Talk:Charles Darwin
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Charles Darwin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month. | This article is part of the||
Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page. | Charles Darwin is part of the||
Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biology | This article is part of||
Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation. | This article is within the scope of||
This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Top-importance). | ||
This article is listed on the project's core biographies page. | ||
This article has had a peer review which is now archived. |
WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shropshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Shropshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | ||
High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | ||||||||
High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. | |||||||
|
WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information. | Talk:Charles Darwin is part of||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page. | This ||
High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | ||
High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
This article is about a botanist or someone who contributed to the field of botany. |
Important notice: Some common points of argument are addressed at Wikipedia's Evolution FAQ, which represents the consensus of editors here. Please remember that this page is only for discussing Wikipedia's encyclopedia article about Charles Darwin. If you are interested in discussing or debating evolution itself, you may want to visit talk.origins. |
Small fix on the lead
[edit]Charles Robert Darwin FRS FRGS FLS FZS JP (/ˈdɑːrwɪn/ DAR-win; 12 February 1809 – 19 April 1882) was an English naturalist,geologist and biologist ...
There should be a space: naturalist, geologist ... 2804:14D:BE81:84F2:E081:8EEA:3208:A16F (talk) 23:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Done: well spotted, thanks! AntiDionysius (talk) 23:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Lede image
[edit]Wouldn't it be better to use this Featured image of Darwin instead of the current one?
GuardianH (talk) 04:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- The current article is fine. It includes the above image with a suitable caption (search for "between 1862 and 1866"). Johnuniq (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
1860 debate
[edit]The account here is the popular one, but it is probably apocryphal. Wikipedia has a page on this debate which gives a more accurate version. MirrorSquirrel (talk) 18:32, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Darwin's support for the inheritance of acquired characters
[edit]It should be made clear that in "The Origin" Darwin attributes several adaptions to what he calls "use and disuse" which involves the inheritance of acquired characteristics which is a component of Lamarck's theory of evolution. Currently the article mentions that three of Darwin's contemporaries (Robert Grant, Ernst Haeckel and Herbert Spencer) held Lamarckian views. It also describes one of Darwin's notes as dismissing as absurd the Lamarckian view of progression to higher forms. This gives the impression that Darwin had discarded Larmarckian thinking which is wrong. Darwin argues for Lamarckian evolutionary mechanisms in "The Origin" and even more so in the later editions and other subsequent published material. References:
"Darwinian evolution includes Lamarckian inheritance of acquired characters", International Journal of Epidemiology, Yongsheng Liu, Volume 45, Issue 6, December 2016, Pages 2206–2207 (https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw182) [This paper notes the (apparently) growing support for the inheritance of acquired characters today and suggests that Darwin was actually correct in his adherence to it]
"Lamarckism" in Encyclopedia Britannica (https://www.britannica.com/science/Lamarckism) [See the section titled "The influence of Lamarckism"]
It should also be stated in the article that Darwin did not understand that natural selection was responsible for species conformity (stabilizing selection) and this led him to articulate, in "The Origin" a confusing theory about variation being dependent on a change to the "conditions of life" (see the second sentence of "The Origin").
Reference: "Darwin on Variation and Heredity", Rasmus G. Winther, Journal of the History of Biology 33: 425–455, 2000 (https://philpapers.org/archive/WINDOV)
"The Development of Darwin's Theory" (book) by Dov Ospovat, Cambridge University Press [pages 77-83 (paperback edition) talk about Darwin's ideas on variation].
These two intimately related issues are interesting and noteworthy and, by including them in the article, will give a fuller, more balanced and more interesting account of Darwin. Failing to appreciate these points makes reading the Origin of Species a confusing exercise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gourdiehill (talk • contribs) 23:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Dave souza: Do you have any thoughts on this? To me, it seems a bit unnecessary to mention that 160-year old initial investigations concerning a ground-breaking theory might have had some rough edges. Is there something in the current article that is misleading? Is there a reason the reference in the article concerning the issue should be doubted? Johnuniq (talk) 04:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- The meaning of "Lamarckism" changed after Darwin's time, see On the Origin of Species#Developments before Darwin's theory: Charles Darwin's grandfather Erasmus Darwin outlined a hypothesis of transmutation of species in the 1790s, and French naturalist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck published a more developed theory in 1809. Both envisaged that spontaneous generation produced simple forms of life that progressively developed greater complexity, adapting to the environment by inheriting changes in adults caused by use or disuse. This process was later called Lamarckism. Lamarck thought there was an inherent progressive tendency driving organisms continuously towards greater complexity, in parallel but separate lineages with no extinction. .... Some anatomists such as Robert Grant were influenced by Lamarck and Geoffroy. This article rightly describes one of Darwin's notes as dismissing as absurd the Lamarckian view of progression to higher forms – Darwin discarded that central Larmarckian idea. Lamarckism#Darwin's pangenisis notes that CD proposed natural selection as the main mechanism for development of species, but (like Lamarck) gave credence to the idea of heritable effects of use and disuse as a supplementary mechanism. There's a case for a very brief mention of this, but the focus has to remain on concisely outlining Darwin's theory of natural selection. . . dave souza, talk 06:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- FA-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in People
- FA-Class level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in People
- FA-Class vital articles in People
- FA-Class history of science articles
- Top-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles
- FA-Class Biology articles
- Top-importance Biology articles
- WikiProject Biology articles
- FA-Class Evolutionary biology articles
- Top-importance Evolutionary biology articles
- WikiProject Evolutionary biology articles
- FA-Class biography articles
- FA-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Top-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- FA-Class biography (core) articles
- Core biography articles
- Top-importance biography articles
- Old requests for Biography peer review
- WikiProject Biography articles
- FA-Class England-related articles
- High-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- FA-Class London-related articles
- Mid-importance London-related articles
- FA-Class Shropshire articles
- High-importance Shropshire articles
- FA-Class Arthropods articles
- Low-importance Arthropods articles
- WikiProject Arthropods articles
- FA-Class Atheism articles
- High-importance Atheism articles
- FA-Class Geology articles
- Mid-importance Geology articles
- Mid-importance FA-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- FA-Class Environment articles
- High-importance Environment articles
- FA-Class Skepticism articles
- High-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- FA-Class plant articles
- Top-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants botanist articles
- WikiProject Plants articles