|
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles | | Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles | |
|
|
Is it really necessary to have four separate pages, it's more useful to have this information on one page. Pbhj (talk) 01:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
- This was originally one page, but it became extremely large, and so was split. Marky1981 (talk) 21:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
- Was there a discussion about it? Did I miss something. It was large, OK, but why was it split. Pbhj (talk) 02:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
- There was no discussion, as I was the only person contributing to the page at the time, besides minor edits. There is (or was) a guideline to split articles which were getting long. Marky1981 (talk) 23:22, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
- Splitting pages are only necessary for for pages over 80kb. This list is 64kb total so a split was not needed. I don't see how anyone could argue that it is too cumbersome to edit or view either as you can access any letter from the top page and even edit each letter as well. That said, I boldly merged them back. Tavix (talk) 19:04, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
I know why Brooke's recent songs are referred to "Ligertwood" but within this article should be consistency. So which one do we choose? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.217.132.38 (talk) 15:41, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Professionally, Brooke is still using her maiden name. If this is her wish, then perhaps Ligertwood should be dropped. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.102.45.53 (talk) 21:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply