John B. Owens

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
John B. Owens
Image of John B. Owens
United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Tenure

2014 - Present

Years in position

10

Education

Bachelor's

University of California, Berkeley, 1993

Law

Stanford Law School, 1996

Personal
Birthplace
District of Columbia


John Byron Owens is a federal judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. Prior to joining the court, Owens was a litigation partner in the Los Angeles-based office of Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP.

Early life and education

Born in Washington, D.C., Owens earned his B.A., with high distinction, from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1993, and his J.D. from Stanford Law School in 1996, graduating first of his class.[1]

Professional career

  • 2010-2011: Chief, criminal division
  • 2008-2010: Deputy chief, major frauds section

Judicial career

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Nomination Tracker
Fedbadgesmall.png
Nominee Information
Name: John B. Owens
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
Progress
Confirmed 242 days after nomination.
ApprovedANominated: August 1, 2013
ApprovedAABA Rating: Unanimously Well Qualified
Questionnaire: Questionnaire
ApprovedAHearing: October 30, 2013
QFRs: QFRs (Hover over QFRs to read more)
ApprovedAReported: January 14, 2014 
ApprovedAConfirmed: March 31, 2014
ApprovedAVote: 56-43
DefeatedAReturned: January 3, 2014

On August 1, 2013, President Obama nominated John B. Owens to the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit to fill the vacancy left by Stephen S. Trott.[2] Obama commented on the nomination, stating, "Michelle T. Friedland, Justice Nancy L. Moritz and John B. Owens will bring an unwavering commitment to fairness and judicial integrity to the federal bench. Their impressive legal careers are testaments to the kind of thoughtful and diligent judges they will be on the Ninth and Tenth Circuits. I am honored to nominate them today."[1]

Owens was rated Unanimously Well Qualified for the nomination by the American Bar Association.[3] Hearings on Owens' nomination were held before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary on October 30, 2013. Pursuant to Rule XXXI, paragraph six, of the standing rules of the U.S. Senate, Owens' nomination was returned to the president on January 3, 2014.[4][5]

Owens was renominated on January 6, 2014, by President Obama. Owens' nomination was reported by U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) on January 16, 2014. Owens was confirmed on a recorded 56-43 vote of the U.S. Senate on March 31, 2014, and he received his commission on April 2, 2014.[6][7]

Noteworthy cases

Divided Ninth Circuit panel expands whistleblower protections

See also: United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (Paul Somers v. Digital Realty Trust; Ellen Jacobs, No. 15-17352)

On March 8, 2017, a divided three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. In 2010, Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which expanded existing protections for whistleblowers under Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under Section 21F, whistleblowers were defined as employees who reported possible securities violations to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). A subsequent SEC regulation expanded protection to those who reported potential violations to senior management internally as well. Such internal disclosures were mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, in many instances, were required prior to an employee externally reporting to the SEC or another federal agency. Paul Somers was fired by Digital Realty Trust after internally reporting potential securities violations to senior management, but not to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Somers filed a lawsuit in a federal district court. Digital Realty, relying on Section 21F's statutory definition, moved to dismiss the case, arguing that Somers did not report externally to the SEC and, therefore, he was not afforded whistleblower protections. Such a view is consistent with a 2013 ruling of the Fifth Circuit. On appeal, a divided three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit upheld the district court's denial of dismissal. Citing a 2015 precedent of the Second Circuit, the panel majority held that the SEC regulation was to be afforded Chevron deference and held that Section 21F's whistleblower protections must be extended to those who report possible securities violations internally to senior management as well as externally to the SEC.

Writing for himself in dissent, Judge John B. Owens stated,[8]

I agree with the Fifth Circuit in Asadi v. G.E. Energy (USA), L.L.C., ... and Judge Jacobs’ dissent in Berman v. Neo@Ogilvy LLC, ... and therefore respectfully dissent. Both the majority here and the Second Circuit in Berman rely in part on King v. Burwell, ... to read the relevant statutes in favor of the government’s position. In my view, we should quarantine King and its potentially dangerous shapeshifting nature to the specific facts of that case to avoid jurisprudential disruption on a cellular level.[9]

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments on this case during its October 2017 term.

For more, see Digital Realty Trust v. Somers

See also

External links

Footnotes

Political offices
Preceded by
-
United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit
2014-Present
Succeeded by
-