Talk:Mark Zuckerberg

Mark Zuckerberg is currently a Engineering and technology good article nominee. Nominated by MSincccc (talk) at 08:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Short description: American businessman and philanthropist (born 1984)

Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled.
See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account.

READ BEFORE POSTING:

This page is NOT a place for contacting Mark Zuckerberg. It is for discussing the content of his Wikipedia article. We Wikipedians cannot help you with any account issues on Facebook.
If you wish to communicate with Zuckerberg, then use email, physical mail, or send a message through social media instead.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Mark Zuckerberg. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Mark Zuckerberg at the Reference desk.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mark Zuckerberg article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWLArchives: Index, 1, 2, 3: 90 days

This

level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet Mid‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Internet culture High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

This article has been viewed enough times to make it onto the all-time Top 100 list. It has had 77 million views since December 2007.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2011.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Net worth conflicting information

The main article says he has a net worth of $111 billion. The box on the side (sorry, I know you all have a wonderful name for it, but I don't know what it is) says he has a net worth of $99.6 billion and both give "September 2020" as the date for the estimate. Which is it? 82.15.132.29 (talk)

MSincccc I did not want to start the GA review yet but I have some comments for improvement. Currently his net worth is quoted for a given day, I think that is good. However, he is listed behind several others. This list changes often and it is not particularity notable that the list had those members in that order on that day. I would remove the list and just leave it at "the fourth".

Arie Hasit's incorrect claim

Arie Hasit claims Zuckerberg's "FaceMash" put pictures of two males OR two females next to each other, but Zuckerberg said UNDER OATH during questioning that it was in fact "girls" whose pictures were being used this way.

GAN

Well I have significantly contributed to upgrading the article's quality. Furthermore, I am one of the article's top five authors and one of its all-time top editors. This fact coupled with my extensive knowledge about the article's subject has led me to nominate it for GAN today. I hope the others are not against my nomination. Regards and yours faithfully, MSincccc (talk) 08:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Philanthropist" in the first sentence of the lead

Per the arguments I laid out in WP:PHILANTHROPIST, can we move this out of the first sentence of the lead? While I have no doubt he has made donations of various sorts and this has received coverage, it is not his primary claim to notability, nor is it WP:DEFINING, making it inappropriate and WP:UNDUE to weigh it equal to his status as a businessman. It is also a non-neutral term, meaning it can only be used when the majority of the sources use it - and most of the sources in the relevant section of the article do not; they merely state that he has made donations. Characterizing them as philanthropy in Wikipedia's voice ascribes intent in a way that most sources do not. --Aquillion (talk) 03:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that philanthropy isn't the main thing Zuck gets noted for. However, I wouldn't go so far to call that adjective "a non-neutral term". The term doesn't inherently suggest someone is a good/bad person. You also appear to be imposing your own criteria for when to use it by treating your essay as a policy or guideline. Regardless, removing it from the opening sentence is fine, but not because of neutrality issues. The more relevant factor is how it's less prominent than his business endeavors. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Philanthropy

MSincccc "The money was largely wasted, according to journalist Dale Russakoff" - This is a POV claim. Is it actually notable, why should the reader care what this journalist thinks? It seems like the article should be making a non-POV claim detailing how the money was actually wasted. Is the thought here that the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative is responsible for capturing that? Czarking0 (talk) 06:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congressional Hearings Section is Missing Info

Libra

Is the congressional hearings section meant to be exhaustive? The way it is currently written gives the impression that those are all the times he testified before congress but the Libra testimony is missing Czarking0. If it is not meant to be exhustive what is the criteria for inclusion? It seems like any congressional hearing would be notable for a CEO. More sources:

Monopoly

he has also been questioned about monopoly/anti-trust law which is not covered https://neguse.house.gov/media/videos/rep-neguse-questions-mark-zuckerberg-facebooks-monopoly-power

(talk) 06:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FWD.us Ads

This sentence "in protest of Zuckerberg ads funded by FWD.us" does not make sense in context. What is a Zukerberg ad? The reader, myself included, has no idea. Maybe they are ads supporting Zuckerberg? Or written by him? Czarking0 (talk) 00:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Politics Proseline

The Politics section of the article is WP:Proseline I recommend creating subsections around the topics of note and expanding upon them. Czarking0 (talk) 00:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]