Commons:特色图片评选

COM:FPC

This project page in other languages:

跳转至评选区

此处的图片评选区交流主要使用英语，如果需要中文交流区，请前往中文维基百科的本地评选区。

特色图片评选

欢迎来到特色图片评选！社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一，即特色图片，每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻，也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云：“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像，请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识，图像就会成功入选。

这里列出了特色图片的评选记录，你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片：2004年、2005年, 2006年、2007年、2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年、2013年、2014年、2015年、2016年、2017年、2018年、2019年、2020 以及本月。

关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述，请参阅我们的年度评选。

你可以：

规范

投票周期为10天，之后的投票将无效。
欢迎匿名用户提名并参与讨论。
提名者可以随时撤回提名。
每个注册用户都可以投票，匿名用户的票将不统计。
如果提名5天后没有支持票，该提名将提前结束。
通过的标准：至少5个支持票，支持票与反对票比例大于2/1。
完成的投票保存在存档。
参见投票结束后操作指引。

提名

如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像，并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可，那么请按照如下步骤操作：

1. 按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg）在下方的文本框输入图像名称，然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。

如果本次提名为第n次提名，请按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg/2）展开操作。

所有的新图片集提名页面都应按照括号内的格式（Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My nomination）进行。

2. 按照编辑页面上的说明进行操作并保存页面。（注：打开编辑页面后，您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意为“这里是候选图片列表，请将您的提名提交到本节的顶部（在本行后）”；您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意为“不要在本行上方添加新的贴士（除了顶部）”。）

3. 点击此处并按如下格式在图片候选区的顶端加入新内容：

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg}}

推荐操作：请COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。

可选操作：如果您不是图像的创建者，请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“{{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~”（不含括号）。

注意，你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当！

光暗度

在讨论图像的光暗度的时候，投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示，它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个（甚至四个）圈子，那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子，你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数，故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话，也可以考虑把它打印出来。

色彩度

在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图，图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合，你则须要调校你的伽玛设置（在电脑的输出设置上，而不在于屏幕显示），直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难，然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意，在液晶显示（无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕）上观看图片，你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要，请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。

Featured picture candidates

File:Open front door over Wat Mixay and praying bhikkhus, Vientiane, Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 06:34:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deelerwoud, 09-05-2024 (actm.) 04.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Aug 2024 at 04:24:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Betulaceae
Info Deelerwoud, (the eastern part.) Split birch (probably due to lightning strike) on a heathland.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:035 African wattled lapwing incubating eggs in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 19:42:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus
Info African wattled lapwing incubating eggs in the Serengeti National Park. Created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great perspective, sharp detail, excellent light. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 03:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:25, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File: Darter August 2024-2.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 15:29:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata
Info A darter, probably a juvenile Crocothemis erythraea, resting on a clothes line. Notice how the wings are lowered for stability. Photo taken at Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unsual and dynamic pose, nice focus. --C messier (talk) 20:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

White hammer oyster - Malleus albus

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 14:41:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Right valve
Left valve

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Malleidae
Info The two valves of a White hammer oyster, Malleus albus; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 14:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:34, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Estornino soberbio (Lamprotornis superbus), parque nacional Serengueti, Tanzania, 2024-05-26, DD 66.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 06:11:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Sturnidae_(Starlings)
Info Superb starling (Lamprotornis superbus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but the back of the bird isn't in focus. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little Blue Fly-By.png

Voting period ends on 29 Aug 2024 at 02:08:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Egretta
Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Crop on left could be more wider for some px. --Mile (talk) 08:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I took your advice and went back to the original and re-cropped it and uploaded a new version. I think I may have done this wrong. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Проход в другой мир".jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 22:51:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Southern Federal District
Info Krasnodar Krai / Сreated by HoroshilovAleksandr - uploaded by HoroshilovAleksandr - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 22:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 22:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 07:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Exceedingly overprocessed. File name not in accordance with Commons:File naming guidelines. --Argenberg (talk) 19:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This image has a big wow factor, especially with the giant gap of light in the sky, the juicy resolution. I was hesitant to upvote because of a raster issue in the middle right of the sky. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DPP 3760-1.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 22:48:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
Info Kamchatka / Created by Козинцев - uploaded by Козинцев - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 22:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 22:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Its a cool photo, but the bottom appears to have a lot of digital artifacts and the mountain isn't really clear. It might be valuable for a page about the South Kamchatka Nature Park, but I don't know that it meets the criteria for FP. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Needsmoreritalin. Looks like it has compression artifacts. Such a pity. --C messier (talk) 07:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinson d'Afrique Jbel Serj.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 22:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It seems as if the bird is trying to remember something. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes lol El Golli Mohamed (talk) 07:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition, angle, lighting. Exquisite feather detail. Consistent with your style. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 07:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babosa de mar (Chromodoris gleniei), Zanzíbar, Tanzania, 2024-06-01, DD 30.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 20:03:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
Info Sea slug (Goniobranchus gleniei), Zanzibar, Tanzania. This nudibranch has been reported from the Maldives and Tanzania. It can reach 7 centimetres (2.8 in), but the are usually about 4 centimetres (1.6 in) long, and usually feed on sponges. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It doesn't look real! Cool shot and a very interesting subject too. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olivia de Havilland, actress, 1985.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:55:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Bernard Gotfryd - uploaded by TaurusEmerald - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Incredibly sharp for the time. -- ★ 13:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --August (talk) 14:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although there is little space on the left side of the photo (which can be rescued from the original scan) --Wilfredor (talk) 16:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Surely not "incredibly sharp for the time", but nonetheless very good. --A.Savin 19:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Does anyone know what kind of film this is? It looks like medium format because of the massive resolution. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good question. The description mentions “35mm (slide format)”, so it’s just full frame. It must be a slide/colour reversal film with low grain and high resolution, therefore a low ISO speed rating, probably 64; and it seems likely that Gotfryd used a Kodak film. Indeed both resolution and colours remind me much of Ektachrome 64 T, the tungsten film variant of the Kodak Ektachrome 64 film. Ektachrome 64/64 T was a very reliable film which survived the heat of an Egyptian summer as well as getting drowned in German rain showers without any colour shift. – 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Terreirão1.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:52:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Sun
Info created and uploaded by Lebobito - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 13:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 15:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice sunset image but IMHO not sufficiently impressive or unique enough to be FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cité administrative - tour en déconstruction (Colmar) (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:41:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue dasher (73146).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:01:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_(Chasers,_Skimmers,_Darters_and_others)
Info Immature male blue dasher (Pachydiplax longipennis). (Mature males are all blue and females are yellow and black throughout). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support So fuzzy! Not the image, the dragonfly. I never realized they has so many little hairlike structures. Well captured. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! Luc Viatour (talk) 16:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 19:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rawa (50065p).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 12:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Poland
Info While exploring Katowice I came across this lovely view behind a tram stop. From what I understand, locals don't like the Rawa -- it has a long history of being polluted, with one finding in the 90s that it only had 14% water -- but I quite like this overgrown urban scene. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice urban scene with a little “lost places” touch; demonstrates what misguided urban planning has done to our watercourses: instead of using them as recreational opportunities and urban oases, we have degraded them to sewers and ultimately harmed ourselves in the process. – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fontaine Trevi - Rome.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 10:24:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:040 Blue wildebeest with wattled starlings in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 09:04:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Important announcement : POTY scripts have been recently rewritten and an important discussion is ongoing to know if POTY rules should be changed or not. As many people as possible should vote on this page (click here), especially FPC users (just vote, no need for big text). Thank you for your time and I wish you all a beautiful day.
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:05, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support And they say that Wattled Starlings are non-migratory. I think they found a transportation loophole. Nice capture. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:28, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Question Are these birds parasites or do they eat ticks? --Wilfredor (talk) 23:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They eat ticks -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic capture! Very nice meeting place :-) DoF is a bit shallow (F/6.3) for this long focal length, as a result the head is slightly out of focus, unfortunately. However the birds are all very good with a satisfying level of sharpness. It seems that you gave the priority to action with high speed setting (1/2000 sec), that is totally understandable in this complex situation. And the resolution is generous enough, so that the image is awesome at lower size -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 19:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abstract spiral pattern (Unsplash).jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 07:10:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Building exteriors
Info created by Samuel Zeller, uploaded by Fæ, nominated by Yann
Support I am not sure if this is interior or exterior. Does anyone know this place? -- Yann (talk) 07:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exterior, I think it's the skylight on Basel's exhibition centre, rotated 90º: Google Maps Streetview --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Beautiful, great choice of black & white --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great, it looks like a 3D graphic at first glance! Julesvernex2 is right, I think the exact place where it was taken is probably about 60 meters further southwest, contrary to the coordinates given on the file page. It is a tram stop. Personally, I would not classify it as an interior shot. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, fixed. Yann (talk) 08:45, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support I am sure that the architect would be very happy with how you captured their work. Wonderful image, made more dramatic by choosing to shoot black and white. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 12:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:03, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Most other photographs of that skylight emphasize its symmetry, but by tilting the frame the photographer has created a stunning asymmetric composition. – Aristeas (talk) 15:30, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:02, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Different --Wilfredor (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:GLIB Feeding Young.png

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 19:50:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Plegadis
Info created by Chuck Homler - uploaded by Chuck Homler - nominated by Chuck Homler -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are no FP's of this species. -- Needsmoreritalin (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is nowhere near FP-level. I suggest you withdraw this nomination. Wolverine XI 21:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide more specific feedback? What about the image is problematic? Needsmoreritalin (talk) 23:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can do that, but I'm sleepy right now, so tomorrow. Wolverine XI 18:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Constructive criticism will assist me in nominating high quality images and in capturing better photographs. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I strongly disagree. --Zzzs (talk) 21:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you remind me when I asked for your opinion? Thanks. Wolverine XI 22:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please try to avoid escalating this into uncivil territory? I'm only replying because you mentioned that this image has terrible quality, which I disagree with. Additionally, you didn't specify why you think the image has poor quality. The nomination is currently passing in QIC, so I'm confused about why you believe this image has terrible quality. Zzzs (talk) 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's how I usually talk to friends and family; apologies if my language offended you. I don't know if I can say this in a polite way, but I don't necessarily take your opinion into account. Wolverine XI 18:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. I'll forgive you. However, I'll suggest to include a reason in your oppose votes so the author can use thr criticism to fix the image. Thanks in advance! Zzzs (talk) 22:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It looks tilted, otherwise fine to me. More information about the location would be good, too. Poco a poco (talk) 07:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting capture, really good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Talking about quality, it is very good. For FP - background failed you here, black on black, i can see upper part of bird since its covered. At least some white middle-bellow helped. Also, i hope you wont use 100+ MB for each photo, its around 24 MPx, do we loose so much on jpeg !? --Mile (talk) 08:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you are saying. I did shoot at f/4 (Prime lens at 500mm without TC) to focus on the eyes and face of the adult ibis and the exchange of food. As for the PNG, I did a quick check and it seems like I'm the only dork using it. I use PNG for lossless compression, preservation of image quality and colors. Wikipedia's suggestion is JPG, so moving forward I will post JPGs. But my previously uploaded images, already uploaded, may appear on FPC as .PNG.

Thank you for your thoughtful and considerate feedback. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 17:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Handling serpents at the Pentecostal Church of God. (Kentucky) by Russell Lee. - NARA - 541335.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 17:14:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1940-1949
Info created by Russell Lee - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Little bit of an odd image for here: I'd say it's oddly composed but very compelling. Passed En-wiki FPC easily, but Commons evaluates things differently. Vote as you see fit; I shan't take offense, but I would appreciate explanations, because, y'know, there's other images to consider, and having a good idea on how Commons stands helps with pre-filtering them. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive illustration of Pentecostal faith/superstition (depending on your own point of view). – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:BNR HQ 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Aug 2024 at 14:50:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#India
Info created by Rangan Datta Wiki - uploaded by Rangan Datta Wiki - nominated by Rangan Datta Wiki -- Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rangan Datta Wiki (talk) 14:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Probably the best possible view of this impressive 1906/1907 building (for some details, see e.g. this article). I like the contrast between the ambitious Indo Saracenic building and the modern Kolkata in the background. – Aristeas (talk) 10:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support But the file name could be better and the description is very poor of the --Llez (talk) 12:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alpsee 001.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 17:30:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 17:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 17:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral No wow. ★ 17:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same here, sorry Llez --A.Savin 19:26, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clingmans Dome Road in snow 06 April 2024 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2024 at 06:04:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States (this gallery has sections for states, but there is currently none for the state in which this image was taken: North Carolina)
Info created by AHeneen - uploaded by AHeneen - nominated by AHeneen -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as creator & nominator. There is a lot of detail in this image, but when viewed at 100% zoom, the sharpness should be OK. In my browser, the "original image" link on its page defaults to a much higher zoom (200%???) in which the sharpness of the trees is not the greatest. The rock face on the left foreground is naturally wet year-round and had a trickle of running water behind a layer of ice, which is why some of the ice against the rock face is dark while icicles hanging close to the rock face are bright from the sunlight shining through them. Image was taken in Nikon RAW format and only editing adjustments were to increase both highlight and shadow protection, increase overall brightness just a little, increase saturation just a little, and change white balance from "auto" to "natural light auto". -- AHeneen (talk) 06:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Really good composition. The sharpness could be better (f/8?) and a touch of CAs. --XRay 💬 11:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition, light, and mood. – Aristeas (talk) 17:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:09, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Very good composition. But I think it is over-sharpened. Is this intentional? --August (talk) 20:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. I'm not quite sure what you mean by over-sharpened. Isn't sharpness fixed when shooting? I disclosed the edits made to the image and the highlight/shadow protection was adjusted so there's more detail in hightlights (especially all the white snow in bright sunlight) and lowlights. AHeneen (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on your camera settings and your software when editing. Sharpening can be applied in both stages. August (talk) 22:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral A tad oversharpened. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Heavily over-sharpened. --August (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 12:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ναός Αγίων Σεργίου και Βάκχου στην Κοίτα 1096.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 18:12:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 18:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The byzantine church of Saints Sergius and Bacchus near Kitta, Mani, Greece. Support -- C messier (talk) 18:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice angle. ★ 22:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:09, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's impressive the high level of details. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 12:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Καβούσι και Αζοριάς 0153-Pano.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 17:28:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
View of Kavousi, the modern village down the valley, and Azorias, the ancient town lying in ruins on top of the hill to the right, in Eastern Crete, Greece. Support -- C messier (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent overview of the situation both of the ancient and of the modern village. The photo makes evident why the ancient settlers of Azoria selected that place: it’s easy to defend, still flat enough for safe building, not far away from (rather) fertile ground, and one can spot the approach of enemies very early. – Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Drones present an interesting trade-off. You have an opportunity to create an image that tells a story in a way that cannot be done while standing on the ground. This image succeeds in showing the terrain features, the two settlements and the bay. Unfortunately, most drones are like cellphones with wings. But the value of this image I think exceeds the shortcomings of the image sensor. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 16:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 19:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reflection Gemoor Khar Pond Lahaul Jun24 A7CR 01248.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 13:11:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info Gephan range on the right bank of the Bhaga River reflected in Gemoor Khar pond, Gemur, Lahaul, Himachal, India. Elevation 3,210 m (10,530 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 13:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the contrast between the reflective water and matte algae. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:35, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 22:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Renard roux Ichkeul.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 10:39:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:Canidae (Canids)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support What beautiful image --Wilfredor (talk) 13:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The hits keep coming from El Golli Mohamed. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 14:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you :) El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 23:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice and balanced composition. But the focus is not sitting exactly on the eyes (or sharpness is not that good). Additionally the resolution is medium to low. I can not find anything outstanding here. --August (talk) 10:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extremely beautiful canid. Wolverine XI 19:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful environmental portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 09:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloem van Anthemis lemon. 18-06-2024. (d.j.b).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 04:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Flower of a Anthemis lemon. Focus stack of 44 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. (Perhaps you could remove two stacking errors in the lower middle area, outside the petals on the green background.) -- Radomianin (talk) 10:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sorry, I didn't see those mistakes. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely level of detail. --C messier (talk) 05:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:07, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giant tarpaulin covering a road under construction at sunrise with a colorful sky in Don Det Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 25 Aug 2024 at 02:58:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:58, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual perspective, striking colours. --Tagooty (talk) 13:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tagooty – and for the fascinating folds of the tarpaulin. – Aristeas (talk) 17:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tagooty. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cincinnati Panorama of 1848 (definitive).jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 22:04:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1800-1849
Info created by Scewing - uploaded by LucaLindholm - nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not yet opened at full size but please fix the caption ("In this 2015 discussion you requested to retouch a little bit this awesome image... and here it is, just bettered (and even better categorized on Commons). Now the images are more continous, with quite the same lvl of light. What do you think about this new version?") No idea where this text comes from -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin Oh yes, of course.

I thought that the section “description” was to present the image here as a candidate, not the description for the image itself. XD LucaLindholm (talk) 14:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Too big to be opened. ★ 22:48, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ArionStar Mmh… I could take off a little bit of quality in order to lessen the file size, and then upload it on a different file page.

For now let’s concentrate on the img itself and the adjustments made on it. LucaLindholm (talk) 14:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I prefer the larger file as you can view smaller versions if it's too big, and zooming in to the full version lets you see some super cool things, like people in different areas of the panorama. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:56, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, a little bit “sizey”, but definitely worth it. :D LucaLindholm (talk) 14:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ever if need a massive restored version --Wilfredor (talk) 03:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a nice concept. And I liked seeing this. This should be promoted as VI. But the image is a badly / or not even stacked panorama. Doing this today and calling in panorama would not get any support. Additionally the individual frames are in poor condition and not well restored. --August (talk) 10:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the original was way worse. Unfortunately some little part are missing already from the original, because at the time the daguerrotype produced some black areas around the images. The frames theirselves are in the best condition possible for an image of that type and it is just that that is so good: zooming in let's you see so many particular detail that one wouldn't expect. LucaLindholm (talk) 18:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are right. The level of detail is outstanding. August (talk) 19:53, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per August. --Milseburg (talk) 11:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support While I do agree that the panorama is badly stacked, note that the image was taken more than 150 years ago. Unless there's a way better example around the same time, I think we should give it some slack. --Zzzs (talk) 17:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzzs exactly: I just took off the completely obscured areas with no visual info available. I really don't think there could be a better version than the one that is alrady available here on Commons, because I think that the then photographer thought it was already good in that way. LucaLindholm (talk) 15:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 08:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raspberries and blackberries from Srem, Serbia.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 11:00:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info Raspberries and blackberries from Srem, Serbia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 12:06, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:11, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pictures of food under-represented here, and good focus in this one -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor crop and bad orientation imo. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The former of what Shagil said. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:04, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor crop --Tagooty (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support To my eyes, it's the crop and the orientation that make this image work. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree it's more creative. Same style as Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dish of blueberries.jpg. In painting, artists also voluntarily crop sometimes -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support as Julesvernex2 --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:23, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't understand this crop. It doesn't reach the FPC standard. After all, this is just a picture a fruits on a table. Easy shot and bad crop. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:02, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop and composition, as well as plastic disposable containers --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oval portrait miniature of girl oil painting by Valentine Manchon Duchesne - with scale.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Aug 2024 at 01:14:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info created by Valentine Manchon Duchesne - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not a huge fan of the "1 cm" mark in the corner. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. @Urban Versis 32: I'm happy to propose the alternative below if preferred. But it's a useful scale, in my opinion (like here or here), otherwise you wonder what's special in this painting. It's difficult to figure out the proportions without any clue, as it could be a standard 20 by 30 cm, or larger. The scale is discreet in the background -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is true. It seems like most prefer the scale, however I will remain neutral on this one and support the alt. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 07:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. With scale info has strongest wow-facktor IMO -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:53, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per my above comments. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I’m fine with both versions. – Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas --Llez (talk) 10:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support fine with both -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info Version without scale -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this better. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:13, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my comments on the orig. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I’m fine with both versions. – Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas --Llez (talk) 10:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support fine with both -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:View in an easterly direction towards the Western Alps at the location of Grenoble.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 12:53:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France
Info created by Dktue - uploaded by Dktue - nominated by Dktue -- Dktue (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dktue (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It needs categories. Yann (talk) 18:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Zooming into the photo reveals oversharpening. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive and atmospheric mountain scene. However I agree that there seems to be some oversharpening of noise; it would be nice to mitigate this. Could it be related to tonemapping? Or to problems of the raw image processor with raw images from the Fujifilm X-Trans sensor – I remember having read about that in the past. @Julesvernex2: Can you say if the special ‘worm-like’ structures in the noise are related to problems with processing the raw image files from the X-Trans sensor? – Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, those indeed look like Fuji's notorious worms! Adobe's default raw engine does a terrible job with X-Trans files, but there's two ways to get around it: i) Use Adobe's Enhance feature (I see this image was edited in Lightroom's mobile version, not sure if it's already available there); or ii) use another raw processor (e.g., DXO or Capture One). Dktue, if you don't have access to Enhance/DXO/Capture One, I can demosaic the raw file for you and send you a linear DNG file for editing. Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dear users @Dktue, Urban Versis 32, Aristeas, Yann, and Julesvernex2: If no raw file can be provided, please feel free to use the edited file available at the SwissTransfer link for an update or a derivative. I have done an appropriate, lossless denoising. It would be a pity if this nomination would be burned due to technical problems. Note as per Yann: The categories should be improved. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Radomianin, great job in reworking the JPEG, looks much better! Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Julesvernex2: Thank you very much for the explanation and the hints how to handle this problem! @Radomianin: Thank you very much for your improved version – it looks indeed much better. @Dktue: I would suggest just to upload the improved version by Radomianin – this could also help to convince more voters of the photo – and to try Julesvernex2’s hints when this problem returns with further photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for editing! The enhance-details that ususally fixes the Fuji-X-trans-worms is not available on the iPad version of Lightroom. I uploaded the new version of Radomianin, thanks! --Dktue (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very moody capture. Thanks for using the improved version :) -- Radomianin (talk) 13:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good now! --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:29, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:49, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:View of Colosseo from Ponte degli Annibaldi.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 11:40:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual view of the Coliseum. ★ 18:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is the real Colosseo tilted like the tower in Pisa? --August (talk) 20:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I used several verticals as a reference point (modern verticals) and the coliseum seems to be slightly tilted but not as much as the pisa tower. The Colosseum is about 40 cm (16 inches) lower on the south side than on the north.[1] Wilfredor (talk) 21:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment OK, as someone who has never ben there, I can not tell exactly if something is wrong here. But I can say the the building on the left is leaning to the left. --August (talk) 21:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 22:21, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per ArionStar. -- Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:18, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition does not convince me. Croped cars also blown white car. Choped building on left - i would crop, it doesnt help to concetrate on vertical to Coloseum. --Mile (talk) 11:10, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Mile for your comment, I added a alt version based in this comment Wilfredor (talk) 03:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alt version

Info Thanks to Mile comment, I'm adding this alt version cuting the building and the cart, IMHO look more clean centering the Colosseo importance --Wilfredor (talk) 03:37, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think its beter than above, but will stay Neutral. Still see roof and light choped. Cloning probably would help. --Mile (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comment dear Mile, however, IMHO I think there is no way to take a street photo without cutting off a building or a car at some point. Wilfredor (talk) 12:53, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wilfredor I tried, and something like this , Coloseum must be more in sight, so more light and roand bellow less light, also removed roof, luster of left. You have space to sharpen it, so i did some. This was quick mode. I would enlight Coloseum even more. --Mile (talk) 15:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's right to remove permanent landscape elements like light poles. Wilfredor (talk) 15:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of Abraham Lincoln, Lincoln Memorial (2024)-L1005507.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Aug 2024 at 04:55:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The lighting makes it special for me. Excellent technical quality of the Leica. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Somehow. Tried BW and also one with LOW saturation and like them much more. I would put it in BW. --Mile (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I'd have fixed the perspective Poco a poco (talk) 13:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light. – Aristeas (talk) 18:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 17:43, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't understand the angle of view, the slanted base or the sharply plunging lines. --Stepro (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]