Abstract
Background
Confounding of mediator-outcome associations resulting in collider biases causes systematic error when estimating direct and indirect effects. However, until recently little attention has been given to the impact of misclassification bias.Objective
To quantify the impact of non-differential and independent misclassification of a dichotomous exposure and a dichotomous mediator on three target parameters: the total effect of exposure on outcome; the direct effect (by conditioning on the mediator); and the indirect effect (identified by the percentage reduction in the excess OR on adjusting for the mediator).Methods
Simulations were conducted for varying strength of associations between exposure, mediator and outcome, varying ratios of exposed to unexposed and mediator present to mediator absent, and varying sensitivity and specificity of exposure and mediator classification.Results
ORs before (total effect) and after adjustment (direct effect) for the mediator are both biased towards the null by non-differential misclassification of the exposure, but the percentage reduction in the excess OR is little affected by misclassification of exposure. Conversely, misclassification of the mediator rapidly biases the percentage reduction of the excess OR (indirect effect) downwards.Conclusions
If the research objective is to quantify the proportion of the total association that is due to mediation (ie, indirect effect), then minimising non-differential misclassification bias of the mediator is more important than that for the exposure. Misclassification bias is an important source of error when estimating direct and indirect effects.Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1136/jech-2012-201813
Article citations
Mediating effect of metabolic syndrome in the association of educational attainment with intervertebral disc degeneration and low back pain.
Heliyon, 10(9):e30272, 26 Apr 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38707474 | PMCID: PMC11068810
Exploring the causal relationship between female reproductive traits and frailty: a two-sample mendelian randomization study.
Front Physiol, 15:1349952, 28 Mar 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38606010 | PMCID: PMC11008284
Exploring the contribution of lifestyle to the impact of education on the risk of cancer through Mendelian randomization analysis.
Sci Rep, 14(1):6074, 13 Mar 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38480817
Mediating Factors in the Association of Maternal Educational Level With Pregnancy Outcomes: A Mendelian Randomization Study.
JAMA Netw Open, 7(1):e2351166, 02 Jan 2024
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 38206626 | PMCID: PMC10784860
Educational inequality in multimorbidity: causality and causal pathways. A mendelian randomisation study in UK Biobank.
BMC Public Health, 23(1):1644, 28 Aug 2023
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 37641019 | PMCID: PMC10463319
Go to all (47) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Quantification of bias in direct effects estimates due to different types of measurement error in the mediator.
Epidemiology, 23(4):551-560, 01 Jul 2012
Cited by: 35 articles | PMID: 22526092
Mediation analysis in epidemiology: methods, interpretation and bias.
Int J Epidemiol, 42(5):1511-1519, 09 Sep 2013
Cited by: 346 articles | PMID: 24019424
Review
Confounding of indirect effects: a sensitivity analysis exploring the range of bias due to a cause common to both the mediator and the outcome.
Am J Epidemiol, 174(6):710-717, 07 Jun 2011
Cited by: 32 articles | PMID: 21652602
Proper interpretation of non-differential misclassification effects: expectations vs observations.
Int J Epidemiol, 34(3):680-687, 31 Mar 2005
Cited by: 203 articles | PMID: 15802377
Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures.
Am J Ind Med, 50(3):199-207, 01 Mar 2007
Cited by: 145 articles | PMID: 17096363
Review