Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

Phase transitions in cooperative coinfections: Simulation results for networks and lattices

Peter Grassberger, Li Chen, Fakhteh Ghanbarnejad, and Weiran Cai
Phys. Rev. E 93, 042316 – Published 26 April 2016

Abstract

We study the spreading of two mutually cooperative diseases on different network topologies, and with two microscopic realizations, both of which are stochastic versions of a susceptible-infected-removed type model studied by us recently in mean field approximation. There it had been found that cooperativity can lead to first order transitions from spreading to extinction. However, due to the rapid mixing implied by the mean field assumption, first order transitions required nonzero initial densities of sick individuals. For the stochastic model studied here the results depend strongly on the underlying network. First order transitions are found when there are few short but many long loops: (i) No first order transitions exist on trees and on 2-d lattices with local contacts. (ii) They do exist on Erdős-Rényi (ER) networks, on d-dimensional lattices with d4, and on 2-d lattices with sufficiently long-ranged contacts. (iii) On 3-d lattices with local contacts the results depend on the microscopic details of the implementation. (iv) While single infected seeds can always lead to infinite epidemics on regular lattices, on ER networks one sometimes needs finite initial densities of infected nodes. (v) In all cases the first order transitions are actually “hybrid”; i.e., they display also power law scaling usually associated with second order transitions. On regular lattices, our model can also be interpreted as the growth of an interface due to cooperative attachment of two species of particles. Critically pinned interfaces in this model seem to be in different universality classes than standard critically pinned interfaces in models with forbidden overhangs. Finally, the detailed results mentioned above hold only when both diseases propagate along the same network of links. If they use different links, results can be rather different in detail, but are similar overall.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
39 More
  • Received 3 December 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.042316

©2016 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

  1. Physical Systems
Networks

Authors & Affiliations

Peter Grassberger*

  • Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany and JSC, FZ Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany

Li Chen

  • Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany and Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany

Fakhteh Ghanbarnejad

  • Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany and Robert Koch Institute, 13353 Berlin, Germany

Weiran Cai

  • Medical Faculty and Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 93, Iss. 4 — April 2016

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×