Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives March 14 2022
-
- Nomination Actress Verena Altenberger --Tsui 03:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nina Hartmann on stage --Tsui 03:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Nice view. Good quality. --Tsui 03:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Another nice view! Good quality. --Tsui 03:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marina Bays Sands Hotel, from the bridge connecting to the Gardens by the Bay, near Bayfront MRT station, in Singapore. --Basile Morin 03:35, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Karst peaks and green paddy fields under a stormy sky, view from the top of Mount Nam Xay, during the monsoon, in Vang Vieng, Vientiane Province, Laos. --Basile Morin 03:35, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dominik Frieser, player of LASK Linz. --Steindy 00:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 00:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The church of Panagitsa in Aegina. --C messier 22:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:28, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ilektra at Santos, São Paulo, Brazil --Mike Peel 19:57, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Nice crop and good quality. --Virtual-Pano 00:23, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wall with sundial, Červený Kláštor Monastery --Jakubhal 19:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:30, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Young olive tree (Olea europaea) growing in a stormy area, Lun, Croatia. --Palauenc05 19:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Passenger ship "Symphony" in Zadar harbour, Croatia. --Palauenc05 18:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, but light to the church not really iompressive --Michielverbeek 19:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC) --Michielverbeek 19:36, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Asian water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) --Charlesjsharp 17:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 17:43, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Asian water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) --Charlesjsharp 17:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Fischer.H 18:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Indian brown mongoose (Herpestes fuscus) --Charlesjsharp 17:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Indian brown mongoose (Herpestes fuscus) --Charlesjsharp 17:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Himmelkron Town Hall --Ermell 10:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruin of Neidenstein Castle near Hollfeld in Franconian Switzerland --Ermell 10:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Michael's Catholic Parish Church in Heroldsbach, aerial view. --Ermell 10:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lissabon - Ramparts of Castelo de São Jorge --Imehling 07:16, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion Good except that dust spots need to be eliminated. There are at least two, and they're big enough to see at full-page size without enlargement. -- Ikan Kekek 08:21, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Done Thanks. These dustspots are really pesky. --Imehling 09:12, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 19:55, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Exposure ('The squatting man') Artwork by Antony Gormley. Location: Markerstrekdam, Lelystad.
--Famberhorst 06:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality; there is a dust spot just right of the head, easy to remove --Llez 06:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
*Done. Removed spots. Thank you for your reviews.--Famberhorst 16:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Nomination Exposure ('The squatting man') Artwork by Antony Gormley. Location: Markerstrekdam, Lelystad.
-
- Nomination Saint Peter in chains church in Rignac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portal of the Saint Gratus church in Memer, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:46, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stained-glass in the St Martin church in Golinhac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Support good quality --Matutinho 08:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Peter in chains church in Quins, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the Saint Blaise church in Salan, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windows of 77 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Canada--Maksimsokolov 04:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windows of 1200 Bay Street, Toronto, Toronto, Canada--Maksimsokolov 04:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windows of MaRS Discovery District, Toronto, Canada--Maksimsokolov 04:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fragment of St. Thomas Aquinas Church, Toronto, Canada--Maksimsokolov 04:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A window of St. Thomas Aquinas Church, Toronto, Canada--Maksimsokolov 04:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:49, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel Our Lady of Loreto on Schlossweg #3, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City parish church Saint Nicholas on Hauptplatz #1a, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Please remove the dust spot (near the church tower). --XRay 05:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Done @XRay: Thanks for your review. Dust spot was removed. —- Johann Jaritz 06:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rectory, parish church Saint Margaret, cemetery with lantern of the dead and ossuary in Lieding, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former bishop`s castle on Schlossweg #6, Straßburg, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Donghuamen Night Market --Ermell 09:20, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:37, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Heroldsmühle in the district of Bamberg --Ermell 08:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Review
The crop is kind of tight horizontally. --aismallard 09:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Consensual review
editFile:Painted_fire_hydrant_of_Barlow_Avenue_and_Vaughan_Street_in_Quesnel,_BC_(DSCF5031).jpg
edit- Nomination Painted fire hydrant of Barlow Avenue and Vaughan Street in Quesnel, BC --Trougnouf 11:02, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:31, 11 March 2022 (UTC) Oppose Exposure problems, especially the left side appears blown. --Peulle 13:35, 11 March 2022 (UTC) Comment Nothing is overexposed, there are visible sunray flares on the left all the way to the tower. I think it's pretty normal and (imo) irrelevant to QI since the subject is fine and it brings other benefits (sun star reflections, great lighting on the plants) and (imo) cropping the left part hurts the composition more than the potential benefits from losing the flares. (But I would be happy to nominate File:Painted fire hydrant of Barlow Avenue and Vaughan Street in Quesnel, BC (DSCF5031) (cropped).jpg instead if there is a consensus that this version is no QI) --Trougnouf 14:03, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Oppose The left half of the figure's face is blown out. The buildings on the left cade quality. The image does not respect the rule of thirds. Per others--Lmbuga 14:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC) - Oppose I'd suggest cropping out the overexposed/flared left side, but there is no "rule" of thirds. -- Ikan Kekek 11:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposed. --Smial 01:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the feedback. I am nominating the cropped version then. --Trougnouf 14:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Steindy 14:29, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Lince_ibérico_(Lynx_pardinus),_Almuradiel,_Ciudad_Real,_España,_2021-12-19,_DD_06.jpg
edit- Nomination Iberian Lynx (Lynx pardinus), Almuradiel, Ciudad Real, Spain. --Poco a poco 19:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Pretty cat, but not sharp enough for QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 20:10, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, a pretty cat for which I drove 1000 Km, spent 2 days and waited for almost 10 hours to show up. The next one nominating another one with an iPhone from the Madrid zoo will be rewarded --Poco a poco 21:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Take it to CR if you like. -- Ikan Kekek 08:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- No, will not argue about the status of the image, I just wanted to make people aware of the effort we sometimes put behind an image. Images like this are not comparable with those taken in a zoo and QI has unfortunately no rule to give those more value --Poco a poco 16:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I surely appreciate your effort! I'm judging only the result. I do judge photos of wild animals taken in the field differently from photos shot in zoos. -- Ikan Kekek 19:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support While it may not be crispy, IMHO this image is QI and I would like to see the consensus in CR. --GRDN711 05:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Based on what is generally expected, I don't think this one is sharp enough for a 2021 QI.--Peulle 07:40, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Perfect composition, lighting, and exposure, but unfortunately unsharp even at A4 Size, and very noisy in full size. A real pity. --Smial 12:33, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Weak support Perfect composition, lighting, and exposure. The noise seems to give it an artistic dimension. It's very pretty, and it looks artistic--Lmbuga 13:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose sharpness isn't there. Tomer T 13:37, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness is not perfect, but the image is highly valuable. --Nefronus 07:12, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support per others. IMHO is QI --Rjcastillo 23:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Definitely not QI per others. Could be a VI candidate. --Tagooty 03:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)