Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Gero Clemens Hocker.jpg

Image:Gero Clemens Hocker.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2013 at 18:18:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/Image:Gero Clemens Hocker.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Gero Clemens Hocker.jpg

•  Info created by Jean11 - uploaded by Jean11 - nominated by Jean11 -- Jean11 (talk) 18:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jean11 (talk) 18:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment strong blue chromatic aberration --Vamps (talk) 12:00, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I wouldn't describe the CA as "strong". This is a full-size image so you're going to spot things at 100%. The lighting and focus are very good and the pose better than the current article lead picture imo. Colin (talk) 16:42, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I think it's not CA, it's false color, false color in her hair, no false color (Example of false color on JP Pentax website.) and this is good quality photo imo :) --Laitche (talk) 02:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose visible CA, a tad underexposed, unbalanced composition. Sharpness is great. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 11:39, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Neutral CAs are marginal, I also do not see a compositional problem. But I am missing something special. It's a technically well done and very sharp studio shot, but imho the studio light does not create moodful light here justifying this photo becoming an FP. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:46, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Info maginal CA removed
•  Comment Ok, he isn´t a woman, the special is his view, see his eyes.
•  Comment I didn't realize that blue CA... --Laitche (talk) 15:43, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
•  Support —Mono 17:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)