Talk:Bede

This  level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Biography: Military / Science and Academia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Christianity: Saints / Catholicism / Anglicanism Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saints (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Top-importance).

Middle Ages High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

North East England Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Translation studies High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Translation Studies, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to translators. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Historiography / British / European / Medieval

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force Military historiography task force British military history task force European military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Length of the year

World Almanac issues from the 1970s and 1980s state that the Venerable Bede announced in AD 730 that the year was too long (11 minutes 14 seconds excess - the actual year length being 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes, 46 seconds), though nothing was done about it until 1582, by which time the error was estimated to amount to 10 days. There does not seem to be anything about it in the article. GBC (talk) 06:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Pronunciation

We give "beed" as the only pronunciation but it is not even the correct pronunciation of his name, which is more like "beda", even if spelled as "bede". AFAIK, it's not until (late) Middle English that "bede" would be pronounced "beed", but I am not sure when that spelling came about. Seems to me like it was merely another way to spell a schwa at the end. "Beda" is used sometimes as a spelling today in fact (schools named after him). Is there some better way we can handle this so people see right in the first part of the lead what the correct pronunciation of the name is? —DIYeditor (talk) 18:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

To me this would be analogous to Goethe's pronunciation being given as "gewth", or Gödel's given as "gohdel", or Nietzsche given as "neechee". Surely, people do often pronounce them that way in English, but that is not how those names are properly pronounced. (Modern) English speakers may not be able to get those names exactly right, but equally well we shouldn't give a completely wrong pronunciation just because many people say it that way. Of course, we need to go by reliable sources. I am open to any solution to this which would put the correct Anglo-Saxon pronunciation closer to the beginning of the lead (or lede if you will). —DIYeditor (talk) 03:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Err, according to MOS:LEAD "In Wikipedia, the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents. It is located at the beginning of the article, before the table of contents and the first heading. It is not a news-style lead or "lede" paragraph."

Back to Bede, when reading Middle- or Old-English I was taught to pronounce every letter. If the scribe made the effort to write it then he did so because it is needed. For instance words like þone have to be pronounced "thonuh" (short o) to accommodate the metre of poems such as Beowulf. I've never seen Bede's name in a poem, but would agree that DIYeditor is probably right, it is bi-syllabic and my personal guess (ie not RS) is bed-ah. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 08:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

New pic in infobox

I think the medieval depiction looks far worse than the modern one and is just not nearly as good for the first image people see, especially when both depictions are imaginary. Does anyone agree/disagree? SaturatedFatts (talk) 02:26, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

I think the medieval one is fine, even though it's not contemporary. It's probably not far from what a contemporary depiction would have been. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

I like the current picture. Which modern one do you mean? —DIYeditor (talk) 03:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

This was the original lead image, which I moved further down in the article to the section on Bede's works. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 10:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)