Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia sumergida de San Nicolás, lago Mavrovo, Macedonia del Norte, 2014-04-17, DD 11.jpg

File:Iglesia sumergida de San Nicolás, lago Mavrovo, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 11.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2017 at 18:09:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia sumergida de San Nicolás, lago Mavrovo, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 11.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia sumergida de San Nicolás, lago Mavrovo, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 11.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  Info Winter image of the submerged church of St. Nicholas, Mavrovo Lake, Republic of Macedonia. The church was built in 1850 and submerged in the local lake in 1953, but due to droughts in the 21st century it has largely appeared out of the lake.
•  Info created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Cool finding, thank you Kiril! When I planned to visit this place I was expecting to find something like this (it was middle of April) but instead I got there at the same time like a cold wave with this result. Driving with a summer tyres VW Golf was crazy but the views overwhelming...:) Poco² 18:40, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

• I remember that day with unusually low temperatures for the country in that period of the year.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose It's not very interesting and I find the featureless bright white foreground makes it unappealing. Charles (talk) 22:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Charles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
• Provisional  Support. Not a fan of the crop, suggested an alternative on the image page. Not exact but if you play with it you'll see what I had in mind (a positive diagonal for not only the slope but for the tree-church-hillside trio too - as well an excellent separation of these elements based on distance). I believe in this one. :) -- KennyOMG (talk) 17:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral (An ironic way to !vote considering the colors in the image ) I think the proposed crop could be even further improved by coming up about a sixth from the bottom. Support OK, I like this better. Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Ok, @Charlesjsharp, Ikan Kekek, Daniel Case, and KennyOMG: I applied a crop Poco² 19:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - The new version is much better, in my opinion. I've struck my oppose vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment The crop improves it in a way, but the balance is less good. Still not FP for me. Also, I'm not keen on the house being in the middle Charles (talk) 20:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't think the house-in-the-middle is a bad thing, but it's probably too low in the frame for it to work perfectly. Everyone's a critic here, I guess. -- KennyOMG (talk) 20:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - excellent technical quality and interesting enough to sway me into the support camp. Nicely captures the atmosphere of a departing snowstorm. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:39, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 05:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings