Talk:Sic et Non
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||
 | Latin Low‑importance | ||||||
| |||||||
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work. |
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
[Untitled]
[edit]I thought that "sic" means "thus."205.188.116.135 01:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)Lestrade
- It does. But since Latin pretty much lacks an easy way to say "yes", "sic" also serves as so, thus, that is so, that is right or yes, as the need arises. - Nunh-huh 02:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
The page sorely lacks a link to any text of this work. I encourage any amateur translater to please post your work and link to it through wikipedia..128.208.36.173 21:05, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please also see Wikisource. -- Stbalbach 13:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
I believe the Latin exists in full but as far I have searched, all translations are commercial. What was the date of publication 1120? Surely a fair English translation exists. Can we get scans of one of the manuscripts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markbeaulieu (talk • contribs) 14:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
14 years later
[edit]Since a request was made to a see a full English translation of this text, and still nothing. Shameful. Why is a 900 year old thesis copyrighted?--~Sıgehelmus♗(Tøk) 21:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)