Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

Talk:Wonder Woman

Latest comment: 27 days ago by Trailblazer101 in topic Merge proposal of Diana Prince
This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:WikiProject iconComics: DC Comics Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by DC Comics work group.
Note icon
This article is a candidate to be the project collaboration of the month.
WikiProject iconFictional characters
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconClassical Greece and Rome Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAnti-war Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFeminism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLGBT studies
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen's History Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPopular culture (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconCulture Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPritzker Military Library Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.


Wonder woman

edit

Diana 49.207.228.138 (talk) 10:13, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Wonder Woman

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Wonder Woman's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ic5":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 07:07, 16 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Crossed out revisions

edit

3 revisions made on 29 december are crossed out and unavailable to view. The prev of the revision right above the 3 crossed out revisions is also unviewable. What were these revisions and why were they so bad that they had to be crossed out? Trimetwes fan1003 (talk) 07:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal of Diana Prince

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was the decision to merge

The purpose of the Diana Prince article has been questioned in the past at Talk:Diana Prince, although not much progress was made in regards to those efforts. I am here to propose that most of that article's relevant contents be merged into Wonder Woman and Wonder Woman in other media where applicable, because it is, broadly constructed, still focused mainly on the same character, just under a different name and another minor character who also used the name in the same comics before it was repurposed by the title Wonder Woman character. There is precedence for merging these secret identity articles in the past, namely with Talk:Superman/Archive 7#Proposed merge of Clark Kent into Superman back in 2020 and the Bruce Wayne redirect having been prevented from returning to an article.

As it currently stands, the Diana Prince article does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NFICTION. There is not much independent or significant coverage of this Diana Prince identity of the character that is separate from the main Wonder Woman character, and any coverage of Diana Prince I have seen is connected to Wonder Woman regardless. That article only cites 3 independent sources for this Diana Prince identity (a The Hollywood Reporter article, the book "Truly, Modly, Deeply: The Diana Prince Era", and a CinemaBlend article discussing aspects being incorporated into the film character in Batman v Superman).

It also includes "The Essential Wonder Woman Encyclopedia" as a ref, while the remaining 22 references are all DC Comics publications with no direct sources to back up the material being presented, and are purely being used to discuss the in-universe details of the Wonder Woman character using this Diana Prince identity, most of which are unsourced. This all falls under pure WP:FANCRUFT, and much of the contents can easily be incorporated into the Wonder Woman article and the article for her other media versions where necessary. There are several images here that could also merit some inclusion elsewhere, though I believe not all would remain. Trailblazer101 (talk) 06:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Trailblazer101 I agree with you, and since there are no objections, I'll proceed with closing the merge per WP:MERGECLOSE. However, regarding "I am here to propose that most of that article's relevant contents be merged into Wonder Woman and Wonder Woman in other media where applicable," could you clarify what specific content you think should be included in the "Wonder Woman in Other Media" section? Lililolol (talk) 23:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Roger that. I was thinking the contents from the "In other media" and "Diana as successful businesswoman" sections could be merged into the in other media article to not overload the main article. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:00, 28 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.