BBC Russian
Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


An objective index of inhaling cigarette smoke based on carboxyhaemoglobin concentrations and the carbon monoxide yields of cigarettes was used to investigate possible systematic differences in the extent of inhaling among light and heavy smokers when classified according to their self described inhaling habits. A total of 2108 men who smoked cigarettes were studied. Heavy smokers (20 or more cigarettes a day) had a higher average inhaling index than light smokers (fewer than 20 cigarettes a day) both among those who said that they inhaled and among those who said that they did not. This observation, together with indirect evidence that heavy smokers who inhale deeply may to some extent avoid depositing smoke condensate on their main bronchial epithelium, explains a hitherto unresolved anomaly--namely, that the risk of lung cancer is less among heavy cigarette smokers who say that they inhale than it is among those who say that they do not inhale.

Free full text 


Logo of bmjcredLink to Publisher's site
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Oct 29; 287(6401): 1273–1275.
PMCID: PMC1549753
PMID: 6416367

Inhaling and lung cancer: an anomaly explained.

Abstract

An objective index of inhaling cigarette smoke based on carboxyhaemoglobin concentrations and the carbon monoxide yields of cigarettes was used to investigate possible systematic differences in the extent of inhaling among light and heavy smokers when classified according to their self described inhaling habits. A total of 2108 men who smoked cigarettes were studied. Heavy smokers (20 or more cigarettes a day) had a higher average inhaling index than light smokers (fewer than 20 cigarettes a day) both among those who said that they inhaled and among those who said that they did not. This observation, together with indirect evidence that heavy smokers who inhale deeply may to some extent avoid depositing smoke condensate on their main bronchial epithelium, explains a hitherto unresolved anomaly--namely, that the risk of lung cancer is less among heavy cigarette smokers who say that they inhale than it is among those who say that they do not inhale.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (633K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1136/bmj.287.6401.1273

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
0
5
0

Article citations