-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Robert T. Chen, Lauri E. Markowitz, Paul Albrecht, John A. Stewart, Lynne M. Mofenson, Stephen R. Preblud, Walter A. Orenstein, Measles Antibody: Reevaluation of Protective Titers, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 162, Issue 5, November 1990, Pages 1036–1042, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/162.5.1036
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
A school blood drive before a measles outbreak permitted correlation of preexposure measles antibody titers with clinical protection using the plaque reduction neutralization (PRN) test and an EIA. Of 9 donors with detectable preexposure PRN titer ⩽120, 8 met the clinical criteria for measles (7 seroconfirmed) compared with none of 71 with preexposure PRN titers >120 (P < .0001). Seven of 11 donors with preexposure PRN titers of 216–874 had a ⩾4-fold rise in antibody titer (mean, 43-fold) compared with none of 7 with a preexposure PRN titer ⩾1052 (P < .02). Of 37 noncases with preexposure PRN titer <1052, 26 (70%) reported one or more symptoms compared with 11 (31%) of 35 donors with preexposure PRN titers ⩾1052 (P < .002). By EIA, no case had detectable preexposure antibody; the preexposure geOlpetric mean titer of asymptomatic donors (220) was not significantly higher than that of symptomatic donors who did not meet the clinical criteria for measles (153) (P = .10). The study suggests that PRN titers ~120 were not protective against measles disease and illness without rash due to measles may occur in persons with PRN titers above this level.