Both President George W. Bush and Sen.
Whatever schoolboy lore says about
A few presidents were spectacularly wealthy, such as the nation's first president,
We estimate
Bush, the second son of a president to attain the office, made our list of the richest presidents partly based on his claim to a family fortune, but mostly because of a windfall on his investment in the Texas Rangers baseball franchise.
The Richest U.S. Presidents
It is difficult to compare personal wealth across historical periods, but below is our best estimate of the relative net worths of the richest five U.S. presidents. The rankings are based on our own calculations and extensive interviews with presidential historians.
Rank | Name | Party | Term |
1. | George Washington | None* | 1789-1797 |
2. | John F. Kennedy | Democrat | 1961-1963 |
John F. Kerry** | Democrat | NA | |
3. | Andrew Jackson | Democrat | 1829-1837 |
4. | Lyndon B. Johnson | Democrat | 1963-1969 |
5. | Herbert Hoover | Republican | 1929-1933 |
Kerry's in a situation somewhat similar to that of the original JFK. President Kennedy's father,
But Joseph Kennedy was, under campaign finance laws at the time, free to spend basically as he wished on his son's electioneering efforts, which he certainly did.
Here John Kennedy and candidate Kerry part company. Current federal law prohibits Teresa Kerry from donating more than $2,000 to her husband's campaign. Indeed, last December, when
In the course of this campaign, Kerry has received substantial money from thousands of individuals. More than 35,000 people have contributed the maximum $2,000, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. (Nearly 61,000 have contributed the maximum $2,000 to Bush.) The companies whose executives have given the most to the Democratic nominee include
But employees of Harvard University and the University of California have given far more than the bankers, media and software titans. For Bush, the most generous givers come from
The only lawful way for Teresa Kerry to have funded her husband's campaign is by buying "issue ads"--advertisements that advance a cause or theme. She also could have contributed unlimited sums to independent groups running their own issue ads. But neither has apparently occurred, leaving the senator to rely on his campaign's own resources, which are close to equal to that of the Bush campaign (see: "Dollar Vote Too Close To Call").
His--or her--own money has not been a factor.