently hold the rights to any of the photos taken as my father and I are currently the owners of what remains of the estate. PioneerOutdoor (talk) 13:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We own Ozark Motor & Supply today, and own the rights to, and have possession of the originals of each of the following:
File:Ozark Tractor and Implement Company Springfield MO.jpg
File:Lester E Cox and Ford Tractor at Kickapoo Prairie Farms.jpg
File:Lester E Cox and Eenst Breech and Henry Ford II at Kickapoo Prairie Farms.jpg
File:Kickapoo Prairie Training School Springfield MO.jpg
File:Lester E Cox.jpg
File:Lester E Cox Army Air Service.jpg
File:Martin Brothers Piano Company Springfield MO B.jpg
File:Martin Brothers Piano Company Springfield MO A.jpg
File:R Ritchie Robertson Boy Scout Band.jpg
The following photos are in my personal collection and have surpassed 28 years of non-renewal:
File:Ozark Airlines DC-9 Douglas Aircraft.jpg
The following files are in my personal collections, were commissioned by Lester Cox, and I personally have authority from CoxHealth to use and open into public domain:
File:Lester E Cox with Burge Hospital doctors CoxHealth.jpg
File:Lester E Cox Burge Hospital Neonatal CoxHealth.jpg
File:Burge Hospital CoxHealth.jpg PioneerOutdoor (talk) 13:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is good to hear. Then please write an E-Mail to COM:VRT so we can archive this information in our databases for future reference. PaterMcFly (talk) 18:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yugaswaram 2012.jpg

[edit]

The photograph predominantly depicts the cover of a non-PD/CC-BY work. Thus, this is a derivative work of a copyrighted work with non-compatible license for Commons. Also:

-- DaxServer (talk) 09:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jouko Guatemala.jpg

[edit]

Selfie that is out of project scope, portrays minors that did not consent, self promotion. Used for promo on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 09:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ortseingang Hart im Zillertal.jpg

[edit]

violation of right of naming (Thomas Eberharter), no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 09:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JavaScript mascot bliss.png

[edit]

Obviously made up by the uploader 154.47.112.58 22:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously made up by the uploader JSMonster (talk) 14:07, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply] 

- There is no official JavaScript mascot.
- This is a low effort image.
- Apparently personal fiction artwork, not official nor widely used mascot for JavaScript.
- Personal fiction artwork. Completely unknown and unheard of by everyone except its creator.
- Just a file created by the uploader, not used by others, no educational or informative value — Preceding unsigned comment added by JSMonster (talk • contribs) 14:12, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for dedicating your time to reviewing my creation and sharing your concerns. I am genuinely honored that my work has resonated with people worldwide, prompting thoughtful study and commentary. This global engagement signifies a level of success that is both humbling and gratifying.

I sincerely hope that your current nomination stems from the best interests of the Wikimedia community. I would like to address concerns raised in your previous nomination for the deletion of my images, which, as highlighted by user Infrogmation of New Orleans, was perceived as a "bad faith nomination" aimed at another user. Their exact words were "apparent bad faith nomination in attempted retaliation at another user who listed nominator's images for deletion". It's crucial to clarify that the removal of your files resulted from a community decision: members voted unanimously in favour of the removal. In our community, it's essential to refrain from attacking or stalking users across platforms, and seeking revenge is unacceptable behavior.

I acknowledge the points you raised, and even though none of them are valid reason for removal, I want to address them to provide clarity regarding the community's perspective. In the different files that I have uploaded you have listed slightly different reasons, but I will address all of the reasons your have included in every file for clarity.

You wrote in some images "Obviously made up by the uploader". Not only this is not a reason for removal, but I have made it quite clear that I am the original creator of the images. Not only I created them, but I also released them under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. I cannot see your point here.

You wrote "There is no official JavaScript mascot". First of all, I cannot see your point and how this fact relates to our case. In any case, I never claimed or implied it is "the" JavaScript mascot, I made it clear that is "a" mascot for JavaScript, my proposal, that has gained a lot of traction lately.

The mascot itself is the culmination of a years-long endeveour of mine to propose a JavaScript mascot to be used by the community. I have carefully considered my aspects for its design. It is based on an (unofficial) mascot for the Lisp programming language, reflecting the fact that JavaScript was influenced by the Scheme programming language, which is a Lisp. The aforementioned Lisp mascot, was created by Conrad Barski, and as stated in its website "anyone may use these freely for any purpose and in any way" ( [[3]] ). I have persoonally contacted Conrad Barski (who also happens to be one of my heroes, as I have read his Lisp books and followed his work for quite some time) by email to share my creation with him, and he as happy about it (I have included a screenshot of our discussion that can be seen at [[4]] ).

The mascot has garnered popularity and positive mentions, evident in its inclusion in Seeklogo's database, social media posts, and references in Google Bard's answers. The mascot's website receives significant traffic monthly. I will further elaborate and give a few examples, but more can be found online:

- One of the largest logo and icons sources, Seeklogo, has included all of the JavaScript mascot images in its database. https://seeklogo.com/free-vector-logos/javascript-mascot

- Developers have posted about it on X (Twitter). I will just inluce one link [[5]]

- The mascot's website [[6]] get hundreds (of even thousands) visitors every month.

- Even Google Bard in its answers states that this is an unofficial JavaScript Mascot used by the community (a screenshot of Bard's answer [[7]] ).

In conclusion, I firmly believe there are no valid grounds for the removal of any JavaScript mascot images I uploaded.

-- Mickwellington (talk) 21:29, 09 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Krd 21:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:JavaScript mascot bliss.png

[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Javascript mascot on Transgender Pride flag.svg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:JavaScript mascot React flag.svg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:JavaScript mascot holding Typescript flag.svg, etc.. This is an unused personal doodle, which is out of scope. Nutshinou Talk! 11:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean-Didier Berger.jpg

[edit]

gros doute sur la licence (ressemble à une capture d'écran) LucasD (talk) 13:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

En effet, c'est bien une capture d'écran que j'ai faite lors d'une réunion du Conseil de territoire de l'EPT Vallée-Sud-Grand-Paris, tenue en distanciel durant l'épidémie de Covid-19. Ca pose problème ? Si oui, ok pour la supprimer. J'en prendrai une de visu lors d'une prochaine réunion en présentiel. Arpitan (talk) 15:10, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frank Silva.jpg

[edit]

This isn't Frank Silva who acted in David Lynch's movies Manissimus (talk) 16:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rajasekharan Parameswaran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope?

Trade (talk) 16:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 18:21, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Windows 11 Copilot.png

[edit]

This file is a screenshot from the Microsoft Copilot app. The app is copyrighted and it's copyright is owned by Microsoft Corporation. The details in the file claims it to be a Public Domain Logo. But, it's not a Logo. It's a screenshot. It's actually a copyright violation. HappyHappy2024 (talk) 17:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paintings by Kamal-ol-molk in the Golestan Palace by Mardetanha 7827 06.jpg

[edit]

Blurry photos. Sharp versions by the same photographer are available in the Category:Paintings by Kamal-ol-molk in the Golestan Palace Hanooz 17:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

Hanooz 17:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The team of the program "sustainable sanitation - ecosan" (4537027493).jpg

[edit]

photo not relevant. Was part of a batch upload. Also not sure if the people in this photo are OK with having their picture and names displayed in this way. This was my team when I worked at GIZ. EMsmile (talk) 19:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@EMsmile: I'm confused. This picture was published 14 years ago on Flickr, and was uploaded to Commons a decade ago. This seems a remarkably late date at which to say there is a problem with it on a personality rights basis. Were the people in the image unaware of it being published in 2010? - Jmabel ! talk 20:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They were aware that we would put the photo up in our Flickr collection (at SuSanA) but they were not aware that the photo and their names would be available in Wikimedia Commons later. I don't know if they would object to that, it's just another reason why I would prefer for this photo to be deleted. The main reason is that it really serves no purpose on Wikimedia Commons. The other photos from that batch upload were all about sanitation and toilets which is why the batch upload made sense for those photos but not really of this team photo. I don't feel super strongly about it but it would just be a waste of storage space and CO2 in my opinion EMsmile (talk) 21:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't save any storage space by deleting (it is always a "soft" delete, still visible to admins).
For what it's worth -- and I realize this is water under the bridge -- if someone posting to Flickr did not want the picture reused freely, they certainly should not have granted a CC-BY license (which I see is still offered at the source on Flickr). - Jmabel ! talk 22:57, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it was an oversight at the time, as we did that batch upload of about 10,000 photos of sanitation projects and toilets from our flickr photo collection to Wikimedia Commons. Those team photos were not really meant to be included but it would have been too hard to identify individual photos in that big batch. EMsmile (talk) 09:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Illustration of Sultan Hassanal Ibrahim in 1857.jpg

[edit]

Who made this painting and when? 186.174.103.123 20:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files created by Bulletv

[edit]

The user claimed himself to be the owner of the following files:

which is clearly false (e.g. File:Provincia di Zara-Gonfalone.png comes from it:File:Provincia di Zara-Gonfalone.png). --Horcrux (talk) 20:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: especially File:Provincia di Zara-Gonfalone.png comes from https://www.araldicacivica.it/provincia/zara-provincia-abrogata/ and it's under CC-BY-NC-ND as stated here. Arrow303 (talk) 12:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep the files of the anthems of the regions of Russia, since they are freely available according to Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Russia#PD_tags. 178.68.18.139 20:54, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/2024/06/24&oldid=904006547"