Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Garbisi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paolo Garbisi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Player does not qualify for WP:NRU as has played no professional or international games. Also for me does not qualify for WP:GNG as the player does not receive enough significant coverage. A large number of the sources are also trivial or have a close connection to the subject being from teams he has played for and their reliability can be questioned. Therefore I don't believe there to be significant enough coverage of the player as a few articles about him doing well for Italy U20s does not qualify him as being significant. Of the opinion that it is WP:TOOSOON and should be Draftied until he makes a professional appearance that qualifies him for WP:NRU. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 14:36, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 14:39, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 14:42, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In my opinion the article clearly meets the GNG, with sources such as these (among others): Allrugby (the main italian rugby magazine) or OA Sport (one of the main italian sport focused websites). And about the significant coverage, as per addressed in WP:GNG, it does not mean that there has to be a certain number of sources, but that there most be some sources that significantly cover the subject (theoretically even one good source would be enough for GNG, and the presence of other sources, primary ones or with trivial mentions doesn't change anything about that). And for the above mentioned sources there really seem to be no issue of reliability or independence. Furthermore the player has been selected in the last squad of the italian national rugby team, Italy arguably being one of the top 10 biggest rugby countries worldwide, which also clearly indicates a certain notability. For information, there was already a quite in-depth exchange on the subject of this page here. --Coco (talk) 15:01, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:21, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep there are lots of good quality sources in the article. Skeene88 (talk) 18:43, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.