Talk:312 and 314 East 53rd Street

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Architecture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

312 (right) and 314 East 53rd Street (left)

• ... that 312 and 314 East 53rd Street (pictured) are two of seven remaining wooden residences on the East Side of Manhattan north of 23rd Street? Source: "314 East 53rd Street House" (PDF). New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission. June 20, 2000.
  • ALT1:... that the wooden houses at 312 and 314 East 53rd Street were completed just as fire codes in New York City prevented the construction of further wooden structures nearby? Source: "314 East 53rd Street House" (PDF). New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission. June 20, 2000.
  • ALT2:... that the wooden house at 312 East 53rd Street (pictured, right) became a New York City landmark in 1968 under its owner's urging, but its twin was not similarly protected until 2000? Source: Dunlap, David W. (June 18, 2000). "Little Wooden House Escapes the Ax". The New York Times.
  • ALT3:... that after twin New York City houses (pictured) were designated as landmarks 32 years apart, they were described as being "put back together, never to be separated again"? Source: Dunlap, David W. (June 18, 2000). "Little Wooden House Escapes the Ax". The New York Times.
  • ALT4:... that Edmund Wilson told F. Scott Fitzgerald that he enjoyed having "no doorman, no telephone" at 314 East 53rd Street? Source: Gray, Christopher (March 20, 1988). "Streetscapes: 312-14 East 53d Street; Twin Clapboard Rowhouses, But Just One Is Landmarked". The New York Times.

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Carillon

Created by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 16:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC).

• I'll pick this.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  16:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Passing all hooks, but I would vote for the ALT1  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  16:18, 14 May 2021 (UTC)