Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Prelitz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Prelitz[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR, or WP:BUSINESSPERSONOUTCOME. Google News shows some passing coverage in the context of local politics, but nothing approaching significant coverage in reliable sources, and shows no coverage at all of him as an author. Tagged for notability for 6+1⁄2 years. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 20:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, and Tennessee. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. (Appears) to have some sources, not sure how valid they are. https://www.google.com/search?q=Chris+Prelitz

DarklitShadow (talk) 00:31, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, $Salvio giuliano$ 22:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't even find something in this article that would imply he'd be likely to pass notability guidelines. It's not A7 level, but that's an extremely low bar. -- asilvering (talk) 01:39, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - doesn't pass WP:NAUTHOR. Just one entry in Google Scholar with only 2 citations. Article's Early life section is completely unsourced. The single reference in the article is an interview. Twinkle1990 (talk) 05:04, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete almost appears promotional or a linkedin bio. Nothing found for this person, beyond what's given in the article. Oaktree b (talk) 14:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.