To prove that some people actually read the article before commenting. Congratulations!What does TPM 2.0 and Windows 10 have to do with it? (the article subtitle)
It looks like it may have been inadvertently carried over from the article about League of Legends anti-cheat; which ran recently and had a TPM-related component.What does TPM 2.0 and Windows 10 have to do with it? (the article subtitle)
Really? What's the point of a map that's inaccurate? Seems like the height of irresponsibility, to me... all to "catch them all".I kinda love this passionate hacking so long as it doesn’t introduce any dangerous errors, like putting a beach blocking a highway.
We need an AI song: Open Street Map hacks, adding beaches to the maps, adding lakes to the mall, gotta catch em all!
I kinda love this passionate hacking so long as it doesn’t introduce any dangerous errors, like putting a beach blocking a highway.
We need an AI song: Open Street Map hacks, adding beaches to the maps, adding lakes to the mall, gotta catch em all!
Yeah, 2020 is a special case, because deep in pandemic times is when they introduced remote raid passes, which allowed you to participate in a raid (fight a mon, usually a legendary or other big critter) anywhere in the world, as long as you were invited to it. They made a ton of money with those things… which is why it’s baffling to see them nerf the passes last year (they limited how many you could use per day while simultaneously raising the price). And they wonder why their revenue has gone down since that point.I had no idea this game made so much money. According to that Statista article, it generated nearly a billion dollars in revenue in 2020. Insane.
Read the most upvoted response over at reddit, any new beach added now will not be reflected until 2026.
Edit, not sure why i am even being downvoted, the author even acknowledges this offhand:
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheSilphRoad/comments/1cimfl3/pok%C3%A9mon_go_players_invent_fake_beaches_on_real/
It takes years for Pokemon go to bring the OSM content into the game. Not that OSM updates are slow.I am an OSM contributor. When I add a fire service road in Southern California it is displayed within moments. The same for bus stops, 4-way stop intersections, petroleum pipeline markers, golf course details, aqueduct service structures, trees, scrub land, cliffs, marinas, beach boardwalks, etc. I can add streets and entire new subdivisions.
I regularly see open-space parks where there are really school athletic fields and enter a correction. Likewise for disc-golf courses that are added to places where they are not. Cemetery land use in the midst of residential areas (I assume to discourage the appearance of monsters and attracting the players who seek them).
The idea that it takes weeks, months, or years for things to appear on OSM is incorrect.
OSM itself is very live! What the article is talking about is how often PG pulls from it, which is a completely unrelated update frequency.I am an OSM contributor. When I add a fire service road in Southern California it is displayed within moments. The same for bus stops, 4-way stop intersections, petroleum pipeline markers, golf course details, aqueduct service structures, trees, scrub land, cliffs, marinas, beach boardwalks, etc. I can add streets and entire new subdivisions.
I regularly see open-space parks where there are really school athletic fields and enter a correction. Likewise for disc-golf courses that are added to places where they are not. Cemetery land use in the midst of residential areas (I assume to discourage the appearance of monsters and attracting the players who seek them).
The idea that it takes weeks, months, or years for things to appear on OSM is incorrect.
I guess I got the other title because I don't see any references to either. Or perhaps our ARS overlords put the title on the wrong article and fixed it afterwards.What does TPM 2.0 and Windows 10 have to do with it? (the article subtitle)
Are you saying pokemon go actually does use the current version of OSM despite what the article says and the article is incorrect?I am an OSM contributor. When I add a fire service road in Southern California it is displayed within moments. The same for bus stops, 4-way stop intersections, petroleum pipeline markers, golf course details, aqueduct service structures, trees, scrub land, cliffs, marinas, beach boardwalks, etc. I can add streets and entire new subdivisions.
I regularly see open-space parks where there are really school athletic fields and enter a correction. Likewise for disc-golf courses that are added to places where they are not. Cemetery land use in the midst of residential areas (I assume to discourage the appearance of monsters and attracting the players who seek them).
The idea that it takes weeks, months, or years for things to appear on OSM is incorrect.
Well reddit is a "source" of sorts... You know fake news, bad takes, public opinion that is based on likes etc...Because Reddit isn’t a source. Also, complaining about downvotes.
Nothing is perfect. Deliberately making things worse remains bad.Ummm, not to knock a product I love, but OSM accuracy isn’t perfect. This may even be the most adorable pen testing ever before a truly malicious actor introduces dangerous changes.
It's a side effect of them being garbage people.Yes, people are so passionate about Pokemon that they are hacking OSM. I don’t know that I’d consider it vandalism since the defacing isn’t the point. It’s a side effect of the biome hacking.
I suppose this is marginally more safe than attaching your phone to a ceiling fan to get your eggs hatched
Apparently by selling the real-time 24/7 mapping data from everyone who has it installed. This is a game that requires players to drive around (and fly places too) and also incentivizes allowing the game to run in the background constantly. I suppose in Tokoyo and New York one can take the subway but just walking certainly doesn’t cut it around here.I had no idea this game made so much money. According to that Statista article, it generated nearly a billion dollars in revenue in 2020. Insane.
I had no idea this game made so much money. According to that Statista article, it generated nearly a billion dollars in revenue in 2020. Insane.
I'm skeptical the game would even register the movement with such a small, fast circle. I think you'd have better luck with a toy train or Roomba.I had no idea someone would do something like this.
It sounds dangerous. Like your fan or your phone will break or both will break if things go wrong.
If I ever see one of those in my garden, I'll try to ring Kevin Bacon and/or Michael Gross, then I'm moving house.Andrew Cunningham said:Two of the latest additions to the Pokémon Go roster are Wiglett and Wugtrio, riffs on the designs of Diglett and Dugtrio, who live on beaches and look kind of like garden eels.
I, too, was wondering why Ars Technica had a sex toy on the front page.One a related topic, am I the only one who seems a massive Rule 34 violation in that "wiglett"? Heck, even the name is begging for a Rule 34 call...
At least in San Diego County, California there are a few of us who note when changes are made and verify that the change reflects truth. I can't say that people do the same in less populated areas.[ edit: see also the post immediately below.]As long as OSM accepts input from any contributor - without effective moderating or proctoring, and without a strong user base to continuously validate new inputs - their data will likely degrade over time.
They should consider themselves lucky that these Pokemon biome hacks fall under the category of "annoying mischief" and not "outright malicious intent". This was a minor use-case of finagling the OSM data. When someone discovers a way to monetize gaming this system, a lack of effective moderation could create serious headaches for OSM.
There's a system by which you can get notified of any edits made within a certain bounding box. Interested map editors often review edits being made in their local area and catch things like spam and vandalism pretty quickly. As long as there aren't any legitimate edits to the same feature to untangle, reverting any given change is so quick you might call it super easy, barely an inconvenience.As long as OSM accepts input from any contributor - without effective moderating or proctoring, and without a strong user base to continuously validate new inputs - their data will likely degrade over time.
They should consider themselves lucky that these Pokemon biome hacks fall under the category of "annoying mischief" and not "outright malicious intent". This was a minor use-case of finagling the OSM data. When someone discovers a way to monetize gaming this system, a lack of effective moderation could create serious headaches for OSM.