Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eurasian Tree Sparrow Head.jpg

File:Eurasian Tree Sparrow Head.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2019 at 05:43:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Eurasian Tree Sparrow Head.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eurasian Tree Sparrow Head.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Passeridae_(Sparrows)
•  Info All by me. I am willing to make any changed or crops necessary to gain the utmost satisfaction and approval. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 05:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support as nominator and photographer. Hopefully I can complete my personal challenge with this picture :) ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 05:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Update — Reduced sharpening artifacts 05:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Nice and sharp, good portrait. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Light could perhaps be nicer, but that's quite a closeup. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:31, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support A bit small after crop, but still good for FP. Nice quality. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:16, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:31, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:12, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment There's a visible halo-like effect bhind the neck and over the upper back. Also too light methinks. -- KennyOMG (talk) 23:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

• I believe that's residue from CA cleanup. Thanks for pointing that out. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 00:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

• Going to try to fix that now, hopefully it can be fixed... ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 00:11, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

 Update — Drastically reduced CA cleanup residue as pointed out by Kenny, and slightly increased contrast. 00:40, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

•  All past voters, King of Hearts, Ikan Kekek, Martin Falbisoner, Johann Jaritz, Llez, George Chernilevsky, Agnes Monkelbaan, Cayambe, Daniel Case, KennyOMG, you may wish to re-evaluate the image after the latest update. Details are above. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 00:40, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Seven Pandas (talk) 02:10, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - I changed my mind; it sucks now. :-) Just kidding! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: You got me a little on edge there ;) ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 02:33, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:06, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Cquoi (talk) 14:55, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
•  Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:05, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes