Abstract
Background
Two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization (MR) incorporating multiple genetic variants within a meta-analysis framework is a popular technique for assessing causality in epidemiology. If all genetic variants satisfy the instrumental variable (IV) and necessary modelling assumptions, then their individual ratio estimates of causal effect should be homogeneous. Observed heterogeneity signals that one or more of these assumptions could have been violated.Methods
Causal estimation and heterogeneity assessment in MR requires an approximation for the variance, or equivalently the inverse-variance weight, of each ratio estimate. We show that the most popular ‘1st order’ weights can lead to an inflation in the chances of detecting heterogeneity when in fact it is not present. Conversely, ostensibly more accurate ‘2nd order’ weights can dramatically increase the chances of failing to detect heterogeneity, when it is truly present. We derive modified weights to mitigate both of these adverse effects.Results
Using Monte Carlo simulations, we show that the modified weights outperform 1st and 2nd order weights in terms of heterogeneity quantification. Modified weights are also shown to remove the phenomenon of regression dilution bias in MR estimates obtained from weak instruments, unlike those obtained using 1st and 2nd order weights. However, with small numbers of weak instruments, this comes at the cost of a reduction in estimate precision and power to detect a causal effect compared to 1st order weighting. Moreover, 1st order weights always furnish unbiased estimates and preserve the type I error rate under the causal null. We illustrate the utility of the new method using data from a recent two-sample summary data MR analysis to assess the causal role of systolic blood pressure on coronary heart disease risk.Conclusions
We propose the use of modified weights within two-sample summary data MR studies for accurately quantifying heterogeneity and detecting outliers in the presence of weak instruments. Modified weights also have an important role to play in terms of causal estimation (in tandem with 1st order weights) but further research is required to understand their strengths and weaknesses in specific settings.Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1101/159442
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall:
https://academic.oup.com/ije/article-pdf/48/3/728/29005355/dyy258.pdf
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1101/159442
Article citations
Invited Commentary: Detecting Individual and Global Horizontal Pleiotropy in Mendelian Randomization-A Job for the Humble Heterogeneity Statistic?
Am J Epidemiol, 187(12):2681-2685, 01 Dec 2018
Cited by: 110 articles | PMID: 30188969 | PMCID: PMC6269239
Genetic Regulation of PCSK9 (Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9) Plasma Levels and Its Impact on Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease Phenotypes.
Circ Genom Precis Med, 11(5):e001992, 01 May 2018
Cited by: 21 articles | PMID: 29748315
Inferring Causal Relationships Between Risk Factors and Outcomes from Genome-Wide Association Study Data.
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, 19:303-327, 25 Apr 2018
Cited by: 106 articles | PMID: 29709202 | PMCID: PMC6481551
Review Free full text in Europe PMC
Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases.
Nat Genet, 50(5):693-698, 23 Apr 2018
Cited by: 2830 articles | PMID: 29686387 | PMCID: PMC6083837