Abstract
Free full text
Clostridium difficile spore biology: sporulation, germination, and spore structural proteins
Abstract
Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive, spore-forming obligate anaerobe and a major nosocomial pathogen of world-wide concern. Due to its strict anaerobic requirements, the infectious and transmissible morphotype is the dormant spore. In susceptible patients, C. difficile spores germinate in the colon to form the vegetative cells that initiate Clostridium difficile infections (CDI). During CDI, C. difficile induces a sporulation pathway that produces more spores; these spores are responsible for the persistence of C. difficile in patients and horizontal transmission between hospitalized patients. While important to the C. difficile lifecycle, the C. difficile spore proteome is poorly conserved when compared to members of the Bacillus genus. Further, recent studies have revealed significant differences between C. difficile and B. subtilis at the level of sporulation, germination and spore coat and exosporium morphogenesis. In this review, the regulation of the sporulation and germination pathways and the morphogenesis of the spore coat and exosporium will be discussed.
Clostridium difficile infections
The Gram-positive, spore-forming strict anaerobe Clostridium difficile has become the leading cause of nosocomial diarrheas world-wide [1, 2]. Nearly 15% of all hospitalized patients treated with antibiotics develop antibiotic-associated diarrheas (AAD) [3], with ~ 20 to 30% of AAD being caused by C. difficile [1, 4]. The incidence of C. difficile infections (CDI) in some community hospitals is now greater than methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections [5]. The symptoms normally associated with CDI range from mild to severe diarrhea, which can lead to complications such as pseudomembranous colitis and toxic megacolon that carry mortality rates of ~ 5% [4]. The clinical symptoms are caused by the secretion of two large toxins, the enterotoxin TcdA and the cytotoxin TcdB, which cause massive damage to the epithelium and induce strong inflammatory responses [1].
The pathogenesis of CDI relies on the dormant spore morphotype. Because of the anaerobic nature of C. difficile, it is unable to survive in aerobic environments in the vegetative form [6]. During the course of CDI, C. difficile initiates a sporulation pathway that culminates in the production of a dormant spore, allowing C. difficile to persist in the host and disseminate through patient-to-patient contact and environmental contamination. Indeed, strains that are unable to form spores during CDI are unable to persist in the colonic tract of the host and be horizontally transmitted [7]. Because spores are metabolically dormant, C. difficile spores are intrinsically resistant to antibiotics [8], attacks from the host's immune system [9], and once shed into the environment, they are also resistant to bleach-free disinfectants commonly used in hospital settings [10].
Despite the critical importance that C. difficile spores play in CDI, our knowledge of C. difficile spore biology lags far behind that of other well-studied organisms such as Bacillus subtilis, the Bacillus anthracis group and Clostridium perfringens. This is due, in part, to the observation that less than 25% of the spore coat proteins of B. subtilis have homologs in C. difficile, making predictions difficult [11]. Moreover, no orthologs of the GerA family of germinant receptors are predicted for C. difficile, and even conserved components of the germination and sporulation pathways appear to be differentially regulated in C. difficile relative to C. perfringens and B. subtilis [12–17]. The C. difficile spore surface is even more divergent. The spore coat is covered by an additional surface layer, the exosporium, where only the Bacillus cereus group collagen-like BclA orthologs are conserved to some degree [18, 19]. In a proteomic study of C. difficile spore proteins, of the 336 detected spore-associated polypeptides [20], 54 polypeptides in the spore coat insoluble fraction have no functional homologs in other spore-forming bacteria [18]. Although little is known about the role of these outermost spore proteins, recent work has begun dissecting the role of some of these spore coat and exosporium proteins [21–25]. Consequently, in this review we discuss recent progress in the field of C. difficile spore biology, specifically on the processes of sporulation and germination, and spore coat and exosporium assembly.
Sporulation of C. difficile
During CDI, C. difficile initiates a sporulation pathway that produces the dormant spores that lead to persistence and dissemination of CDI within hospitalized patients. The signals that trigger C. difficile sporulation, in vivo or in vitro have not been identified, but they could be related to environmental stimuli such as nutrient starvation, quorum sensing and other unidentified stress factors [26]. In many Bacillus and Clostridium species, the decision to enter sporulation is regulated by several orphan histidine kinases that can phosphorylate the master transcriptional regulator Spo0A [26, 27]. The C. difficile strain 630 genome encodes five orphan histidine kinases (CD1352, CD1492, CD1579, CD1949 and CD2492) [28]. Inactivation of CD2492 reduced spore formation by 3.5-fold relative to wild type, while mutation of spo0A completely abolished spore formation [28]. During in vivo infection, these putative orphan histidine kinases were not up-regulated 4 hr post-infection, or later, suggesting that their expression levels is upregulated at an earlier time point or remain constant during infection [24]. Although the mechanism by which Spo0A is phosphorylated during the initiation of C. difficile sporulation is unclear, the absence of B. subtilis proteins involved in the transfer of the phosphoryl group from the histidine kinases to Spo0A (i.e. Spo0F and Spo0B), suggests that the phosphoryl group is transferred directly from the histidine kinases to Spo0A, as observed in Clostridium acetobutylicum [27]. To date, the only C. difficile orphan histidine kinase shown to autophosphorylate and transfer a phosphate directly to Spo0A is CD1579 [28]. The ability of the remaining orphan histidine kinases to phosphorylate Spo0A remains to be determined.
In B. subtilis, stimulation of the sporulation pathway results in a cascade of sporulation-specific RNA polymerase sigma factor activation (i.e., σF, σE, σG and σK) [29]. As these four sigma factors are conserved in Clostridium species, it was initially thought that the sporulation regulatory pathway was conserved and followed the B. subtilis paradigm [29]. However, recent genome-wide analyses have demonstrated that the C. difficile sporulation process lacks the criss-cross, intercompartmental communication between sporulation-specific sigma factors, as observed in B. subtilis (Box 1) [13, 16, 17]. These studies have revealed that in contrast to B. subtilis: (i) σF is required for the post-translational activation of σG; (ii) σE is dispensable for σG activation, (iii) σG is dispensable for σK activation; (iv) and σK does not undergo proteolytic activation in C. difficile [13, 16, 17, 30]. Moreover, the activation of these sigma factors during C. difficile spore formation does not appear to be governed by the same morphological cues as observed in B. subtilis, as σG activation does not require engulfment to be completed in C. difficile [13, 16]. Despite the observed differences in the regulation of the sporulation-specific sigma factor activity during C. difficile sporulation, relative to B. subtilis, Pereira et al. demonstrated that the sporulation sigma factors exhibit compartment-specific activation similar to B. subtilis, with σF and σG activity being restricted to the forespore and σE and σK activity being restricted to the mother cell [16].
Over 200 genes were identified by RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis [13] and microarray analyses [17] as being regulated by these four sporulation-specific sigma factors, and genes dependent on a given sigma factor have been assigned [13, 17]. However, the number of genes in each sporulation-specific sigma factor regulon for C. difficile relative to B. subtilis is striking, with σF regulating 25 vs. 47; σG 50 vs. 104; for σE 97 vs. 282, and σK, 56 vs. 147, respectively [13, 17]. While the inability to synchronize sporulation in C. difficile for these analyses likely reduce the detection of genes that are differentially expressed at low levels, these findings suggest that there may be substantial differences in the regulation of C. difficile spore formation relative to B. subtilis, especially since the phenotypes of a sigG mutant strains of C. difficile and B. subtilis differ significantly.
Notably, the regulatory pathway controlling sporulation in C. difficile also exhibits significant differences with the pathways described in other Clostridium spp. For example, in C. acetobutylicum and C. perfringens, σK activation appears to precede activation of σF [31, 32], which in B. subtilis [29] and C. difficile [13, 16, 17] is the earliest sporulation sigma factor to become activated. In addition, in C. acetobutylicum, σK functions at two discrete developmental stages during sporulation, a regulatory pattern not previously observed in any other sporulating organism [31]. Since the sporulation pathways of C. perfringens and C. acetobutylicum have not been fully defined, more differences are likely to emerge, particularly since C. difficile exhibits greater similarity to members of the Peptostreptococacceae family than to the Clostridiaceae family [33]. While the sporulation sigma factor regulons have not been defined for other Clostridium spp., these studies indicate that there is substantial diversity in the regulation and functions of conserved sporulation sigma factors in the Clostridia and the Bacilli.
C. difficile spore ultrastructure
The overall structure and morphology of C. difficile spores is similar to what has been seen in other endospore-forming bacteria (Box 2), but the outermost layers are particularly different. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of C. difficile spores [19, 21–23, 25, 34, 35] revealed that the spore coat has distinctive laminations (i.e., lamellae), which are similar to those observed in B. subtilis but different from those in members of the B. cereus group (i.e., B. anthracis) (Figure 1A, B) [36, 37]. It is remarkable that despite these structural similarities, only 25% of the genes encoding spore coat proteins have homologs in C. difficile, suggesting that the components that govern spore coat assembly are divergent to those defined for B. subtilis and/or the B. cereus group [11].
In members of the B. cereus group, the outermost layer is the exosporium, defined for these species, as a distinguishable spore layer with hair-like projections formed in the mother cell compartment, and that does not have a direct interactions with the spore coat layers that surround the cortex [38–40]. In C. difficile, the exosporium is the outermost layer. Thought the C. difficile exosporium has hair-like projections, it lacks many of the B. cereus group exosporium orthologues and the frequently-observed gap that separates the spore coat from the exosporium. Nevertheless, the C. difficile exosporium exhibits a conserved genetic signature to the B. cereus group, since the exosporium glycoproteins encoded by bclA1, bclA2 and bclA3 are also expressed in the mother cell (see below). The stability of the exosporium, remains a matter of controversy because several reports suggest that this layer is fragile and easily lost [21, 22], or absent in spores developed during biofilm formation [39], while other reports indicate that it is a reasonably stable layer that is only removed by proteases and/or sonication treatments [19, 23, 25, 34, 35]. The stability of the exosporium could be related to strain type or the use of proteases in purification procedures. Indeed, recent evidence indicates that proteinase K can remove the exosporium layer while leaving the spore coat intact [34]. Interestingly, the morphology of the exosporium seems to be strain-dependent (Figure 1A, B) [34, 35]. C. difficile 630 spores have an electron-dense, compact exosporium layer (Figure 1A), while spores derived from strains R20291, M120, TL176 and TL178 have a hair-like exosporium layer reminiscent of the B. anthracis exosporium (Figure 1A, B). Interestingly, the ultrastructural organization of the exosporium surface of R20291, M120, TL176 is identical to that of TL178 spores (Figure 1C), suggesting that the exosporium layer of C. difficile strain 630 may be an outlier among C. difficile strains.
While the roles of the outermost layers (i.e. spore coat and exosporium) on CDI and pathogenesis are unclear, recent reports have shed light on their potential functions. The C. difficile spore surface was shown to interact with unidentified surface receptor(s) of intestinal epithelium cells [25]. In vitro infection of macrophages with C. difficile spores revealed that spores become cytotoxic to macrophages possibly by disrupting the phagosomal membrane through spore surface-membrane interactions [41]. The exosporium layer was also shown to confer hydrophobicity to the spore surface affecting its adherence to inert surfaces [35]. C. difficile R20291 spores with a defective exosporium layer adhere better to Caco-2 cells than those with an intact exosporium layer suggesting a potential role in adherence to epithelial surfaces and in the transmission of CDI [23]. Removal of the exosporium layer also increases the ability of C. difficile spores to outgrow into colonies in vitro [34], raising the possibility that C. difficile spores lacking an exosporium are not only able to adhere better to colonic surfaces but also germinate more efficiently. The fraction of spores that have a firmly attached exosporium layer and the half-life of this layer in the environment remain to be determined.
Morphogenesis of the C. difficile spore coat and exosporium
In most endospore-forming bacteria, the first morphological event of sporulation is the formation of a polar septum, which produces a smaller forespore and a larger mother cell [26, 42] (Figure 2). Following forespore engulfment by the mother cell, the mother cell orchestrates the formation of the cortex, coat and exosporium layers [11, 42]. During B. subtilis spore coat assembly, the mother cell encases the forespore with a series of proteinaceous shells, which form the basement layer, inner coat, outer coat and crust layers (Figure 3). In B. subtilis, the formation of the first three coat layers are governed by the morphogenetic factors SpoVM, SpoIVA, SpoVID, SafA and CotE [42]. Homologs for SpoIVA and SpoVM have been identified in C. difficile [43], and C. difficile SpoIVA was recently shown to be essential for coat localization around the forespore similar to B. subtilis [44]. However, in contrast to B. subtilis, C. difficile SpoIVA was dispensable for cortex synthesis [38, 44, 45]. Despite the morphological similarities between the coat layers of C. difficile and B. subtilis spores [11], there are no homologs of B. subtilis SpoVID, SafA and CotE in C. difficile [43], indicating that divergent proteins likely functionally substitute for these morphogenetic proteins during C. difficile spore assembly. Indeed, Putman et al. identified a previously uncharacterized protein, CD3567, as a novel spore morphogenetic protein in Clostridia [44]. The C. difficile cd3567− mutant strain phenocopied the spoIVA− mutant strain in that coat assembly was mislocalized to the mother cell cytosol [44]. The C-terminal LysM domain of CD3567 was shown to directly bind with SpoIVA, suggesting that CD3567 (renamed SipL for “SpoIVA Interacting Protein L”) and SpoIVA form a complex that may drive coat assembly around the forespore [44] (Figure 3). Indeed, SipL may function analogously to B. subtilis SpoVID in helping to transition the spore coat from a mother cell proximal cap to full encasement [46–48]. TEM analyses of sporulating cells of sipL− and spoVID− mutant strains indicate that they exhibit a tethered coat phenotype, with the coat appearing to be loosely attached to the mother cell proximal pole of the forespore [44]. In B. subtilis, SpoIVA is required for the recruitment of the morphogenetic protein SafA, while both SpoIVA and SpoVID are required for recruitment of the morphogenetic protein CotE [42], yet given the absence of homologues of these proteins in C. difficile further research is needed to identify additional morphogenetic spore coat proteins recruited by C. difficile SpoIVA, SipL and/or SpoVM.
In B. anthracis and C. difficile spores, the exosporium covers the coat layers (Box 2 and Figure 3). As mentioned earlier, the C. difficile spore exosporium has a hair-like nap that looks scruffier and less organized than that of the B. anthracis exosporium (Figure 1). The C. difficile exosporium also lacks the clear gap/inner coat space observed in B. anthracis spores (Figure 1). Although the precise composition of the exosporium remains unclear, two recent studies have made some progress on the proteins required for exosporium formation (Table 1) [19, 23]. Three paralogues of the B. anthracis collagen-like glycoprotein (i.e., BclA) are encoded in the C. difficile 630 genome (i.e., bclA1 [CD0332], bclA2 [CD3230] and bclA3 [CD3349]). These proteins contain three domains: (i) an N-terminal domain of variable size; (ii) a collagen-like domain; (iii) and a C-terminal domain. [19, 49]. Recently, Pizarro-Guajardo et al. demonstrated that all three are expressed in the mother cell compartment and that the N-terminal domain of each BclA paralogue is sufficient to localize a tdTOMATO reporter protein to the surface of C. difficile spores during sporulation [19]. This finding is consistent with these proteins being under the control of σK [13, 17]. This work also demonstrated that BclA1 undergoes post-translational cleavage and localizes uniquely to the exosporium layer of C. difficile 630 spores with its C-terminal domain in an inward orientation (Figure 3) [19]. However, the precise role of the other BclA paralogues remains unclear.
Table 1
Germination encoded protein (locus tag, strain) | MWa | Spore localizationb | Function | Refs |
Putative cortex lytic enzyme (CD3563, strain 630) | 19 | ND | CD3563 mutant spores germinate as wild-type spores | [62] |
CspBA (CD2247, strain 630) | 125 | ND | Essential for processing of pro-SleC into mature SleC and spore germination; spores of a cspBAC mutant have >107 -fold lower viability than wild-type spores | [14] |
SleC (CD0551, strain 630) | 47 | ND | Essential for spore peptidoglycan cortex degradation and germination; spores of a sleC mutant had ~ 107 -fold lower viability in presence of taurocholate | [14, 62] |
CspC (CD2246, strain 630) | 61 | ND | Bile acid germinant receptor | [15] |
Spore structure/morphogenesis encoded protein (locus tag, strain) | MW | Spore localization | Function or observations | Refs |
SpoIVA (CD2629, strain 630) | 56 | Basement layer? | Essential for coat localization around the forespore and functional spore formation | [44] |
SipL (CD3567, strain 630) | 59 | Basement layer? | Essential for coat localization around the forespore and functional spore formation; sipL mutation reduces SpoIVA levels in sporulating cells | [44] |
CotA (CD1613, strain 630) | 34 | Exosporium | cotA mutation produces ~ 50% of spores with an amorphous structure; removed from the spore surface by sonication; essential for coat and exosporium formation; required for lysozyme, ethanol and heat resistance | [22] |
CotB (CD1511, strain 630) | 35 | Exosporium | cotB mutant spores exhibit wild-type ultrastructure; slight effect on heat resistance | [22] |
CotCB (CD0598, strain 630) | 21 | Coat and exosorium? | Putative manganese catalase, cotCB mutant spores exhibits wild-type ultrastructure; slight effect on heat resistance | [22] |
CotD (CD2401, strain 630) | 21 | Exosporium | Putative manganese catalase, cotD mutant spores exhibits wildtype ultrastructure; slight effect on heat resistance; sonication removes CotD | [22] |
CotE (CD1433, strain 630) | 81 | Exosporium | Putative peroxiredoxin chitinase, cotE mutant spores exhibits wild-type ultrastructure; removed from the spore surface by sonication; slight effect on heat resistance | [22] |
CotF (CD0597, strain 630) | 11 | Exosporium | cotF mutant spores exhibits wild-type ultrastructure; removed from the spore surface by sonication | [22] |
CotJB2 (CD2400, strain 630) | 11 | ND | ND | |
CotG (CD1567, strain 630) | 27 | Exosporium | Putative manganese catalase, no mutant; removed from the spore surface by sonication | [22] |
SodA, (CD1631, strain 630) | 28 | Coat | Putative superoxide dismutase, no role in heat, Virkon, hydrogen peroxide and ethanol resistance | [22] |
BclA1 (CD0332, strain 630) | 67.6 | Exosporium | Localizes to the spore exosporium through its N-terminal domain (NTD); SPk-treatment removes BclA1 from the spore surface.; oriented with its NTD and C-terminal domain (CTD) inwards and outwards, respectively; has a central collagen-like domain | [19] |
BclA2 (CD3230, strain 630) | 48.9 | Exosporium | Localizes to the spore surface through NTD; has a central collagen-like domain | [19] |
BclA3 (CD3349, strain 630) | 58.1 | Exosporium | Localizes to the spore surface through its NTD; has a central collagen-like domain | [19] |
CdeC (CD1067, strain 630; CDR0926; strain R20291) | 44.6 | Exosporium | Essential exosporium morphogenetic factor; SPk-treatment removes CdeC from the spore surface; required for the correct assembly of the spore coat cdeC spores have lower resistance, permeable spore inner membrane and a more hydrated spore core | [23] |
Barra-Carrasco et el. used genetic analysis to demonstrate that the cysteine-rich exosporium protein, CdeC (CD1067), which is unique to C. difficile, is accessible to antibodies and essential for the proper assembly of the exosporium of C. difficile spores [23]. A mutation in C. difficile cdeC dramatically reduced the abundance of the exosporium layer leading to defective coat and exosporium assembly. TEM analyses of cdeC mutant spores revealed that while the outer coat layer was thinner than that of wild-type spores, the inner coat layer was thicker than that of wild-type spores [23]. These observations suggest that CdeC could act as an anchoring protein at the interface of the spore coat and exosporium layers (Figure 3 and Table 1). Nevertheless, how CdeC recruits the remaining exosporium proteins is unclear. cdeC mutant spores also have a higher spore core water content and are more sensitive to ethanol and heat treatment than wild-type spores [23], indicating that CdeC might play a pleiotropic role during early spore formation. Further studies to define the pleiotropic role of CdeC during sporulation are warranted.
Several recent studies have also identified spore proteins that localize to the surface of C. difficile strain 630 spores (Table 1) [21, 22]. Surface localization of these proteins was determined by immunofluorescence and/or detection of the protein in the supernatant fraction of sonicated spores [22]. One group of these proteins consisted of proteins predicted to have manganase catalase activity; these include CotCB (CD0598, based on the 630 gene numbering system), CotD (CD2401) and CotG (CD1567) [21, 22]. Catalase activity was observed for the recombinant proteins of CotD and CotG, but was barely detectable for CotCB [22]. Since sonication of C. difficile spores abrogated the detection of CotD and CotG by immunofluorescence, these proteins may be localized to the exosporium or their presence depends on an intact exosporium [21, 22]. The precise location of CotCB could not be precisely determined, since the antibody generated appears to lack specificity [22]. CotD and CotCB are homologs of the B. subtilis outer coat protein CotJC, but no ultrastructural defects in the spore coat were observed in cotD and cotCB spores (Table 1) [22]. The function of C. difficile CotG (CD1567) is unknown [22].
Additional C. difficile spore surface-localized proteins with defined enzymatic activities include SodA (CD1631) (Table 1), a homolog of the B. subtilis superoxide dismutase (SodA), and CotE, a bifunctional peroxiredoxin reductase and chitinase. In B. subtilis, H2O2 plays a role in spore coat assembly by serving as a substrate for the SodA enzyme to crosslink tyrosine-rich spore coat proteins together [50]. However, loss of C. difficile sodA had no effect on spore ultrastructure or spore resistance [22]. The C. difficile CotE (CD1433) protein can be partially removed from the spore surface by sonication [22]. Despite the in vitro peroxidoredoxin reductase and chitinase activity, C. difficile cotE mutant spores have no obvious ultrastructural defects even though C. difficile CotE is predicted to be located in the exosporium (Table 1) [21, 22]. It should be noted that the C. difficile CotE bears no sequence or functional homology to the B. subtilis CotE protein, which is a critical outer coat morphogenetic protein [42] (Figure 3).
A third group of surface-localized proteins, consisting of three hypothetical proteins, has also identified and characterized. These include CotA (CD1613), CotB (CD1511) and CotF (CD0597, homologous to B. subtilis CotJB) (Table 1). Strikingly, C. difficile cotA mutant spores had an unusual phenotype; approximately half of the spores examined by TEM exhibited major morphological defects and lacked the electron dense coat layer [22]. In addition cotA mutant spores were also more sensitive to lysozyme [22]. These observations suggest that CotA plays an essential role in spore coat and exosporium assembly [22]. By contrast, no detectable differences in spore ultrastructure or resistance were observed in C. difficile cotB spores; the role of CotF remains to be investigated [51]. Detection of CotA, CotB and CotF was also removed by sonication, suggesting that they either localize to the exosporium of C. difficile 630 spores or require an intact exosporium.
The genes encoding the spore surface proteins identified to date [19, 21–23] have all been detected as being induced during sporulation in global transcriptional analyses [13, 17]. bclA1, bclA2, bclA3, cdeC, cotA, cotCB, cotD, and cotE genes were determined to be dependent on σK for expression. The cotG and sodA genes were identified as σG-dependent genes. Interestingly, cotB was identified as a σE-dependent gene, with a σE-dependent promoter mapped by Saujet et al. [17]. Since B. subtilis σE regulates genes whose products are involved in inner coat formation [26, 42], it is somewhat surprising that CotB was localized to the spore surface. Since σG activity is compartmentalized in the C. difficile forespore [16], the localization of SodA and CotG on the spore surface suggests the existence of mechanisms for transporting forespore-produced proteins across the membranes to allow for incorporation into the spore surface. While these studies [19, 21–23] have identified proteins required for the correct assembly of the spore coat and exosporium layer, further studies are needed to define the structural components of the outermost layers of C. difficile spores and the interactions between spore surface proteins.
Germination of C. difficile spores
Germination by C. difficile spores is an important step for initiating CDI [52]. Bacterial spore germination is induced when specific germinant receptors (GRs) sense the presence of species-specific small molecules (germinants). In Bacillus spp. and some Clostridium spp., binding of germinant to germinant receptors triggers the release of monovalent cations (H+, Na+, and K+) and spore core stores of dipicolinc acid (DPA) chelated to Ca2+ (Ca-DPA). In B. subtilis, Ca-DPA release leads to the activation of cortex hydrolases that degrade the peptidoglycan cortex layer, which allows for core hydration and resumption of metabolism in the spore core. In C. perfringens, activation of the cortex hydrolase, SleC, depends on its proteolytic cleavage by the Csp family of subtilisin-like serine proteases, CspA, CspB, and/or CspC, although C. perfringens strains exhibit variability in the number of Csp proteases that they encode [12, 53–55].
In contrast with Bacillus and Clostridium spores which sense nucleosides, sugars, amino acids, and ions (Box 3) [12], C. difficile spores germinate in response to the combination of specific bile salts [i.e., cholate and its derivatives (taurocholate, glycocholate, cholate and deoxycholate)] and L-glycine acting as a co-germinant [56–58]. However, some C. difficile strains are able to germinate in rich medium without taurocholate, suggesting that the mechanisms and/or specificity of the GR(s) are complex [59]. Since the genomes of all sequenced C. difficile strains lack homologues of the germinant receptors, a different mechanism likely initiates C. difficile spore germination. Indeed, a recent study by Francis et al. [15] demonstrated that CspC, one of the three Csp serine proteases encoded by C. difficile, acts as a bile salt germinant receptor (Table 1). Interestingly, C. difficile CspC (and CspA) is predicted to be catalytically dead, since two of the three catalytic triad residues (including, the catalytic Ser) are mutated in C. difficile [14]. Notably, a single point mutation in CspC (G457R) altered the germinant specificity of C. difficile spores [15] and allowed spores to germinate in the presence of chenodeoxycholate, which is a potent competitive inhibitor of taurocholate-mediated germination [60]. While the interaction of a germinant with CspC has not been demonstrated biochemically, these results provide compelling evidence that CspC is a bile salt-specific GR [15]. Notably, CspC is required for Ca-DPA release from spores in response to glycine and taurocholate [15], but whether CspC-induced Ca-DPA release is due to direct activation of DPA channels or activation of the cortex hydrolysis machinery is unclear.
Several studies have attempted to provide a quantitative measure of the interaction of C. difficile spores with bile salt germinants. In these studies, chenodeoxycholate inhibits taurocholate-mediated spore germination and appears to interact more tightly with C. difficile spores than does taurocholate [60]. This observation suggests that inhibitors of spore germination may have therapeutic value in preventing CDI. Indeed, Howerton et al. demonstrated that administering a potent inhibitor of C. difficile spore germination to mice prevents CDI [52].
The machinery involved in the degradation of the C. difficile spore cortex is similar to that found in C. perfringens spores in that the Csps and SleC are all essential for spore germination in C. difficile (Table 1) [14, 15, 53, 54, 61, 62]. However, the signaling pathway leading to SleC activation in response to germinant differs significantly between these two species. In C. difficile, the CspB and CspA serine proteases are encoded as a cspBA gene fusion, where the CspA portion of CspBA lacks an intact catalytic triad [14]. The CspBA fusion protein undergoes interdomain cleavage during spore formation, leading to the release of CspB species that is incorporated to the spore [14]; the level of CspB incorporation into the spore may depend on SleC [14]. Notably, the serine protease activity of C. difficile CspB is required for efficient processing of pro-SleC into mature SleC, since an S461A mutation in CspBA leads to a ~20-fold reduction in spore germination [14].
The precise signaling pathway that activates the C. difficile cortex hydrolyzing machinery starting from the recently identified bile salt germinant receptor CspC [15] remains unclear. Presumably CspC activates CspB upon sensing the bile salt germinant (Box 3). Activated CspB, in turn, likely activates the SleC cortex hydrolase. Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that SleC in vitro activity does not require proteolytic cleavage [63]. Further studies are needed to define the in vivo role of the cortex hydrolysis machinery as well as other components essential for Ca-DPA release from the spore core. For example, the role of the SpoVA proteins, which regulate Ca-DPA release in B. subtilis and C. perfringens [12], in C. difficile remains to be investigated. In summary, although the main components of the spore germination machinery of C. difficile have been identified [14, 15, 61, 62], further studies are needed to define the signaling pathway that synchronize these components during germination.
Concluding remarks and future perspectives
As C. difficile spores are essential for the persistence and dissemination of C. difficile infections, understanding the mechanisms by which spores are formed, germinate, and interact with host surfaces will be essential for developing strategies for disrupting C. difficile disease transmission and spread. Although some progress has been made in understanding the biology of C. difficile spore formation, many key questions remain unanswered (Box 4). It is expected that further work will allow us to fully understand the mechanisms that regulate the initiation of sporulation by identifying the proteins that can lead to Spo0A phosphorylation and orchestrate the activation of the four sporulation-specific RNA polymerase sigma factors. Further work is also expected to uncover the assembly mechanism of the spore coat and exosporium by defining the role of several spore coat / exosporium morphogenetic factors. Due to the relevance of spore germination for the progression of CDI, it is of interest to define how the novel taurocholate-GR, CspC, and the unidentified glycine GR are synchronized with the remaining germination machinery to regulate DPA release and cortex hydrolysis. Studies to define their in vivo role are essential for the successful development of alternative therapeutic strategies.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de Chile (FONDECYT Grant 1110569), by a grant from the Research Office of Universidad Andres Bello (DI-275-R/13), and by a grant from Fondo de Fomento al Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDEF) CA13I10077 to D.P-S. A.S. is a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences, supported by The Pew Charitable Trusts, and is supported by Award Number R00GM092934 and start-up funds from Award Number P20RR021905 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. The content is solely the responsibility of the author(s) and does not necessarily reflect the views of either the Pew Charitable Trusts or the National Institute of General Medical Sciences or the National Institute of Health. J.A.S acknowledges support by the American Heart Association National Scientist Development grant (No. 11SDG7160013), and support by Award Number R21AI07640 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2014.04.003
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc4098856?pdf=render
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1016/j.tim.2014.04.003
Article citations
The small acid-soluble proteins of Clostridioides difficile regulate sporulation in a SpoIVB2-dependent manner.
PLoS Pathog, 20(8):e1012507, 30 Aug 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39213448
Current and Ongoing Developments in Targeting Clostridioides difficile Infection and Recurrence.
Microorganisms, 12(6):1206, 15 Jun 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38930588
Review
Improvement of gram staining effect by ethanol pretreatment and quantization of staining image by unsupervised machine learning.
Arch Microbiol, 206(7):318, 21 Jun 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 38904719
Characterization of Clostridioides difficile Persister Cells and Their Role in Antibiotic Tolerance.
Microorganisms, 12(7):1394, 09 Jul 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39065162 | PMCID: PMC11279270
RelQ-mediated alarmone signalling regulates growth, stress-induced biofilm formation and spore accumulation in Clostridioides difficile.
Microbiology (Reading), 170(7), 01 Jul 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39028551 | PMCID: PMC11317968
Go to all (229) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
Assembly of the exosporium layer in Clostridioides difficile spores.
Curr Opin Microbiol, 67:102137, 16 Feb 2022
Cited by: 7 articles | PMID: 35182899
Review
N-Deacetylases required for muramic-δ-lactam production are involved in Clostridium difficile sporulation, germination, and heat resistance.
J Biol Chem, 293(47):18040-18054, 28 Sep 2018
Cited by: 11 articles | PMID: 30266804 | PMCID: PMC6254358
Clostridioides difficile Biology: Sporulation, Germination, and Corresponding Therapies for C. difficile Infection.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 8:29, 08 Feb 2018
Cited by: 77 articles | PMID: 29473021 | PMCID: PMC5809512
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Clostridium difficile Lipoprotein GerS Is Required for Cortex Modification and Thus Spore Germination.
mSphere, 3(3):e00205-18, 27 Jun 2018
Cited by: 23 articles | PMID: 29950380 | PMCID: PMC6021603
Clostridioides difficile Spore Formation and Germination: New Insights and Opportunities for Intervention.
Annu Rev Microbiol, 74:545-566, 01 Sep 2020
Cited by: 35 articles | PMID: 32905755
Review
Funding
Funders who supported this work.
NCRR NIH HHS (2)
Grant ID: P20RR021905
Grant ID: P20 RR021905
NIAID NIH HHS (3)
Grant ID: R21 AI107640
Grant ID: T32 AI007640
Grant ID: R21AI07640
NIGMS NIH HHS (4)
Grant ID: R00GM092934
Grant ID: P20 GM103496
Grant ID: R00 GM092934
Grant ID: R01 GM108684