Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fuggerhs.png

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fuggerhs.png

Copyright violation. Upper part shows it's scanned from a book, but uploader writes it is made by him. Berthold Werner (talk) 08:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

The scan of the Fuggerhaus.png is not a fugging copyright violation, it is a scan of a photo I took. it is still legit and i hope you refrain from deleting this, for it would not be possible to shoot the house from this position again. trees use to grow, you know? --89.105.165.33 05:01, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Could you specify in what publication this photo was used? Can you explain why you did not make a scan of the original print? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Of course I can, it was used in a tourist information guide which is outdated now. Why would it matter why or how I scanned it? It simply seemed to fit in the article about my hometown. However, I could upload a newer and better (or both) version of this image, if you want me to. -- 89.105.165.33 23:13, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Because we are trying to establish that you own the original print and are not some random person who has simply scanned the image off a brochure he or she picked up. Yes, please scan the original print and upload it if you are able to. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 19:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

 Delete Uploader has not supplied any credible evidence for this being own work. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:39, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

---

Deleted. No evidence that

1. 89.105.165.33 is the uploader
2. that either of them is the photographer, or
3. that either of them still owns the copyright instead of the tourist guide.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC)