Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 June 21

< June 20	June 22 >

June 21[edit]

File:Ankur Agarwal Mystery Boy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ankur Mystery Boy.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:25, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ankur Lightning Lamps Ngo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:25, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Parmod Gahlyan APgahlyan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Parmod Gahlyan at Kalkaji.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Email 003 2014.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused esoteric file. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah delete it. No problem. I should request a speedy earlier.--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 03:28, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beatles im only sleeping.ogg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Result is to reduce file length which has been done already. TLSuda (talk) 00:10, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per NFCC#3, at 21 seconds this file is too long. 18 seconds is the maximum for this track per WP:SAMPLE GabeMc ^{(talk|contribs)} 17:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If the sample is too long, than it needs reduction and not deletion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 08:43, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, nothing ever happens if a sound file is tagged for reduction. Too big non-free files can't be kept, and if no one attempts to reduce them, then we still need to delete the big copies. In that case, the article will be without any file until such time that the file has been reduced. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have shortened it to 19 seconds, but any more reduction would sound weird. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:57, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Engineer FR khan.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 18:30, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is needed to demonstrate his importance --Coolieguy (talk) 09:48, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no sourced critical discussion about what the the cover art looks like in the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:20, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the picture is to show the recognition he received --Coolieguy (talk) 16:13, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But the picture doesn't show any visual representation of the recognition and there is no sourced critical discussion about what the visual representation of the recognition looked like. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:04, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He was named construction man of the year. it shows that. the discussion "Khan was cited five times by Engineering News-Record as among those who served the best interests of the construction industry, and in 1972 he was honored with ENR's Man of the Year award" --Coolieguy (talk) 20:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The yellow banner in the top-right corner is replaceable by text. See WP:NFCC#1. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:49, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the picture will significantly increase the readers' understanding as it shows the recognition on the cover. Like the sculpture picture above in the article. --Coolieguy (talk) 21:07, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The picture doesn't provide any information about the recognition which couldn't be explained in text alone. It would also not be detrimental to the understanding of the article to remove the image. See WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FRKHan and graham.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem to be needed. See WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 18:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is needed to show them at work --Coolieguy (talk) 09:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no sourced critical discussion about what it looked like when they were at work. See WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:20, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.