User talk:TheNuggeteer

Archives

Deletion discussion about Outline of Cebu[edit]

Hello TheNuggeteer, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Outline of Cebu, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outline of Cebu.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 13:19, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Piñon, Colorado[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Piñon, Colorado you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 15:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Afrique Victime[edit]

The article Afrique Victime you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Afrique Victime for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PerfectSoundWhatever -- PerfectSoundWhatever (talk) 16:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Ewiniar (2024)[edit]

Hi -- I've left a note at the Piñon, Colorado review about drive-by nominations, so I had a look at your other GA nominations to make sure it wasn't an issue there as well. For Typhoon Ewiniar (2024), you're a minor contributor; I think you need to post at the talk page and ask others if they think it's ready for GA and if anyone else wants to nominate. It's polite to agree among the active editors on the page who will actually nominate. If you prefer, you can just remove the nomination, or I can. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again -- can you let me know what you want to do here? I don't want to just remove the nomination without hearing from you. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Christie Sorry for the late reply, I messaged the talk page of the main contributor HurricaneEdgar, I'm going to wait for his response. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 00:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea; I added a bit of explanation to your note. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:15, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I went ahead and posted a note to the article talk page too, since there are a couple of other editors who are also significant contributors, in case they want to weigh in. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Morden (July 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Morden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheNuggeteer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Marcelino Libanan[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marcelino Libanan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 07:20, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Morden (July 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Morden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Marcelino Libanan[edit]

The article Marcelino Libanan you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Marcelino Libanan for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arconning -- Arconning (talk) 14:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog elimination drive 2024[edit]

Hi! I noticed that two of the articles in your totals list marked as "completed" still have the copy edit template. I just wanted to let you know in case you missed it! The articles are: 2018 Brazil truck drivers' strike and Sam Nunn. Kind regards, Pinecone23 (talk) 00:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pinecone23 Thank you for letting me notice! I removed both of the templates from both of the articles.

Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 00:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Happy copy editing! :-) Pinecone23 (talk) 00:30, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Piñon, Colorado[edit]

The article Piñon, Colorado you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Piñon, Colorado for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 13:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]