Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SM Mall of Asia

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:SM Mall of Asia 1

[edit]

Per COM:FOP#Philippines.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Wrong interpretation of copyright law, IMO. "The law is silent on the matter", therefore it can equally be presumed to be permissible. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:40, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's not correct. The law protects all uses of a work, unless an exception is explicitly given in the law. No such exception is given in the law. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:00, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. There is no Philippine precedent declaring such photography as an infringement especially if it's done in fair use (Sec.184 Limitations). This mall is a major landmark in Manila and is heavily photographed and published in many websites and media including that of the Philippine Department of Tourism (www.tourism.gov.ph). --RioHondo (talk) 10:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide evidence that freedom of panorama exists in the Philippines. COM:FOP#Philippines says that there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, and the standard practice is to delete images of recent buildings from the Philippines. See Category:Philippine FOP cases/deleted for examples of other pictures of buildings in the Philippines which have been deleted. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I think the conclusion at COM:FOP#Philippines is wrong. The law needs to explicitly state that FOP does not exist. Moreover, section 184.1 (c) and (d) of the Copyright Law do permit use for information and reporting purposes. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's not correct. A copyright law explicitly needs to state that an exception exists. Otherwise, the exception doesn't exist. Also, an exception which only allows you to use images for "information and reporting purposes" fails COM:FU. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: there is no FOP in the Philippines. FASTILY 20:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:SM Mall of Asia 2

[edit]

No freedom of pano in the Philippines. Refer to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama phil copy law doesnt allow non-fair use of photos of copyrighted architecture and sculpture in the phils. An architecture or sculpture is said to enter allowable commercial use of their photos if it has been 50 years after the death of the last surviving person architect engineer or designer or if 50 years after the completion if it is a work of joint companies in architecture

Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Slashed my input, as the discussions reached the conclusion that there is still no FOP. A bill to amend the copyright law (now containing FOP provision) is now at the legislature, but when will this be passed is yst to be seen. Also, FOP will only come into fruition when the accompanying Implementing Rules and Regulations has been made. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
4 years prescription since 2015 under the New 2019 SC Circular vis-à-vis Copyright law to question any FOP matter: a Legal Bar due to Extinctive Prescription to delete my photos User:Ramon FVelasquez as tagged by the Smart One September 2020 Mass Deletions
  • I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ...
  •  Keep Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully respectfully

Judgefloro (talk) 08:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed the images (via "d" indicators when running my Visual File Change).  Delete and  Keep per my inputs above. After 2-month discussion, the consensus is still no FOP in the Philippines. Files deleted may be undeleted once FOP is introduced in our country. The so-called prescription period doesn't apply according to Clindberg's reply to my query on his talk page. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:44, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep at least for the construction images of The Galeon domes as per Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Burj Khalifa. These photos are the dome structure in its intermediate construction stage.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept some and added De minimis template. Cropped some to remove part of image. Deleted some because other building present were imho nót de minimis. Kept one because it appears no creative architecture at all. Thanks User:JWilz12345 for all your effort, very helpful. --Ellywa (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:SM_Mall_of_Asia&oldid=606696969"