BBC Russian
Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


Mendelian randomization (MR) is a technique that seeks to establish causation between an exposure and an outcome using observational data. It is an instrumental variable analysis in which genetic variants are used as the instruments. Many consortia have meta-analysed genome-wide associations between variants and specific traits and made their results publicly available. Using such data, it is possible to derive genetic risk scores for one trait and to deduce the association of that same risk score with a second trait. The properties of this approach are investigated by simulation and by evaluating the potentially causal effect of birth weight on adult glucose level. In such analyses, it is important to decide whether one is interested in the risk score based on a set of estimated regression coefficients or the score based on the true underlying coefficients. MR is primarily concerned with the latter. Methods designed for the former question will under-estimate the variance if used for MR. This variance can be corrected but it needs to be done with care to avoid introducing bias. MR based on public data sources is useful and easy to perform, but care must be taken to avoid false precision or bias.

References 


Articles referenced by this article (17)

  • The fitting of straight lines if both variables are subject to error WaldAThe fitting of straight lines if both variables are subject to errorAnn Math

    Wald

    Ann Math Stat Stat 1940


  • Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization BurgessSThompsonSGUse of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomizationInt

    Burgess

    Int J Epidemiol J Epidemiol 2013


  • Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies HarbordRDidelezVPalmerTMengSSterneJSheehanNSeverity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studiesStat

    Harbord

    Stat Med Med 2013


  • Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk EhretGBMunroePBRiceKMBochudMJohnsonADChasmanDIGenetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease riskNature

    Ehret

    Nature 2011


  • New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type diabetes risk New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type diabetes riskNat

    Dupuis

    Nat Genet Genet 2010


  • Bias in causal estimates from Mendelian randomization studies with weak instruments BurgessSThompsonSGBias in causal estimates from Mendelian randomization studies with weak instrumentsStat

    Burgess

    Stat Med Med 2011


  • Power and instrument strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using multiple genetic variants PierceBLAhsanHVanderweeleTJPower and instrument strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using multiple genetic variantsInt

    Pierce

    Int J Epidemiol J Epidemiol 2011


  • Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies BurgessSThompsonSGConsortiumCCAvoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studiesInt

    Burgess

    Int J Epidemiol J Epidemiol 2011


  • Birth weight and risk of type diabetes : a systematic review WhincupPHKayeSJOwenCGHuxleyRCookDGAnazawaSBirth weight and risk of type diabetes : a systematic reviewJ Am

    Whincup

    J Am Med Assoc Med Assoc 2008


  • The Estimation of Economic Relationships Using Instrumental Variables SarganJDThe Estimation of Economic Relationships Using Instrumental VariablesEconometrica

    Sargan

    Econometrica 1958


Show 7 more references (10 of 17)

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1515/ijb-2015-0074

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
1
63
0

Article citations


Go to all (48) article citations

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.