Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Temple aux six colonnes 03.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Temple aux six colonnes 03.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2016 at 13:19:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Tunisia
Info created by --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC) - uploaded by --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC) - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Support Seems very interesting, like a toy. Interesting light also. --Mile (talk) 15:11, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
overprocessed - appears unrealistic, even unreal --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Oppose
weak per Cart below --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:03, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
See below. Composition-wise this is the best you have shown us so far and I like it. The light and colors are also good. You are learning. :) Unfortunately it is very heavily processed, making it appear almost painted. I suspect you used the 'smart blur' or some similar function. You could try another version with just a little noise reduction. We all know that most night pics are a bit grainy so that would not necessarily be a problem. If that, plus a much better description of the photo, was fixed, I could consider changing to 'Support'. cart-Talk 17:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Oppose
Comment dear Martin Falbisoner really I admit that I used only the noise reduction and that becuase there is no loss of details with that but I reduced it now have a look please --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 20:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment dear cart-Talk really I admit that I used only the noise reduction and that because there is no loss of details with that but I reduced it now have a look please --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 20:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Weak support The description is good now and the pic is starting to look real so I'll actually give you my weak support. I would be even happier if you brought it back from that processing even a little, little bit more so that the temple looks just as real as the stones in front of it. :) cart-Talk 23:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Oppose per Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Oppose for quality reasons. I'm willing to accept lower quality on night photography than usual if it is the best that can be done under the circumstances. Here, you could have gone up to 15 seconds without star trails, which would allow you to reduce the aperture or ISO by some combination of four stops. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:58, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Support It is like I am watching a flim. --★ Poké95 03:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Support I like the composition and colours a lot; in this case, for me that overrides the technical shortcomings -- Thennicke (talk) 03:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment - This is a terrific composition, and I love the untraily stars. If you reduce the noise sufficiently, I will support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ikan, the first version of this pic was denoised and it made the sky look nice but unfortunately it made the temple look unnatural. Take a look. The noise of the sky is normal/acceptable now for a night shot (example). cart-Talk 07:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment - Thanks for filling me in on the history. I disagree with you and prefer the denoised version, even though it does look a bit artificial. I'd like to think there could be a more convincing way to denoise, though. Perhaps something toward the previous version but not all the way there? I don't consider this much noise to be OK in a Featured Picture, even one taken at night. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:16, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Comment dear Ikan Kekek and dear cart-Talk and dear King of ♥ ♦ ♣ and dear Daniel Case and dear Martin Falbisoner I added in QI right now the first picture taken in the site lot of detail and a realistic scene but there was not lot of stars so i chnged the place and the setting to have this one ... really I appreciate the conversation here and I wish that both of the photos please all the friends here ... If you accept let me revert the unrealistic one here and if the other one take the label QI I will nominate It too ... thank you again --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 13:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- As far as I'm concerned, I think you should leave this as it is. The mood, light, colors and crop is better in this pic and people seem to like it, so why complicate things. :) --cart-Talk 13:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- IssamBarhoumi, I agree with cart that you shouldn't edit the photo now, because as it stands, it is currently on track for a feature. Gaining my support and losing current supporters wouldn't be a good tradeoff. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Support lNeverCry 10:59, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Support Fantastic mood. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Tunisia