Abstract
Background
Confounding and exposure misclassification are issues that concern epidemiologists because of their potential to bias results of studies and complicate interpretations. In occupational epidemiology both are routinely raised to argue that an observed result is either a false positive or a false negative finding. Although it is important to consider the potential for limitations of epidemiologic investigations, judgment regarding their importance should be based on their actual likelihood of occurrence.Methods
This paper is based on our experience in epidemiologic analyses and a brief review of the literature regarding confounding and exposure misclassification.Results
Examples of substantial confounding are rare in occupational epidemiology. In fact, even for studies of occupational exposures and lung cancer, tobacco-adjusted relative risks rarely differ appreciably from the unadjusted estimates. This is surprising because it seems the perfect situation for confounding to occur. Yet, despite the lack of evidence that confounding is a common problem, nearly every epidemiologic paper includes a lengthy discussion on uncontrolled or residual confounding. On the other hand, exposure misclassification probably occurs in all studies. The only question is, how much? The direction and magnitude of nondifferential exposure misclassification (the type most likely to occur in cohort studies) on estimates of relative risks can be largely predicted given knowledge on the degree of misclassification, that is, relatively small amounts of misclassification can bias relative risks substantially towards the null. The literature, however, is full of discussions implying that misclassification of exposure is an explanation for a positive finding.Conclusions
These comments are not to suggest that all potential limitations for epidemiologic studies should not be considered and evaluated. We do believe, however, that the likelihood of occurrence and the direction and magnitude of the effect should be more carefully and realistically considered when making judgments about study design or data interpretation.References
Articles referenced by this article (37)
Retrospective assessment of asbestos exposure--I. Case-control analysis in a study of lung cancer: efficiency of job-specific questionnaires and job exposure matrices.
Int J Epidemiol, S83-95 1993
MED: 8132398
Title not supplied
Ann Epidemiol 2000
Title not supplied
Scand J Work Environ Health 1978
Dealing with the exposure variable in occupational and environmental epidemiology.
Scand J Soc Med, (4):147-152 1985
MED: 4089567
Title not supplied
ACS Symposium Ser 1994
Retrospective assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals in community-based studies: validity and repeatability of industrial hygiene panel ratings.
Int J Epidemiol, (3):635-642 1997
MED: 9222790
Comparison of crude and smoking-adjusted standardized mortality ratios.
J Occup Med, (12):881-884 1985
MED: 4087053
A philosophy for dealing with hypothesized uncontrolled confounding in epidemiological investigations.
Med Lav, (2):106-110 1995
MED: 7659036
Mortality of industrial workers exposed to acrylonitrile.
Scand J Work Environ Health, 25-41 1998
MED: 9714511
Show 10 more references (10 of 37)
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1002/ajim.20281
Article citations
Gingiva squamous-cell carcinoma in a non-smoking patient with occupational exposure to solvent siphoning using mouth: case report and literature review.
Front Public Health, 12:1370767, 02 May 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38756897 | PMCID: PMC11098034
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Occupational exposure to organic solvents and the risk of developing testicular germ cell tumors (TESTIS study): Effect of combined exposure assessment on risk estimation.
Scand J Work Environ Health, 50(5):359-371, 10 Apr 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38597023 | PMCID: PMC11245321
Incidence of De Novo Post-Transplant Malignancies in Thai Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center, Population-Controlled, Retrospective Cohort Study at the Highest Volume Kidney Transplant Center in Thailand.
Transpl Int, 37:11614, 26 Feb 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38468637 | PMCID: PMC10926888
Hearing Loss, Hearing Aid Use, and Risk of Dementia in Older Adults.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 150(2):157-164, 01 Feb 2024
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 38175662
Patient and Technical Factors Associated with Difficult Arterial Access and Ultrasound Use in the Operating Room.
Children (Basel), 11(1):21, 24 Dec 2023
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38255335 | PMCID: PMC10814054
Go to all (146) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Bayesian modelling of lung cancer risk and bitumen fume exposure adjusted for unmeasured confounding by smoking.
Occup Environ Med, 66(8):502-508, 05 Dec 2008
Cited by: 11 articles | PMID: 19060029
Implications of nondifferential misclassification on estimates of attributable risk.
Methods Inf Med, 41(4):342-348, 01 Jan 2002
Cited by: 5 articles | PMID: 12425247
Methodologic issues in using epidemiologic studies of occupational cohorts for cancer risk assessment.
Epidemiol Prev, 14(53):32-39, 01 Dec 1992
Cited by: 3 articles | PMID: 1341666
Assessment of exposure in occupational epidemiology.
Scand J Work Environ Health, 20 Spec No:19-29, 01 Jan 1994
Cited by: 22 articles | PMID: 7846489
Review
Bias in occupational epidemiology studies.
Occup Environ Med, 64(8):562-568, 19 Oct 2006
Cited by: 173 articles | PMID: 17053019 | PMCID: PMC2078501
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Funding
Funders who supported this work.