BBC Russian
Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Herbert et al. (Reports, 14 April 2006, p. 279) found that the rs7566605 genetic variant, located upstream of the INSIG2 gene, was consistently associated with increased body mass index. However, we found no evidence of association between rs7566605 and body mass index in two large ethnically homogeneous population-based cohorts. On the contrary, an opposite tendency was observed.

Free full text 


Logo of wtpaEurope PMCEurope PMC Funders GroupSubmit a Manuscript
Science. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 Jul 31.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC2719286
EMSID: UKMS4965
PMID: 17218509

Comment on “A Common Genetic Variant Is Associated with Adult and Childhood Obesity”

Abstract

Herbert et al. (Reports, 14 April 2006, p. 279) found that the rs7566605 genetic variant, located upstream of the INSIG2 gene, was consistently associated with increased body mass index. However, we found no evidence of association between rs7566605 and body mass index in two large ethnically homogeneous population-based cohorts. On the contrary, an opposite tendency was observed.

Herbert et al. (1) tested 86,604 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for an association with obesity in 694 individuals of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–Framingham Heart Study. They found that minor-allele homozygotes (CC) of the rs7566605 variant, located 10 kb upstream of INSIG2, had an increased risk of obesity (P = 0.0026). This finding was replicated in four separate samples of different ethnicity. However, we found no evidence of association between this variant and obesity risk in two large ethnically homogeneous population-based cohorts (n = 6599) aged 35 to 79 years.

We genotyped the rs7566605 variant in 4916 individuals (BMI 26.0 kg/m2 ± 3.7, 12% obese) of the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC) Norfolk study (EPIC5000) (2) and in 1683 individuals (BMI 27.2 kg/m2 ± 4.8, 22% obese) of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Ely study (3). All individuals were of Caucasian origin and unrelated. The association between BMI and the rs7566605 SNP genotype was tested using generalized linear models adjusted for age and sex. We first tested for association under an additive model, which assumes an additive effect for each additional minor allele. In post hoc analyses, we applied (i) the recessive model, which compares the CC homozygotes with G-allele carriers and (ii) the dominant model, which compares GG homozygotes with C-allele carriers. Analyses were performed for each cohort separately, as well as for the combined cohort (P value for heterogeneity between cohorts = 0.42). In the combined analyses, we adjusted for cohort in addition to BMI and sex and tested for genotype-by-cohort interaction. Sex-specific effects were tested by including a genotype-by-sex interaction term in the models.

The minor-allele frequency (C allele) is 32% in both cohorts. Genotype frequencies are in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P > 0.25) and similar to those reported for Caucasians in Herbert et al. (1). In contrast to Herbert et al., however, we found a tendency (P = 0.06) for the C allele of the rs7566605 variant to be associated with a lower BMI in the EPIC5000 cohort (Table 1). The association was significant (P = 0.02) under the dominant model [GG: 26.1 kg/m2 ± 0.08 (mean ± SEM); C-allele carriers: 25.8 kg/m2 ± 0.07]. No significant association (P = 0.61) was observed in the MRC Ely cohort (Table 2) or when both cohorts were combined (GG: 26.7 kg/m2 ± 0.08; CG: 26.5 kg/m2 ± 0.08; CC: 26.5 kg/m2 ± 0.15; P = 0.09). Also under a recessive model, as reported by Herbert et al. (1), no significant associations were observed (EPIC5000 P = 0.87, MRC Ely P = 0.48, combined P = 0.57). Furthermore, there was no evidence of sex-specific effects (genotype-by-sex interaction: EPIC5000 P = 0.30, MRC Ely P = 0.28, combined P = 0.14) or cohort-specific effects (additive model P = 0.69). Each cohort had sufficient power (>90%) to detect the genetic effects reported by Herbert et al. (1) under a recessive model and at a significance of 1%.

Table 1

Association between BMI and rs7566605 genotype and prevalence by BMI category in women, men, and all individuals of the EPIC5000 cohort.

nMeanSDSEP valueProportion of individuals with: BMI < 18.5; 18.5 ≤ BMI < 25; 25 ≤ BMI < 30; 30 ≤ BMI < 35; 35 ≤ BMI < 40; BMI ≥ 40
Females
CC26725.63.80.230.02; 0.49; 0.36; 0.12; 0.01; 0.00
GC118925.54.00.120.060.01; 0.51; 0.35; 0.10; 0.02; 0.01
GG128325.94.10.110.01; 0.47; 0.39; 0.11; 0.02; 0.01
Males
CC22626.33.10.200.00; 0.34; 0.54; 0.10; 0.01; 0.00
GC96826.23.00.100.600.00; 0.34; 0.56; 0.09; 0.01; 0.00
GG97826.43.20.100.00; 0.35; 0.53; 0.10; 0.01; 0.00
All
CC49325.93.50.160.01; 0.42; 0.44; 0.11; 0.01; 0.00
GC215725.83.60.080.060.01; 0.43; 0.45; 0.10; 0.02; 0.00
GG226126.13.70.080.00; 0.42; 0.45; 0.11; 0.02; 0.01

Table 2

Association between BMI and rs7566605 genotype and prevalence by BMI category in women, men, and all individuals of the MRC Ely study.

nMeanSDSEP valueProportion of individuals with: BMI < 18.5; 18.5 ≤ BMI < 25; 25 ≤ BMI < 30; 30 ≤ BMI < 35; 35 ≤ BMI < 40; BMI ≥ 40
Females
CC10326.65.10.500.02; 0.39; 0.44; 0.09; 0.03; 0.04
GC40427.25.60.280.320.01; 0.37; 0.38; 0.15; 0.05 ;0.03
GG40427.35.20.260.01; 0.40; 0.35; 0.16; 0.07; 0.02
Males
CC7727.64.10.470.00; 0.21; 0.58; 0.17; 0.03; 0.01
GC30627.33.60.200.600.00; 0.27; 0.52; 0.19; 0.02; 0.00
GG38927.34.20.210.01; 0.31; 0.47; 0.16; 0.04; 0.02
All
CC18027.04.70.350.01; 0.31; 0.50; 0.12; 0.03; 0.03
GC71027.34.80.180.610.01; 0.33; 0.44; 0.16; 0.04; 0.02
GG79327.34.80.170.01; 0.35; 0.41; 0.16; 0.06; 0.02

Despite replicated findings reported by Herbert et al. (1), we found no evidence of an increased obesity risk in minor-allele homozygotes in two large cohorts of Caucasian origin. On the contrary, we found a tendency toward a lower BMI in carriers of minor alleles, although the effect was small. We conclude that the rs7566605 variant is most likely not a major player in the genetic causes of obesity, at least not in Caucasian populations.

References

1. Herbert A, et al. Science. 2006;312:279. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
2. Day N, et al. Br. J. Cancer. 1999;80(suppl. 1):95. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
3. Wareham NJ, Byrne CD, Williams R, Day NE, Hales CN. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:262. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations
Jump to Data

Citations of article over time

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1126/science.1130012

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
5
62
2

Article citations


Go to all (60) article citations

Data 


Data behind the article

This data has been text mined from the article, or deposited into data resources.

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.


Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

Medical Research Council (3)

Wellcome Trust (1)