Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

(add request • view requests)

User:Xegma

• Xegma (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Hello there, I have created 30 articles as of now and i am requesting for Autopatrolled right. Xegma(talk) 07:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

User:C1K98V

• C1K98V (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. – Joe (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Roastedbeanz1

• Roastedbeanz1 (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I have written a total of 48 articles, including 6 in the past 2 days, mainly about hip hop artists. My articles usually have little to no issue. I'm requesting for the autopatrolled right to lighten the amount of unreviewed articles. Roasted; (talk), c. 00:07, 19 June 2023 (CDT)

 Not done, sorry. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wacotron looks like it's heading for deletion and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overtaxation of the United States was not that long ago. – Joe (talk) 09:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

User:IanTEB

• IanTEB (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

A patroller reccomended I apply for this. To be honest, I did not know it existed until now. I've created over 60 articles, which includes four GAs and a few more pending nominations. IanTEB (talk) 20:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 01:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

User:Horse Eye's Back

• Horse Eye's Back (t · th · c · del · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Because NPP is the first line of systemic bias on wiki, exempting even just my creations from NPP is an improvement. In my own experience NPP has been a net negative, while I'm sure it is useful in some cases at some point my article creations aren't those. My creation history is beyond reproach, I have even been solicitied to join NPP on multiple occasions but have repeatedly declined on ideological grounds (I don't join paramilitary organization like the NPP). Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done Rlendog (talk) 16:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

@Rlendog: This is your first edit to this page since 2009 and the first time you have ever granted a perm to another user, and it is to accept, without discussion or explanation, six minutes after it was made, a request for an exemption to NPP that calls it a "net negative" and "paramilitary organization". That's rather odd. Would you mind explaining what brought you here and your thought process in handling this request a bit further? – Joe (talk) 09:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I wholly share Joe's concerns here, even putting aside the extraordinary speed this was seemingly actioned, but to not challenge someone who clearly has some significant underlying issues with the page patrolling process seems to be an oversight. The appellant's expressed opinions on the process and their desire to bypass it entirely, with that rationale, warrants scrutiny. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

I reviewed several of his new articles and did not see any issues. Rlendog (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

I've also been familiar with this editor's editing for a while, and while I think there have been issues with some of his edits to noticeboards, I have not seen any issues with his new pages. Rlendog (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)