David G. Campbell

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
David G. Campbell
Image of David G. Campbell
United States District Court for the District of Arizona (senior status)
Tenure

2018 - Present

Years in position

6

Prior offices
United States District Court for the District of Arizona

Education

Bachelor's

University of Utah, 1976

Law

University of Utah College of Law, 1979

Personal
Birthplace
Salt Lake City, Utah


David G. Campbell is a federal judge on senior status for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Campbell joined the court in July 2003 after he was nominated by George W. Bush in March. He assumed senior status on July 31, 2018.[1]

Early life and education

Born in Salt Lake City, Utah, Campbell graduated from the University of Utah with his bachelor's degree in 1976 and his J.D. degree in 1979.[1]

Professional career

Campbell was a law clerk for Judge Clifford Wallace of the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit from 1979 to 1980, and also clerked for then-Associate Justice of the United States William Rehnquist in the Supreme Court of the United States from 1981 to 1982. Campbell was a private practice attorney in Arizona from 1982 to 2003. He was an adjunct professor for Arizona State University Law School from 1985 to 1986 and again in 1988. Campbell was also a visiting professor at Brigham Young University in 1990.[1]

Judicial career

District of Arizona

On the recommendation of Arizona U.S. Senators Jon Kyl and John McCain, Campbell was nominated to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona by President George W. Bush on March 13, 2003, to a new seat created by 116 Stat. 1758, which was approved by Congress. Campbell was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on July 8, 2003 and received commission on July 15, 2003.[2][3] He assumed senior status on July 31, 2018.[1]

Noteworthy cases

AZ denies Dreamers state ID's (2013)

See also: United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Arizona Dream Act Coalition, et al., v. Janice K. Brewer, Governor of Arizona, et al., US CV12-02546 PHX DGC)

Judge Campbell presided over a case where the issue was whether Arizona can deny driver’s licenses among immigrants authorized to remain in the U.S. under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Prior to the suit, Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona issued an executive order to state agencies directing them to stop Deferred Action recipients from obtaining eligibility for any state identification. The Arizona Dream Act coalition along with five individual plaintiffs sued, seeking an injunction that would bar Gov. Brewer’s order. In May of 2013, Campbell ruled that the injunction would not be granted, and the order would stand, though he also found the plaintiffs would be likely to prevail on their claim that their equal protection rights are violated by the Governor’s order. There are about 1.7 million people across the U.S. covered by the DACA program. Eligibility requirements include entry into the U.S. before age 16, enrollment in school or a degree, and no convictions on their record, among other requirements. The ACLU of Arizona, part of the coalition, appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.[4][5]

Petland puppy mill case (2010)

See also: United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Martinelli et al. v. PETLAND, INC. and Hunte Corporation, No. CV-09-529-PHX-DGC)

Judge Campbell dismissed a lawsuit against Hunte Corporation on February 3, 2010, after six pet owners alleged that Petland Stores who sold the puppies distributed by Hunte came from puppy mills. The judge dismissed the case over finding that the plaintiffs in the case failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hunte engaged in illegal conduct. The case was part of a series of cases filed by the Humane Society of the United States.[6]

Alleged sham Green Party candidates (2010)

See also: United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Arizona Green Party et al. vs. Ken Bennett et al., 2:10-cv-01902-DGC)

In September 2010, the Green Party requested that the names of nine candidates not endorsed by the party be removed from the general election ballots in Arizona. The lawyer for the Green Party alleged that the candidates were recruited by Republicans to restrict the number of votes that could have potentially gone to Democrats. As evidence, he presented the fact that the public positions of the candidates are contrary to the policies supported by his client, the Green Party. Judge Campbell ruled that removing the candidates from the ballot would not be fair to the candidates before a full hearing on the merits of the case had occurred. This, in effect, allowed counties in the state to print their ballots as planned.[7]

See also

External links


Footnotes

Political offices
Preceded by:
NA-New Seat
District of Arizona
2003–2018
Seat #13
Succeeded by:
Michael Liburdi