User talk:Reconrabbit

Your GA nomination of Domestic rabbit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Domestic rabbit you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Just realised that someone's been adding citation needed tags, so we're not quite done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

I've fixed all the citation needed tags. Many of them were on sections that were summaries of the upcoming subheaders, but I addressed it as requested. Some of these changes will probably have to be transcluded to Cuniculture in the future but I'll get to that later this week. Reconrabbit 02:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Good work, many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Domestic rabbit

The article Domestic rabbit you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Domestic rabbit for comments about the article, and Talk:Domestic rabbit/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Rabbit Shows

@Reconrabbit

Hello, I didn't want you to think I've forgotten about the rabbit show page. I've just been quite busy recently. I want to give the article a lot of focus when I am able and heavily expand it. I think it deserves a lot of attention and I hope to be able to do so this week. I already have some sources in mind as I have quite a few books on rabbits. Congratulations on the Domestic rabbit page! Thank you,

TanRabbitry (talk) 06:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fume hood

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fume hood you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JMF -- JMF (talk) 16:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fume hood

The article Fume hood you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fume hood and Talk:Fume hood/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JMF -- JMF (talk) 20:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fume hood

The article Fume hood you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fume hood for comments about the article, and Talk:Fume hood/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JMF -- JMF (talk) 15:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:1-Bromo-2,2-dimethylpropane

Hello, Reconrabbit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1-Bromo-2,2-dimethylpropane, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Super Lesbian Animal RPG

Hello, Reconrabbit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Super Lesbian Animal RPG, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on 1960s in fashion

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1960s in fashion, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on 1960s in fashion

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1960s in fashion, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Fume hood

On 7 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fume hood, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the energy cost of a single fume hood in Singapore can be up to $9,300? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fume hood. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fume hood), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Reconrabbit. Thank you for your work on Rodney Greenblat. Another editor, Netherzone, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating the article. He was best known as Rodney Alan Greenblat during his time as a visual artist. I think the article should be moved to that title.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 15:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

@Netherzone:, I created it at that title, but requested it to be moved to Rodney Greenblat because there are a lot of existing redirects there. I'm not so familiar with the requirements for common name titles that have middle names. If it's better that way, I can ask around and request a move back. Reconrabbit 11:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Not sure what is meant by this. Google N-grams shows that over the course of his career, he was mainly known as Rodney Alan Greenblat for over 25 years, but more recently has been called simply Rodney Greenblat. See link here: [1]

His website shows his name as Rodney Alan Greenblat. See link here: [2] as do all his social media.

Google search shows 103,000 hits for "Rodney Alan Greenblat" and 88,500 hits for "Rodney Greenblat".

My sense is that WP should honor what the person calls themself - and - what the majority of sources say.

I don't know that much about "lots of existing redirects" (possible the article was previously deleted?) but I do think that "Rodney Alan Greenblat" is indeed the correct title for the article. Perhaps you could ask the administrator who made your requested move if they could undo the current redirect?

Cheers, and thanks again for creating this. Netherzone (talk) 14:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Additional Titmouse Inc Edit Request

Hello User:Reconrabbit: Thank you very much for adding the edit to the Titmouse, Inc. regarding Star Wars: Galaxy of Adventures. Would you have a chance to review the edit requests I posted on March 21 regarding a few other Titmouse projects? It has been in the COI edit request queue for nearly four months. Thank you so much for considering this request! Best, JillTMouse (talk) 23:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello JillTMouse, I was planning on doing so but got sidetracked by one of a hundred different things here. There was one thing that was keeping me from putting the new info in to the article from your edit request - the constant use of "In 2022, [...]" to start sentences. Ideally the history should be written in a readable chronological order but not be presented like a timeline. I'll go into detail on the talk page with some recommendations. Reconrabbit 11:55, 9 July 2024 (UTC)