Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2024

File:At Tenerife 2023 644 - Sub Fun Cinco entering Marina San Miguel.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 17:58:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Submarines
Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see anything extraordinary here. Light and compo aren't special. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:23, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing exttraordinary and yacht in the background riuns the composition. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heracles statue at the Schwerin Castle (1).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 19:47:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the stormy sky matching the mood of the statue. Yann (talk) 08:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 10:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 10:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:17, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors

File:Mont de Chemun sun Mot de Sëuc y Sasplat.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2024 at 14:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Neutral Impressive range of detail, great composition in good light. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temporarily changed my vote to Neutral until the issue mentioned below is fixed. It would be a pity if the nomination fails because of this small detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have to agree with Basile, that the addition of the sky has resulted in a strange cross pattern in the new section, as well as blurring the top of the peak. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It needs to breath at the top, could you add more crop? Poco a poco (talk) 16:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- you’re right but I’d have to construct it, thanks ----Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  It´s only sky, where is the problem. Ermell (talk) 22:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice Hasselblad X2D-100C! However, Poco is right that the composition could use more room above, hence the weak support. dllu (t,c) 00:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Oppose Poco pointed out exactly what I was going to write. The picture needs more space at the top to breathe -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop is too tight. -- Karelj (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Nice picture, but bad crop. Yann (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Crossed out my vote. Yann (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Karelj. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 07:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Support now, very cool. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 09:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Poco a poco, Radomianin, Ermell, Basile Morin, Karelj, Yann, and Красный: Thanks for your comment. I uploaded a new version with extension of the sky (thanks to "AI") --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification, but the top of the mountain now shows weird artifacts and the generated clouds are of much lower quality than those really photographed. There are also colorful outlines around. Thus my negative vote remains. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the note but I have to agree with Basile. PP should done better.--Ermell (talk) 21:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'll just take note that adding a strip of computer-generated sky and clouds here, sparked no debate, only a comment that the fix was was badly executed. --Cart (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: would support if the sky is fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:54, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Continental I-1430 NASM.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 18:57:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Others
Info created by Dane A. Penland, uploaded by Nimbus227, nominated by Yann
Info Continental Hyper I-1430-11, Inverted V-12 Engine. One-half right front view.
Support For a change from nice birds and cute animals. ;o) -- Yann (talk) 18:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. Thanks for bringing something fresh! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Attractive photo in cavalier perspective; and per Yann and Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice machines and cute engines? :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chepry (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 15:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Others

File:Bloemknop van een Camellia × williamsii 'Roger Hall'. 26-03-2024 (actm.) 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 04:22:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Theaceae
Info Flower bud of a Camellia x williamsii 'Roger Hall'. Focus stack of 13 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Meiræ 12:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The petals have alternate blurry and sharp sections. Looks like the number of images used is not sufficient. --Tagooty (talk) 04:12, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative meer kaders

Support El Golli Mohamed 19:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The new image is not much improvement, it has blurs where the previous was sharp. Eg the top edges of the petals. The focus stacking needs rework. The tool I use, Zerene Stacker, allows one to copy a part of a specific image into the output. I find this useful for sharpening blurry areas that the automatic stacking cannot fix. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 09:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thueringen NSG271 Bischofsau1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 22:00:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Thuringia
Info created by KaiBorgeest - uploaded by KaiBorgeest - nominated by KaiBorgeest -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technical issue and low wow factor. The clouds are burnt (blown highlights) and the scenery is not exceptional in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:27, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile --Milseburg (talk) 14:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin: How do you define the 'Wow factor'?--KaiBorgeest (talk) 21:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See "Wow factor" in the dictionary : "a quality or feature of something that makes people feel great excitement or admiration" or "a quality that makes someone feel excited or surprised when they first see something". See also COM:I: "Featured pictures candidates should meet all the following requirements, must have a "wow factor" and may or may not have been created by a Commons user. Given sufficient "wow factor" and mitigating circumstances, a featured picture is permitted to fall short on technical quality." -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment In my opinion it's unappealing how the horizon intersects the plants, it makes for a messy composition Henrysz (talk) 23:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 09:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allium purple sensation, 17-04-2024 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 04:07:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae
Info Budding flower bud of an Allium purple sensation. Focus stack of 38 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:07, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chepry (talk) 17:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain Outstanding composition and well-made stacking, so don't want to vote against it, but lower part of the flower is rather noisy, so no support from me either. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean {{Neutral}}? ★ 17:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ArionStar: Thanks for the hint. However, please do not set the Neutral example as an active template, otherwise it will be counted by the bot. Please use either a NoWiki code (e.g. {{Neutral}}) or the plain symbol (e.g. File:Symbol neutral vote.svg) without template. I took the liberty to do so. Thank you and best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 22:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Radomianin, thanks for the notification. I have changed the "File" with a {{tl}} otherwise the FPCBot considers there's an alternative, and asks which image should be promoted -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good point concerning possible misreadings as an alternative. Thanks a lot, Basile! -- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 08:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 23:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 09:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae

File:Трпејца со Охридското Езеро.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 22:06:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:F-15E takes on fuel from KC-10.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2024 at 02:22:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
Info created by Staff Sgt. Sean Carnes - first uploaded by ToprakM - edits by FOX 52 - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 02:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is an outstanding photo if you can ignore the overly compressed background-- Schierbecker (talk) 02:22, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is the title incorrect? where is the fuel coming from? Buidhe (talk) 03:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably one of a series of photos from the fueling mission, and explanation to why the planes were so close to each other and lazy file naming. It could be renamed "Airman in F-15E takes photo of KC-10" ;-), given what is going on in the photo, or "F-15E during fueling stage from KC-10". --Cart (talk) 10:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support ★ 03:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:31, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just expressing a wish for more photos like this that aren't so tightly cropped. It's a very fast plane, but right up against the frame it doesn't look it. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tight crop and lacking "wow". It is well below the bar of FPs in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 09:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alouette bilophe.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 17:12:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)
Info Temminck's lark (Eremophila bilopha) in Douz desert, Tunisiacreated by Houssembo - uploaded by Houssembo - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've just uploaded this image which I prefer even though I would not nominate it for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The bird is looking away -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Too late, but FWIW I like this photo a lot -- the lighting and setting/background have drama that may compensate for technical shortcomings (and for a superior motif, I don't think facing away is a problem). That said, I think it's probably not going to pass FPC, but you should be proud of the photo anyway. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plaza de España (Sevilla) - 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 19:18:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
Info created and uploaded by Kadellar - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 19:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice light but the tower on the right has visible purple fringing. Would happily support if cleaned up. BigDom (talk) 00:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I could correct this but I know the author even in person, I don't know if it's respectful to do so, let's hope he sees this nomination Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can create an alternative. ★ 00:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 14:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Romanesco broccoli texture.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 18:20:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Vegetables_(raw)
Info nomination per ArionStar's request; c/u/n by Ivar (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing textures and shapes! ★ 21:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality is excellent with a very high level of detail and a good light. The subject itself, with its natural fractal structure, is another wonder -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:00, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Never knew this was in my mouth -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exellent. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support As fractal lover :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 18:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Benoît Mandelbrot would love this image. --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. A fascinating vegetable. – Aristeas (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Titan2456 (talk) 14ː12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Vegetables (raw)

File:Courvite Isabelle Jbil NP.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 13:33:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Glareolidae
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would always recommend checking Wikipedia to see if a nomination is better than the image in the infobox. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We are not in the section Valued image candidates here and the image in the infobox has not a better quality than this one (look at the edges of the bird in the infobox image, in addition the image tilts to the left). El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your comment is innocent or is it just to put spokes in the wheels? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 11:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexander McQueen clamshell dress (51611p).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 00:32:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
Info A razor clamshell dress by Alexander McQueen for his spring/summer 2001 collection "Voss", featured here as part of a Metropolitan Museum of Art exhibition "Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion". all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support another kind to present shells --Llez (talk) 08:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:58, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poor skin inside :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:51, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wish he didn't kill himself -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Clothing and textiles

File:Killdeer (20453).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 00:36:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Charadrius
Info Adult killdeer (Charadrius vociferus). All by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Got lucky with it walking right towards me for a moment. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well captured -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 07:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 23:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Charadrius

File:Kriegergedenkplatte an der Aussegnungshalle auf dem Friedhof Siegendorf (Oberschwarzach).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 18:04:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Germany
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 18:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The lower left corner, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technically OK apart from the compositional flaw that Basile pointed out, but even if that were fixed, there is no wow factor to this image. Would be better as QI. dllu (t,c) 04:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Plozessor (talk) 11:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jajan Pasar in Jakarta edit.JPG

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 06:52:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
Info created and by Crisco 1492 - nominated by Desertasad -- Desertasad (talk) 06:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Desertasad (talk) 06:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. --Basile Morin (talk) 07:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chlebowski-Bajazyt w niewoli.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2024 at 09:18:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others
Info created by wp:en:Stanisław Chlebowski - uploaded by Ejdzej - nominated by Elvorix -- Bayezid I held captive by Timur, painting by Stanisław Chlebowski (1878) ×Elvorix^talk 09:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ×Elvorix^talk 09:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Unfortunately, at 1.6 megapixels, this image is below the required minimum resolution of 2 megapixels. Perhaps you can find a higher resolution with a freely available license, in which case we would appreciate a renewed nomination. Sorry for that. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 12:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:008 Black-headed heron from up close in the Tarangire National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 12:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 23:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High resolution and level of detail, striking look -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Ardea

File:View from the Schlossbergalm 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 09:10:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:10, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 23:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Elaborately created panorama in which there is much to discover. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

File:Dunnock (Prunella modularis) 3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 07:33:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Prunellidae (Accentors)
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 07:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 07:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Prunellidae (Accentors)

File:2024 Solar Eclipse over Cleveland Terminal Tower - 53650722351.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2024 at 14:50:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Sequences (Chronological)
Info created by EDrost88 - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! ★ 15:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I’m super excited for the new year. Wolverine XI 16:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great matching between the tower and the eclipse. Yann (talk) 20:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- The timing is perfect! Riad Salih (talk) 17:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:35, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect planning -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support interesting approach to a much-photographed phenomenon — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too strange and artificial for me. --Milseburg (talk) 14:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Milseburg What's so "strange" and "artificial" about this? Are the eclipse patterns symmetrical? Are the buildings too bright for you? Your comment is too vague for me to see the problems. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In reality, the city's lighting situation certainly not have been as static as the picture makes it seem. Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Milseburg The image is a composite, which means that it went through some tweaking to achieve the desired effect. By my looks, the image must have been captured during totality, then the eclipse phases were added to some parts of the sky based on the location during that phase. I'm not a photography expert, so if anyone can explain it better and more accurately than me, please do. WildMouse76 (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think so too. Too strange and artificial for me. Milseburg (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't even want to think how hard it was to place everything for that photo. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chepry (talk) 17:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 09:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Rhododendrites. – Aristeas (talk) 14:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /WildMouse76 (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Sequences (Chronological)

File:Raden Saleh - Diponegoro arrest.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 07:00:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1800-1849
Info created by Raden Saleh - uploaded by Woudloper - nominated by Desertasad -- Desertasad (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Desertasad (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. --Basile Morin (talk) 07:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hint to @Desertasad: along with File:Nicolaas Pieneman - The Submission of Prince Dipo Negoro to General De Kock.jpg, they look great! I can help you to nominate the files correctly. ★ 00:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tapsi Miniature Poodle Galloping Contraction Extension Harangi Apr24 A7C 10646-7 Pano.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 04:02:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Composites (Multiple images merged into one)
Info A composite image of a miniature poodle galloping, showing full contraction followed by full extension. The two images were shot 0.189 sec apart. The poodle is 14 inches (36 cm) high at the shoulder and head+body length is 23 inches (58 cm). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:02, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
??? ★ 00:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tagooty: renominate this, don't let this work die! (I just found out your daughter is an Oscar winner :O) ★ 00:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aerial image of Finsteraarhorn (view from the south).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 09:36:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Valais
Info The Finsteraarhorn is the highest mountain of the Bernese Alps, the ninth-highest mountain of the Alps, the most prominent peak of Switzerland and the third-most prominent peak in the Alps; the image shows the 1200 m high southwest face which lies in the canton of Valais; created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 09:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 09:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely impressive to me! -- Radomianin (talk) 22:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Valais

File:2014-Cambodge Angkor Wat (21).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 08:50:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues indoors
InfoStatue of reclining Buddha in the central Prasat. Angkor Wat Siem Reap, Cambodia
all by me -- Pierre André ^(talk) 08:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pierre André ^(talk) 08:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am not sure it is OK for FP. A tripod with less ISO may be required. Yann (talk) 10:06, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice, the shooting conditions were particularly difficult, this statue of sleeping Buddha is located on the uppermost terrace. I couldn't figure out how to fix this problem. If the image is not OK for FP, I will quickly remove it from the proposals made Best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:51, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I love the atmosphere Henrysz (talk) 23:10, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 00:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition is fine but the head is out of focus. Shallow depth of field. And at ISO 2500, the quality is on the low level. A tripod would have helped -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gorila de montaña (Gorilla beringei beringei), parque nacional de la Selva Impenetrable de Bwindi, Uganda, 2024-02-02, DD 80.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 14:14:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Hominidae (Great Apes)
Info Female mountain gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei), Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Focus on the eyes, high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:31, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 07:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 10:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't know if it's just me, but the eyes of great apes are simply captivating. Wolverine XI 12:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The eyes! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support (but there seems to be red and blue CA on the skin that could be fixed) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Hominidae (Great Apes)

File:Grèbe huppé Thyna008.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2024 at 21:55:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Podicipedidae (Grebes)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 03:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 06:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chepry (talk) 17:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Most interesting part, the head is out of focus. The focus is on the feathers of the back, behind. And with this low resolution, only 2,159 × 2,879 pixels, it is a real quality issue -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The crest of the grebe is the most interesting part and it is in focus. You can't shoot at F11 in wildlife photography to have the tip of the beak in focus for such a situation. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The beak is just about okay, but not the crest above, nor the eyes, nor even the crest around the neck. The focus is really further away, probably because the bird was moving forward. Or because the focus point was not adequately targeted -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A striking snapshot, but unfortunately the technical quality is inadequate. I wonder why the image received QI status when head and eyes are not in focus. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you are giving many support votes, Radomianin, why do you not give an oppose vote for an inadequate nomination that you would reject at QI? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking, Charles. As for dissenting votes, I prefer to use them very thoughtfully. If possible, I try to convey my opinion with a comment or, if in doubt, a neutral vote. However, if it's necessary to prevent a promotion in the interest of common consensus, I do so - as in this example. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. But your policy, whilst it avoids creating enemies, skews nominations in favour of promotion. I have had to give up opposing nominations except in exceptional circumstances (e.g. ethics), so I have also stopped supporting excellent nominations which is a shame. The general enmity and frequent hostility from other users made my life too stressful, so I can see where you are coming from. Unfortunately, it is not possible to hide the identity of voters. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your thoughts, Charles. I think a detailed, reasoned dissenting vote is very valuable to be constructive for the image and the photographer. However, a constructive comment can be equally helpful in not scaring off new talent. An offer of help can also rescue a nomination. Because FPC thrives on diversity, which is not always the case. I have also learned a lot on this forum over the years, and yet I can't get enough of participating regularly and enjoying the contributions of fellow users. Speaking only for myself, it may not always be easy, but as in real life, learning from mistakes strengthens your skills and ultimately your level of confidence. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charles is trying to do everything to prevent my photos from being promoted. We had an old argument together and he is doing this purely out of revenge. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 11:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your comment, El Golli Mohamed. I didn't know about that, and I'm sorry that there were differences. If I may express my humble opinion in general, perhaps past misunderstandings should be settled in respectful agreement in order to look forward to the future unencumbered. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 11:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Thank you. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 11:53, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

El Golli Mohamed is misleading you, Radomianin. He was recently suspended from Commons for two weeks for an unprovoked insult. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And you want me suspended for life? so your comment is not about the photo but it's just a personal matter. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp and El Golli Mohamed: Thank you for letting me know, Charles. I was not aware of the incident, but I found the relevant entry. Please allow me to share my opinion as an outsider: It is not okay to insult, El Golli Mohamed. It is also not okay to feel provoked or to provoke. We should always remember the principle of assuming good intentions. If someone feels provoked, it might be a good idea to wait a bit before responding calmly. I think it would be appropriate for you to settle your differences, perhaps with an apology. What is the point of remembering past incidents? I'm sure you're both friendly and outgoing people in real life, so you should look to the future and not lose focus on the main goal of our presence here: Working together to build a valuable media library for reusers. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You can take a look at my Cream-coloured Courser's nomination. You will understand. A kind of unbearable repetitive sticks in the wheels. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:28, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I assume it's about this nomination. You withdrew the nomination two days after it was created. I think this was a bit hasty. Please don't be discouraged by comments and be patient. With some nominations, reviewers are undecided at first and decide to review the image later. Your assumption, mentioned on the nomination page, that there is a lobby that does not want to judge the photo is not correct, in my opinion. You may want to consider reversing your withdrawal to allow the nomination to run its course. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, I already nominated another photo. I didn't say I was surrounded by a lobby, I said there was a lobby (so a minority, two or three) that discourages most of the participants here. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. Yes, you're right - you wrote "It seems like there is a lobby around here". I apologize for the misquote, I have corrected it. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:46, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose It's a great shot that you got at the right moment. But unfortunately, the head and eyes are out of focus, probably because the bird swam toward you. Even post-processing would not be able to fix this problem. Normally, the wow factor takes precedence over technical quality, but in my humble opinion, the lack of focus on the most important part of the body is a criterion against promotion. I'm sorry about that. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The ferruginous crest of the grebe is the most interesting part of the bird and it is in focus. You can't shoot at F11 in wildlife photography to have all the depth of field from the tip of the beak till the crest in focus for such a situation. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that it is very challenging to create such ambitious images. However, as I see it, the focus in your photo is mainly on the flight feathers, as even the impressive crest is not completely in focus. I suspect that the bird's movement towards you was faster than the autofocus. I think if the crest had been sharper, the eyes and head would also have been more in focus than they are now. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it's not easy to camouflage yourself and wait for the bird to come towards you with this raised crest look without it seeing you. Afterwards you have to react quickly and the autofocus in this kind of light does not allow you to point the eye quickly enough. Either you wait for the autofocus to catch the eye and you can miss a very nice shot or you give priority to the trigger even if it does not catch the eye perfectly. I have many classic photos of Great Crested Grebe with a clear eye but with this atmosphere this is the only photo. Anyone who has ever practice wildlife photography knows what I'm talking about. An art critic will focus on the sharp eye. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:23, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point of view. Thank you for your detailed explanations. The work of wildlife photographers is something that I have a great deal of respect for. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think the focus bit is negligible in this case. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The image is slightly tilted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Podicipedidae (Grebes)

File:Guermassa, vue sur le village.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 00:55:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Tunisia
InfoGeneral view of Guermassa, Berber village in southern Tunisia created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by نعيم قربوسي -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The clone stamp error should be fixed.--Ermell (talk) 21:29, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i fix the problem , thank you Skander zarrad (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful view of a stunning site. – Aristeas (talk) 14:56, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Description in Arabic to add... --Mile (talk) 19:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:34, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Tunisia

File:Wildlife Photographer Giles Laurent in a ghillie suit.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2024 at 14:47:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info Wildlife Photographer Giles Laurent in a ghillie suit. Created and uploaded by him - nominated by me -- ★ 14:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 14:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nomination! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Giles, you're a FP-related subject yourself! ★ 15:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I know how aware it is to use these suits, manufacture one by hand with natural waste, use a perfume of wild plants but for some reason it is a magnet for mosquitoes. Internally its very heat, a plastic layer for isolate should be used the human smell of the outside --Wilfredor (talk) 16:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome back, Wil! ★ 16:17, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't gone back, at least not to create my own FPCs Wilfredor (talk) 22:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest I never encountered this mosquito problem in Switzerland with the suit but it’s true it’s hot in the ghillie suit. Because of that I acquired another set of camouflage clothing for warm temperatures -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What I used to do was place food in a place and wait for the animals to come, but during that wait I ended up suffocating at temperatures above 40 degrees, in addition to mosquitoes constantly entering my ears. At the time there was no way to be very far from the birds because the vegetation was very dense where they were, so this also forced me to stay in the same position for a long time. Wilfredor (talk) 17:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Personally I've never fed wild animals and it is also forbidden to do that in Switzerland (but there exist legal exceptions: putting a bird feeder in winter in the garden is tolerated in Switzerland) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Tripod used? Just to be sure the credit is correct for the author of the photo -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Indeed, unless it's a staged shot by usage of tripod and self-timer, the author's attribution cannot be correct as is. On the other hand, if the photo is staged and so the action depicted is not genuine, may it still be featured for our "People at work" gallery? --A.Savin 09:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That gallery also include people going to or from work, preparing for work, or taking a break during work. Besides, if Giles really was in his working position in the photo, would we be able to spot him in it? ;-) --Cart (talk) 09:26, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a bit more about the context of this photo : I installed the tripod and my old camera kept taking pictures every few seconds. Different pictures in different poses were taken. A bit before I was done, a group of small birds luckily perched themselves on branches on my right and didn’t seem to notice me thanks to the camouflage. I photographed them for a bit but then these energetic birds went further away. This moment gave the best picture (this one) as it was natural. After that I also tried a slightly different location just a few steps away to see if the background was better but in my opinion this shot was still the best. So it is true it was "staged" at beginning when the tripod was put on the ground and the goal was simply to document what a wildlife photographer in a ghillie suit looks like but it could be said that it technically wasn’t staged or at least less staged with this picture as I was really looking at the birds. Anyway I don’t know which gallery is most adequate, if you think "Standing people" is better you can move it there. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After having a look at the "People at work" gallery I think many of them could be considered as "staged" as well because they are clearly posing for the camera so I don't think it's a problem for that gallery but again if you prefer you can move to "Standing people" or to "Others" -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very true Cart. But actually this is a "work position" as well and it happens quite often because one difficult thing is finding a good spot so you first have to explore different areas looking for signs of the targeted animal presence (hair, footprints, droppings, etc.) and in that process you can find many other different animals so when you see/hear one (you often hear before seeing) you stop moving and look more carefully around. I photographed many mammals in that standing position and as long as they didn't see you move or that the wind isn't sending your smell in their direction you can stay undetected. And even when they see you, if you keep not moving they sometimes even walk in your direction (sometimes very close) intrigued by this weird tree or bush with a black hole and these are just moments when your adrenaline is very high and that you never forget -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know. I was mostly joking about that "pile of grass" same as Rhododendrites did. My ex was a hunter, although up here we rely more on blinds and hides than camo. Great shot anyway! --Cart (talk) 12:53, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I used a tripod with my old camera and the author is correct. My main goal of that day was to search for a group of wolves that was seen multiple times in the previous weeks in the area and that attacked a group of cows. Unfortunately I didn’t see wolves that day but that’s just nature! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:28, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 06:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 07:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Apart from the grass in the front, everything else is high quality. Wolverine XI 11:48, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MartinD (talk) 18:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC) As the Dutch put it: your own mother wouldn't recognize you.;)[reply]
Support ~~Oppose - There's nothing but a pile of grass in the photo!~~ - Question: first FP depicting an FPC participant? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good one ;) Actually I was the human looking at the stars during perseids so the ghillie isn't the first picture ;) But I doubt that with 18'198 featured pictures in total it would be the first FPC participant featured -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only silhouettes and bits of skins :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:17, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Classy outfit in green surroundings and a touch of mystery in appearance. You are now SVD and M25 ready. --Argenberg (talk) 21:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Has been on my “favourites” list for a long time. – Aristeas (talk) 14:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:09, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:006 Wild Baby Alpine Chamois Creux du Van and Swiss Alps Sunset colors Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 13:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/In_their_habitats#Artiodactyla (Even-toed Ungulates)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose That dark blurred area on the right spoils the composition IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 17:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. I guess you are talking of one of the two trees? They are the reason the chamois were there: close to them the snow is less deep and they can dig the snow with their hooves to eat the grass. The trees are thus part of the habitats of these chamois, which is one of the reasons why the gallery Animals in their habitat was chosen for this picture. Also, I actually personally think that they give a nice touch to the image with their soft colors illuminated by the sunset. Also both trees point to the subject and the chamois clearly stands out with its dark color in this snowy background with soft sunset illuminated colors. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support From the point of view of the chosen gallery, I think the composition is appropriate. In my opinion, the blurred elements in the foreground and background can be considered a compositional style. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin --Terragio67 (talk) 03:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (regretfully). I have to agree with Poco² that the blurred area on the right ruins it. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. I still personally think that the background tree is a nice echo of the foreground tree, giving the viewer a sense of what the foreground tree actually looks like while also beeing relevant to the chamois' environment. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a fair point, but the tree takes the salience. SHB2000 (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I still think that the chamois stands out way more than the background tree for multiple reasons : 1) the chamois is the clear subject in the middle of the frame ; 2) the chamois is wearing it's black winter coat which makes it stand out compared to the light-colored snow ; 3) the bokeh is cleary separating the subject from the background ; 4) the foreground tree creates perfect leading lines that point directly at the center of the frame where the subject is placed ; 5) the snow horizon on the background on the left side creates another leading line to the center of the frame where the subject is placed ; 6) the snow on the middleground of the image that goes from the bottom right of the picture to the center also creates another leading line pointing to the subject ; 7) finally, even the background tree is pointing right at the subject. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop IMO, the photo is mainly just "background". —kallerna (talk) 07:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. The gallery "animals in their habitats" was especially created to feature pictures where a step back was taken and where a wider view is presented. Per creator of this gallery : "It is so great to see the animals as part of photos of their habitat. So please, when you super-record the critters, do also take a step back and compose a few great photos where we can see a bit more of the places where they live". This image is exactly that, it allows to have a wider view that changes from the usual "mugshots" that we often see on animals here. The wider view on this shot was intended for various reasons. It emphasizes the small size of the subject and the fact that it is still a small baby on a big snow covered environment with only a few trees. The wider look also allows to see two trees that are relevant to the environment of the chamois in winter because close to them there is less snow on the ground and the chamois can more easily dig the snow with their hooves to eat the grass. Finally the wider shots also allows to showcase the swiss alps in the background beautifully illuminated by sunset light to complete the scene. If the image would have been cropped/framed to only include the chamois, it would have in my opinion a lot less educational value because we would be missing all these interesting elements about it's habitat. Moreover the wider shots allows to showcase the beautiful sunset colors which is a rare thing to capture with wildlife photography. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If so, the habitat should not be OOF. —kallerna (talk) 13:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The chamois is still the main subject of the image so it's normal to have the focus on him. The bokeh is destined to bring the viewer's attention to the main subject while still allowing to have an idea of the surroundings, without needing to see them in details (or they would steal attention from the main subject). We have several FP on the gallery "Animals in their habitat" that also have bokeh background : 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Moreover, except if background is extremely close to the subject (or if the subject is far away), you will always have bokeh at 600mm. The use of a 600mm zoom was intentional, as it creates a compression effect that allows the background elements to look closer than they really are. Here is an exemple with a photo (from the internet) of the Château de Chillon with a probably like 25-35mm lense. The red square illustrates where the Dents du Midi are. Here is now a photo of the Château de Chillon taken from more far away with a 155mm zoom in order to have the Dents du Midi mountain appearing in big behind the castle to make them look like they are closer than they really are. This same technique was used in this shot in order to have the Swiss Alps appearing in the background (else they would be extremely small in the background because they are 40-60km further away). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This new gallery was not an improvement for several of us. See Strange disconnected extra gallery.

kallerna takes great photographs of animals in their environment, like File:Vicugna vicugna Salar de Chalviri.jpg and File:Faroese sheep Sumba 1.jpg (both FP) and I think that if you choose to include the background, then this visible context should be attractive / aesthetic in some way. Otherwise the animal is just too small -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are comparing a domestic animal like a sheep that can extremely easily be approached + an animal that can also easily be approached by humans (vicuna) to a chamois, a wild animal that can't be approached like that. Both pictures you linked were taken at 21mm and 48mm at a close distance (=no bokeh), which is usually not something that can be done with this animal where you have to use a telephoto lense like the 600mm that I used (=inevitable bokeh). To photograph the animal I had to crawl on the snow and hide my body behind a natural bump on the ground with only my head, camera and hands appearing to the chamois, in order to not disturb him and not feel threatening to him or he probably would have fled. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are a bunch of photos of Rupicapra rupicapra on Commons and Wikipedia. So it doesn't seem so difficult to approach them.

Backgrounds in focus don't necessary "steal attention from the main subject", at least not in the two examples shown above.

The problem with long focal lengths is they focus on small things. Everything around gets blurry. So the compromise "subject + around" is difficult. Since it quickly gives an insignifiant small subject lost in a big uninteresting space. I think that's what Kallerna says when writing the photo is mainly just "background". Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:13, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you look the images from your link you will notice that they have been all taken from very far or with a telephoto lense, and/or went into a big crop, which proves my point that they are not as easily approachable as a domestic sheep or a vicuna. The group of chamois that I saw was a bit nervous and I have no doubt they would very likely have fled if I would be standing up and not lying on the ground with just my head visible. Moreover, for the sheep image you link I personally have my attention very much directed to the houses on the right because they are in clear focus and I personally don't like animal photography with human constructed elements but that's just my personal taste. Finally I don't think that the subject gets lost in a big uninteresting space for this photo because as said above it emphasizes the small size of the subject and the fact that it is still a small baby on a big snow covered environment with only a few trees. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proportionally, it's a huge background with small animal. And the background itself is... white, with almost nothing apart from distracting blurry elements -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:40, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's more rare to see such composition on FPC because here people usually only do mugshots of wild animals but there still are other images in the same situation as linked above : 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. I personally think that this composition brings value to the image because it allows to have a view of the environment and also because it tells a story that a narrow croped/frame picture would not be able to tell. Also I personally think that the background would be distracting if it was in focus and that the bokeh beautifully separates the subject from the background while still beeing possible to understand the context. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Environment are greats when they fit. Have a quick glance at this picture. What do you see? Two dark forms. One is okay, and one is a strange bush, like saying "hello, I'm here but just a big unclear shape. Try to find something else in this large, large frame" -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only dark form I see is the chamois and I think the background tree brings welcoming nice warm colors to a mostly cold snow background giving a nice mix of warm and cold to the image. The background tree also echoes the foreground tree giving the viewer a sense of its shape. It also is relevant to the chamois environment because the herd went where the trees were for more easily accessible grass. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In theory perhaps, but not out of focus like that, so that when you zoom in, it's just blur in your face! :-) Basile Morin (talk) 13:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you see at unzoomed size that it's a tree I don't see why you would want to zoom at it to see if it's still a tree. Bokeh areas is not meant to be zoomed at since it's not the main subject. You will have the same result when zooming in bokeh areas of these pictures : 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 and it is a normal thing. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... Is it not the third time now these 5 links appear on this page? Lol :-) Honestly the big brown mass was not so obvious as a tree at first sight. You were there, but not the observers. Problem is that these elements you don't see the necessity to see in large size actually dominate -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I repost them for convenience to have clearer view of what is beeing refered to. But I agree that the discussion has become cyclical and that everything was already said (many times). I think it's still quite visible that it's a tree with all the branches and some of them with snow. Yes the domination is actually precisely the point of this composition: to have a small baby chamois depicted in a vast open environment with difficultly accessible grass as everything on the ground is deeply snow covered, except close to the trees. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:16, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nice light but 1) the feet are hidden, 2) the big blurry brown mass is distracting, and 3) the snowy branch is out of focus. Cluttered composition in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. I don't think the feet beeing hidden is a problem for ungulates and we have multiple FP in that situation (in addition to the image of the domesetic sheep you sent yourself above) : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, etc. Moreover, as explained above, to photograph the animal I had to crawl up a a natural bump in the snow to only have my head, hands and camera appearing to the animal so that it would not feel threatened by me. If I had stood up to have the chamois feet in the image, not only would the chamois have probably fled, but also the composition would have been extremely boring because you would not have the swiss alps in the background and just a boring high-angle shot with just ground visible in the background (click here for an illustration). As for the two trees you mention, they are relevant to the chamois environment. In my opinion the image would have been much more cluttered if they were in focus (which anyway can not be the case at 600mm) and they would also be very distracting in my opinion because they would steal the attention from the chamois. So I still think that having them blured not only creates a good classical foreground, midleground, background photography which gives a 3 dimensional sense to the image but also allow to keep the attention on the main subject. Also, as already said, the foreground tree creates a perfect leading line to the subject just as many others that are present in the image. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would, would, would... if, if, if :-) So to be short, it's sometimes just a question of luck. The environment here was not so cooperative in my personal opinion, but your subjective taste is of course totally acceptable -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing how the chamois were a bit nervous, I have almost no doubt they would have fled if I stood up (but we can never be 100% certain of course). Also, I have been a dozen times to this place and I have no doubt that I was extremely lucky to cumulate multiple favorable factors for this image : 1) there is only a few days/weeks every year that you can have snow there as it is not very high in altitude and also because winters are becoming warmer and warmer lately ; 2) chamois are not often seen there (most of the time it’s just ibexes that are seen) ; 3) the picture was taken with beautiful sunset colors which is rare and lucky for wildlife photography because usually the wild animals will not be placed in a good place or you will face challenging light conditions with for example contre-jour and for this shot I was lucky that the baby chamois was well placed to not have contre-jour, it was also lucky that the chamois was not in a shadow area that would not be benefiting from the sunset colors and it was also lucky that the chamois lifted its head in a way that it could be beautifully illuminated by the soft sunsets light ; 4) the combination of all of the previous elements is extremely lucky because it is way more likely to see the chamois without snow or with no beautiful sunset colors ; 5) it was very interesting to witness how the chamois adapted to this unusual situation for them (snow covering their food and having to go to places with less snow to dig to reach the grass) ; 6) having that small baby chamois far enough from the rest of the herd (especially form the mother) was extremely lucky and allowed to isolate the subject in this big snowy fairy tail environment ; 7) 98% of the time the chamois was just eating/digging the ground with head down and it was only during a very small few seconds that it had its head up like that to monitor me (even though I just had my head, hands and camera visible for him in order to not appear threatening)(but most of the time it was the rest of the herd that kept monitoring me) ; 8) most of the time with wildlife animal you are not able to place yourself to have the elements you want in the background. For this shot I was extremely lucky to be able to have the Swiss alps in the background. 9) the chamois was really perfectly placed with all these leading lines pointing to him, which is uncommon for wildlife photography. With all these elements I honestly personally think this image is of FP level. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You see some qualities but minimize the drawbacks :-) 1) animal partially hidden at the bottom (in addition to being small in the environment), 2) background totally unclear, out of focus (not recognizable mountains) 3) unaesthetic branch. Question of visual balance -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because I honestly personally don't think they are drawbacks (and even if they were, all of the qualities of the image would outweigh them in my opinion) : 1) I don't think having feet partially hidden is a problem for ungulates (see the 15 links above) and is actually even more normal when walking on snow ; 2) for me the background is clear : there's a vast environment with only a few trees and a mountain in the background. I don't think it needs to be in focus as it would steal attention from the subject (and as said above would not be possible anyway at 600mm). The background also tells a story and is relevant to the chamois environment ; 3) I personally think the foreground branch is very aesthetic because it is beautifully covered in snow with beautiful delicate sunset colors. I also like the way they create leading lines to the subject. I understand your opinion, even if I don't agree with it, and I think everything was said. Best regards and have a nice day, -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:14, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I had a wonderful day :-)

It's very clear on the picture that the feet are hidden, not because deep in the snow but because the foreground is higher in level.

15 examples above (wow!) but all of them with animals at full size. Different from here, small mammal + partially hidden -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to hear you had a wonderful day. I understand your view about partially hidden feet and proportion. What I am saying is that not only it's not disturbing for ungulates having feet not visible but that also it is also unavoidable to have that in snow anyway, even if a few inches would have been gained by standing up (at the cost of having the animal flee away and having a way less interesting background). On some of the 15 links mentioned you will even have much greater portion not visible. I personally prefer this picture than these two FP chamois pictures I made : image n°1 and image n°2 because on these two links it's just a chamois "mugshot" and there's not much context to it. This actual image is way more special in my opinion because of the fact that it was shot in a snow environment, moreover with beautiful sunset lights, and that this picture is even is able to give a context of the chamois' environment and behavior in winter in that place. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Unavoidable"? Type "chamois in snow" on Google and you'll see almost all the pictures display the feet (example).

The number of extraordinary buildings that failed at FPC because something distracting was ruining the composition... Same case here in my view. On the surface, the animal represents maybe 3 or 4 %. The rest is like empty on a "symbolic" level. Content matters -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unavoidable on deep snow, not on undeep snow that was already flatened by walking on it. I personaly don't think the trees are distracting and that on the opposite they bring value to the composition has it's part of it's environment and explains why the chamois would prefer to be close to it. This picture has just as much "animal surface" than these ones for example : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and it is a perfectly normal thing for depicting animals in their environment. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@El Golli Mohamed with your comment saying "it's really easy for those who have never practiced wildlife photography to criticize", you certainly ignore that the best art critics in this world aren't artists themselves. They just know what they're talking about, with enough background and knowledge. Moreover, this platform is open to everyone. No diploma requested to participate. That's also valid for all the voters who support birds or very cute cats. Similarly you can also meet people having strong convictions on architecture photography without knowing anything about the subject nor the difficulty. Please stay focus on the topic, if you have something interesting to share about the content, just let us know -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What you say is not contradictory to what I said. I didn't say that it was forbidden to criticize a style of photography that you have never practiced, but that it was too easy to do so. After that, saying that you know a subject very well without ever having practiced it doesn't really convince me. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 07:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be upset or frustrated because I opposed a picture of your birds and my vote suddenly put an end to the enthusiastic series of supports. Hopefully because something true was said.

What I'm explaining concerning reviews: First, great art critics are usually not artists. Which means they don't practice at all. No painting in their hands. Only knowledge, feelings, sensibility. And they usually know what they're talking about. Same happens when you enjoy a music or a movie, you don't need to be musician nor director or comedian, you just need to master a field that is about giving fair appreciations. And criticizing an art work is never "too easy" for these professionals. Secondly, it's far more easy to cast an empty vote with nothing written, or with nothing constructive, than expressing a subjective opinion, finding the words, detailing a reasoning, and if necessary courageously going against the consensus. I appreciate Giles's works in general, but I'm sorry not all the FPCs are always promoted. And I think all the authors (myself included) often lack objectivity. That's why various points of view are necessary -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm casting empty votes like you said parceque je n'aime pas trop "étaler ma science" par ici. Je crois que je vais clore ce débat inutile. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 07:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's your way of participating. But read also the guidelines. COM:FPC "A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate". Greetings -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support It's really easy for those who have never practiced wildlife photography to criticize. It's much more complicated than photographing a building. El Golli Mohamed 19:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an unwise insult. Some of those opposing this nomination are experienced wildlife photographers. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My comment is very clear. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments must be about the photo and not about other voters Wilfredor (talk) 11:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support As a wildlife photographer, I understand the challenges that often arise when capturing images in cold climates and at high altitudes. I have gone out to photograph in temperatures of -20°C to -30°C, which is common in this region of Quebec. I have also been at 5,000 meters above sea level in the Andes (reaching there on foot without a cable car). In such conditions, it's not just tough on the stomach; I remember that taking three steps felt like running an entire stadium, the heart beats very fast, the hands feel like they are burning despite special gloves, and the stomach feels like you have diarrhea all the time. I agree that an image should speak for itself, but we must consider the circumstances: a cold and high place is very different from a photo of farm animals. I respect others' opinions, but I want to support this photo for its merit and difficulty. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent shot. I would have cropped it a bit on the left, given that there's a lot of weight on the right. That being said, I particularly like that the image shows the habitat. The bokeh of the lens is nice and in general there's nothing wrong with out-of-focus elements in an image. Thanks for uploading so many top-notch photos here, Giles! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the simplicity and spontaneity of it. Everything seems almost right about this picture as a whole, including the out-of-focus areas. The shot is aesthetically pleasing and even artistic when all parts are considered. The main theme or subject is fuzzy, uncertain, and it feels like you have to activate peripheral logic to understand it. It’s airy, minimalistic and breathes air of contemplation. I also think it is child-friendly in its innocence, many babies and young children would love it. --Argenberg (talk) 21:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/In their habitats#Artiodactyla (Even-toed Ungulates)

File:Ou-Line-Series701-N12.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 08:32:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

JR East 701 series N12 train between Nadushiko and Kawabe on the Ōu Main Line, Japan

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created by MaedaAkihiko - uploaded by MaedaAkihiko - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 08:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 08:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 02:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like trains and this is a great dynamic capture although ever so slightly out of focus (the plants in the background are sharper than the train). dllu (t,c) 03:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles

File:Пристан во Преспанското Езеро.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2024 at 22:25:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It would be great without the (somewhat ugly) white board -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 07:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely photo. B. Jankuloski (talk) 10:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't find WOW factor here. The bottom crop is a bit tight. Maybe getting a bit closer and lower would work better. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:13, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Un groupe de flamants roses à Guellala - Djerba.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2024 at 21:41:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
Info A group of Greater flamingo in Guellala - Djerba created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:41, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tunisia on top! ★ 23:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems good. As an aside, maybe we should think about delisting some older flamingo pics like File:Flamant rose Thyna009 (cropped).jpg which I think is much inferior to the present nomination both compositionally and technically (a bit grainy/low resolution). dllu (t,c) 04:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 10:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 13:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~(but I think there is a small tilt that could be fixed)~~ -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a tilt. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, after looking closer at the mini waves it doesn't seem tilted. Because of the difference of color on the water, I somehow had the impression that there was also a tilt at the faraway horizon but since the mini waves don't seem tilted, the inclination is probably perfect -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)

File:4 Bic Cristal pens and caps.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 14:13:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
Info created and uploaded by Kadellar - nominated by ★ -- ★ 14:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 14:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you, ArionStar. --Kadellar (talk) 11:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In my eyes the composition with 4 pens and 8 caps isn't convincing. --Milseburg (talk) 19:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination No chance… ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kobbet lahwé à la Marsa.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 08:23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 08:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be missing EXIF data? (I went to look for the lens type and there is only an attribution in the EXIF). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like sky and clouds here. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but motif and quality are not outstanding. Sky is noisy and there are some spots. --Milseburg (talk) 14:08, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The sky has a weird turquoise color. Oversaturated? And is very noisy, with dust spots -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: would support if the sky is denoised and cleaned up. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bunyodkor Football Stadium in Tashkent, Uzbekistan.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 11:38:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
Info created by Uzbekistan PFL - uploaded by Uzbekistan PFL - nominated by Uzbekistan PFL -- Uzbekistan PFL (talk) 11:38, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The gallery link doesn't exist. Wolverine XI 11:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info Gallery link added. It can be extended by the section #Uzbekistan in case of promotion. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Harsh light and goal net in the shadow. Maybe not the best time of the day. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 07:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin, although one more FP of Uzbekistan would be welcome of course. --A.Savin 08:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A.Savin there's one candidate from Uzbekistan under discussion now and more coming. I'm just limited by "two in one time" rule. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 04:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile; not even a QI. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Бунёдкор лучше всего снимать около полудня — когда солнце в зените, свет лучше всего будет ложиться на ворота и поле, оставляя в тени трибуны, как и задумано. Ну и в условиях более сильного освещения слабая матрица телефона не будет пересвечивать одну часть кадра и недосвечивать другую. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus) young female Kruger 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2024 at 09:03:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info A leopard 'in its habitat'. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one is better. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely better. ★ 12:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Impressive but temperature too cold? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:09, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the white balance needs further adjustment on the magenta/green axis - there is a strong magenta cast to the image. JJ Harrison (talk) 23:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:09, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)

File:Deelerwoud, 09-05-2024 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 05:43:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Betulaceae
Info Deelerwoud, (the eastern part.) Dead birch on heathland. Dead trees simply remain standing in Dutch nature reserves. They are a source of life for other life forms.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:43, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MB-one (talk) 12:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The tree is truly dead. Wolverine XI 14:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good find, well-balanced composition. – Aristeas (talk) 07:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Betulaceae

File:Helix aspersa hanging on a leaf.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 09:20:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
Info Taking into account feedback from my previous snail nomination, created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by User:Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 09:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- grendel|khan 09:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Have you not got an image with the head showing? Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Of this one? No. It was resting in a way that it was staying still for a long time. The previous nomination had a visible head, but it was on pavement, which is not its natural environment. grendel|khan 18:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is not FP, but shows a snail in good light in a natural environment. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Main subject hidden in the shadow. Cluttered background -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep… ★ 00:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kue Lumpur Pandan Jajanan Pasar Tradisional (crop).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:38:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
Info created by Alvian Choirur Rozaq - uploaded by Desertasad - nominated by Desertasad -- Desertasad (talk) 04:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Desertasad (talk) 04:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Could you please add a description in English (even with Google Translate, native speakers will fix it if needed). Yann (talk) 14:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose noticeable noise, even without zoom. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality and noise. Wolverine XI 20:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tour Magdala in Rennes-le-Chateau (9).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:36:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 04:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light and composition. The building seems to dominate over the infinite scenery. Nice flowers in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 11:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love how you captured the tower and the valley it overlooks. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 03:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for image composition, lighting, and color mood. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 10:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely flowers. Wolverine XI 14:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 10:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#France

File:Chiesa di San Michele, Savoca.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 02:27:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info Saint Michael Church, Savoca, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:22, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, no wow IMO. —kallerna (talk) 07:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very good light, but just a QI in my opinion, because the architecture is not exceptional. Flat façades -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 13:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can appreciate this sturdy old building.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Building itself is not ugly, but looks ugly because distortion correction is too strong IMHO. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by "too strong"? It is conventional to ensure that the verticals are vertical for architectural photos. To the extent it is even possible for this very old building, which has survived numerous earthquakes, so none of the verticals are actually perfect. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that the desire to make verticals vertical should not be an end in itself. I think it is much more important that the objects in the photo look natural as in real life and not resemble broken cardboard toys. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 04:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And in real life most buildings are in fact vertical, and we see them as such. This is hardly a good candidate for some sort of vertical vanishing point effect. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you're free to have your opinion and I'm free to have mine. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 07:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question to @The Cosmonaut: where's your Nikon D3300? ★ 01:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that for the well-lit scenes that don't require zoom, its image quality is not superior to my phone's. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Actually not enough wow in my eyes.--Ermell (talk) 13:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Falesia Nome e Cognome2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 02:27:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
Info: rock climbers at the Nome e Cognome crag; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would try to clone out the power line in the background --Llez (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Llez: Done --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support —Bruce1ee^talk 10:35, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:11, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily

File:William Shakespeare by John Taylor, edited.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 15:55:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info created by John Taylor / National Portrait Gallery, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support Not very high resolution, but good reproduction of a famous painting. FP on English WP. -- Yann (talk) 15:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but the quality is very low. I suggest restoring then nominating it again. Wolverine XI 19:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a historical painting, so we usually do not edit it. This one is more than 400 years old, so the cracks are a normal feature in this case. Yann (talk) 19:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:41, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вид Нижний Урунгач.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2024 at 18:47:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Uzbekistan
Info created and uploaded by Arina Pan - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 18:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 18:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Most of the image is not sharp enough in full resolution for FP --Milseburg (talk) 19:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I’d wish the focus point was a bit further away from the camera, right now the background is indeed a bit soft; but considering the resolution I think it’s still OK, and overall it’s such a beautiful scene. – Aristeas (talk) 07:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Uzbekistan

File:Domestic cat by Shagil Kannur.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 18:57:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/In their habitats#Carnivora (Carnivores)
Info Domestic cat. All by-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Need more DoF, the other cat is important too --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Wilfredor. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 22:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cute cats, but sorry, the image has a number of issues in addition to the DoF that Wilfredor pointed out. The colors are quite oversaturated and most of the greens have maximum saturation. The left cat is supposed to be in focus but is not very sharp and seems to have been aggressively sharpened in post. Domestic cats are extremely commonly photographed animals so the bar for an outstanding photo is very high in my opinion. dllu (t,c) 03:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It looks a little overprocessed too. ★ 15:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:46, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:F-16 Solo Display Team Radom 2009 b.JPG (delist)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 01:41:47

Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft. Not very sharp. Compare to this image by the same author, which is better in every way: File:F-16_Demo_Team_2722.jpg (Original nomination)
Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 01:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (was: {{FPX}}) Sorry, but only two active nominations by the same user are allowed. – Aristeas (talk) 07:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Aristeas: this is not exactly a nomination. 2804:14D:5C32:4673:DA2:DE21:DDC8:DCF1 04:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment We often say that images are “nominated for delisting” and AFAICR apply the “only two nominations” limit also to delist nominations. However I would be happy to learn that I am wrong.

Asking some users which were especially interested in rule discussions in the past – @A.Savin, Basile Morin, Charlesjsharp, Rhododendrites, W.carter – and everybody else with FPC experience: Would you say that the “only two active nominations by the same user” limit applies also to delist nominations (as I have assumed here) or would you say that one can nominate as many images for delisting as one wants?

I would argue that the limit should also apply to delist nominations.

Formal argument: the rules say “The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period”, so if not stated differently the two nominations limit should also apply to delist nominations.
Material argument: In past discussions the limit has often been justified by emphasizing (1) that nominations must be discussed carefully (we want quality, not quantity); and (2) that the FP maintenance resources are very limited. IMHO both points apply even a fortiori to delist nominations: (1) they certainly need an especially careful discussion (we all want to avoid arbitrary delisting) and (2) they mean even more work for us maintainers than normal nominations – delisting a FP always requires misc. manual edits.

How do you see this? Thank you very much for your statements! Best, – Aristeas (talk) 05:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I recall we've had a few discussions about how many delists should be allowed and always come back to the "Delists are the same as normal nominations". Mostly for the reasons that people have such mixed feelings about having delists at all, and that there is so much work in closing them and only a few users know how to do it properly, since it's all done manually.

But since this question pops up from time to time, perhaps we should add a word or two to the rules to clarify this. Such discussions belong on the FPC talk page, not on a nom since it requires input from the community. I suggest you copy these comments to that page and let the discussion continue there. --Cart (talk) 07:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are so right, Cart. We need a general discussion in order to amend the rules with an explicit rule for this case. Please continue the rules discussion on the FPC talk page. Thank you everybody! – Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Reading more carefully, the two-delist-rule is written in the delist rules: "There is a limit of two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.". Admittedly the sentence could be placed better (see FPC talk page), but this is a clear {{FPD}}. --Cart (talk) 11:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

File:Su-27UBM Radom 2009 c.JPG (delist)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 17:55:40

Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Grainy. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. – Aristeas (talk) 07:01, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corvus corax in puddle at Bonny Doon Beach.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 09:10:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
Info A raven, Corvus corax, standing in a puddle at Bonny Doon Beach in Davenport, California. Renominated since the previous nomination got no feedback. created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 09:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- grendel|khan 09:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry you didn't get feedback on the last one. Once in a while we'll see a photo that isn't quite up to anyone's standards for Featured Picture, but also isn't particularly bad enough to oppose. An all-black subject is very difficult to photograph, and while you've done a pretty good job here, the level of detail just isn't up to what people expect for birds at FPC. From looking at the ground, it looks like the focus might be just slightly past the bird. A smaller focus window and faster shutter might help. Some people might find the background a little off-putting, too (there's a lot of personal preference involved here). So in short I think you have a good photo that could be helpful to illustrate a common raven, but it's probably not going to work for Featured Picture. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see an outstanding photo - quality, composition, and light are all good but not FP good to me. The left tight crop makes the photo look unbalanced. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Санкт-Петербург, Чкаловский 46, барельеф.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 17:20:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 17:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 17:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 09:12, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice quality and cut.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mile (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs

File:Vellereille-les-Brayeux - Abbaye de Bonne-Espérance - vue depuis la cour d'honneur - 2023-09-23 - 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 14:27:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belgium
Info created by Jmh2o - uploaded by Jmh2o - nominated by Jmh2o -- JmH₂O^(talk) 14:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. --JmH₂O^(talk) 15:17, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral very slightly leaning out and sharpness could be better. --MB-one (talk) 12:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice quality but the light is quite ordinary. Dark trees with the right wing in the shade makes the photo looks unbalanced - too bright on the left, too dark on the right. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Podzemnik. --August Geyler (talk) 16:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jun Takahashi dress for Undercover (51492).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 13:07:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
Info Jun Takahashi dress for Undercover, spring/summer 2024. Featured in the Metropolitan Museum of Art exhibition "Sleeping Beauties: Reawakening Fashion". A different version of this dress got some attention when it was worn to this year's Met Gala. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Who should wear something like that?--Ermell (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support No idea how and who should wear it, but it works as a beautiful, aesthetic art object. Well captured! -- Radomianin (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MB-one (talk) 12:13, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool image. Wolverine XI 14:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- J.Stalin S ^Talk 19:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Clothing and textiles

File:Anas zonorhyncha swimming.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 13:19:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
Info created and uploaded by Alpsdake - nominated by TKsdik8900 -- TKsdik8900 (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- TKsdik8900 (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Красный ^{wanna talk?} 07:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp. --Kadellar (talk) 11:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bluebells in the Brooklyn Botanic Garden (42915p).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 13:29:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United States
Info Bluebells (Hyacinthoides non-scripta) - pretty park scene at the botanical garden. I looked up the origin of that odd "non-scripta" name. It's a mythology reference. When Hyacinthus was accidentally killed, a flower grew from his blood and Apollo's tears marked the letters AIAI on the petals. Basically this is saying "not the kind of hyacinth that has letters on it". all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 14:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment any reason to cut the road, could start from edge.--Mile (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- You mean crop out the mulch path on the right? No, I would not want to do that. I like the composition. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Probably on bottom, not right, but its tight anyway to crop. --Mile (talk) 12:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 07:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support idyllic. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#United States

File:Portrait of Wang Jingwei.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 21:00:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info created by 京都東 - uploaded by 京都東 - nominated by AESTIVUM -- SekisounoAestivum (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SekisounoAestivum (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose File size is too small and very grainy, even for an image in that year -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality and very noisy IMO. Wolverine XI 09:58, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beaumont - moulin banal et tour Salamandre - 2024-05-11 - 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 15:32:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
Info created by Jmh2o - uploaded by Jmh2o - nominated by Jmh2o -- JmH₂O^(talk) 15:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. -- JmH₂O^(talk) 15:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pleasant composition with nice light but IMO not outstanding shot. Maybe a lower point of view with more road and less sky would work better. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Facóquero común (Phacochoerus africanus), parque nacional del Lago Mburo, Uganda, 2024-02-01, DD 66.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)
Info Common warthog (Phacochoerus africanus), Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Correct focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral IMHO, The composition is not at the same level as other FPs of the same class --Wilfredor (talk) 22:05, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool animal, very good quality. – Aristeas (talk) 07:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)

File:Spectacled weaver (Ploceus ocularis ocularis) male feeding Mbombela.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 21:15:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
Info No FPs of this species. I think the garden tree may be an exotic. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - WildMouse76 (talk) 03:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but something is off here. I think it's the bird's positioning. It's not facing the camera and we can't really make out it's physique. Had the bird faced the camera in a classic stance, I'd have supported this image. The composition and crop are not a problem if you're wondering. Wolverine XI 11:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The classic stance image has FP potential, but the nominated image is more dynamic. No idea what you mean by 'not facing the camera'. Classic bird photos have the head in profile; like here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 19:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:African wattled lapwing (Vanellus senegallus senegallus).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 04:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp Judging by how you replied to this nomination, I'm assuming there's something wrong with the image. Is part of the animal out of focus? I would love to know. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 16:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it looks lovely at first glance, but I am not sure it has the sharpness and feather definition for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing Mud puddling position of Cethosia biblis (Drury,1773) - Red Lacewing.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 05:33:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Incredible specimen. Wolverine XI 09:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! --Plozessor (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 23:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing contrast between the butterfly and the background. --MB-one (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Skander zarrad (talk) 21:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 09:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per MB-one. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- J.Stalin S ^Talk 19:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 17:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)

File:060 Olive baboon walking at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 12:04:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For FP this should be identified and categorized as a juvenile Papio anubis Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the comment, caption, description, category and file name edited -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JJ Giles, you've done it again! --SHB2000 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 13:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support No words. Wolverine XI 14:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Skander zarrad (talk) 21:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 17:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)

File:Oxelaëre.- Porche de l église Saint-Martin, relief de Ste Cécile.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2024 at 09:43:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
InfoRelief, carved with the effigy of Ste Cécile represented with her zither, to the right of the portal of the Saint-Martin church. Oxelaëre (Nord, Fr).
all by me -- Pierre André ^(talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pierre André ^(talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. ★ 16:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice photo. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice photo, but in my opinion it lacks a wow factor. Also it seems slightly off center --- there's more room on the right than the left. I think the composition might be better if it were slightly wider so that the two pillars, with the cherubs on top, were fully visible. Also, the chemins des retables flag feels a little out of place but I suppose it's part of the building so there's no removing it. dllu (t,c) 20:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The full frame image is represented in thi.

Indeed, the flag of the altarpiece paths is part of the building so it is not possible to remove it. Best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 10:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 17:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Défense, Paris April 2012.jpg (delist), not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 00:50:50
→

Info Blown-out/overexposed sky on the horizon; replacing to File:La Défense at night, 24 June 2014.jpg (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- ★ 00:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace -- -donald- (talk) 06:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wrong file? this image was promoted, the other is supposed to replace, right? At first sight, the crop at the left was better in the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But the photo-processing of the latter is better. ★ 16:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The rythme generated by the curved light rail is also visually much more interesting. In any case, the photo is misleading. Reviewers might think the picture displayed in the nomination will replace the other one with a link. Whereas it is the contrary -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. ★ 11:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Too tight crop, and the curved light rail playing with the curved façade has disappeared. Composition and rythme more interesting in the promoted version -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Basile Morin, left version with curved light strings seems better.--MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A stalemate; each image has got its advantages. Perspective, colours and atmosphere may be better in the 2014 version, but the 2012 version has a better left crop and that great curved light rail. One could want to feature both of them, but for that they are too similar. – Aristeas (talk) 07:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Aristeas. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 2 delist, 2 keep, 2 neutral => not delisted. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clouded yellow Colias croceus Ichkeul.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 10:06:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support All relevant areas are naturally in focus without artificial oversharpening. Attractive subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 09:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:12, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)

File:ECB at sunrise, Frankfurt am Main (IMG 20220427 071600-RR).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 11:51:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info all by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MB-one (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very low resolution by modern standards especially for an architectural subject; and the composition could be better in my opinion. For example, the way a lamp post in the foreground is occluding one of the main pylons of the bridge. dllu (t,c) 17:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:151011-010 Hopetoun Falls.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 05:31:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria
Info created and uploaded by Faj2323 - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 10:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MB-one (talk) 11:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 12:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 22:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria

File:Raggiana Bird-of-paradise 0A2A5379.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 17:02:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paradisaeidae_(Birds-of-paradise)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The right side is very blurry. ★ 20:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not one of the rarest birds, though amazing to get a photograph; but so tricky to ignore serious technical shortcomings. I much prefer several of the other images on Commons. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is insufficient even for QI. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There are many things wrong with this. We got quality, the distracting stuff on the right, technical problems. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 02:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It's AI upscaled isn't it. but the subject and overall effect is so impressive Henrysz (talk) 03:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Upper right corner and strong blue hue. Maybe over-processed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Ivar (talk) 18:46, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dean Franklin - 06.04.03 Mount Rushmore Monument (by-sa).jpg (delist), not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 17:34:09

Info The image quality is significantly worse than existing FP File:Mount Rushmore detail view.jpg. It is only a tenth of the resolution in each dimension not to mention worse dynamic range and detail. (Original nomination)
Delist -- dllu (t,c) 17:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This wouldn't be promoted now, after someone has uploaded a 600 megapixel behemoth view of the same subject, but on its own it doesn't fall short enough of FPC standards to need delisting. It's not like this is is VIC, where there can only be one image per subject. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the original nominator. ★ 21:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even though the pictures portraits the same subject almost from the same placement, light and colors are slightly different. I agree with to others to keep both as FP, too. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Rhododendrites and Harlock81. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep --Mile (talk) 11:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 delist, 5 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grèbe castagneux Lac de Tunis.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 19:59:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Podicipedidae (Grebes)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I think the center side of the organism is a bit out of focus. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 09:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 23:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Podicipedidae (Grebes)

File:Cuernos del Paine in Torres del Paine National Park.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 17:39:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Chile
Info created by Pedro Szekely - uploaded by JustEMV - nominated by JustEMV -- JustEMV (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JustEMV (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The cloud obscuring parts of the mountain isn't visually appealing IMO. Also, the quality of the mountains isn't worthy of a FP, especially when the resolution and size are near 20 MB -- WildMouse76 (talk) 20:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Now that I think about it, the fog isn't really a problem. I'm still disturbed by the quality of the mountains. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I think that is precisely the theme, excellent cover for the book "the fog" --Wilfredor (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback! Personally, I believe the clouds add drama and enhance the scene :) JustEMV (talk) 01:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral a bit much noise. Otherwise FP worthy. --MB-one (talk) 12:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the scene. It's true that the quality of the mountains could be better, but there are many details in the foreground. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noisy ! But what a composition. Lights and colors are amazing. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Chile

File:Weg auf der Ostseite des Galgenfeldsees bei Haßfurt.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 18:32:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing! ★ 23:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak oppose~~ for the purple glare near the sun, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin: Tried to fix that purple glare, please take another look. --Plozessor (talk) 04:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still something, but almost gone - Basile Morin (talk) 06:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin: Updated it once more. --Plozessor (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good now El Golli Mohamed 07:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, yes nice autumn but otherwise nothing special for me. --A.Savin 08:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Contre-jour very well handled. --MB-one (talk) 12:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful autumn scenery. It could be worth trying to brighten up it further – underexposing was necessary here, but is to be compensated in post-processing. Of course it’s a matter of taste how bright it should get … – Aristeas (talk) 07:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thx, I did brighten the dark parts according to my taste. Actual look depends on the monitor setup ofc ... Plozessor (talk) 08:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. As I said, a matter of taste. – Aristeas (talk) 14:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support lovely autumn colors! --SHB2000 (talk) 12:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It works fine. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose With A.Savin --August Geyler (talk) 10:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

File:Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (13).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 15:21:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Croatia
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Main subject in the shadow. And low wow factor in my view because the architecture is not incredible -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 07:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support somehow --Mile (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per Basile Morin. --August Geyler (talk) 16:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Croatia

File:Zhuhai Fisher Girl statue dllu.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 17:27:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors
Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 17:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 17:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 17:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors

File:MiG-29 38.JPG (delist), not delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:35:18

Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft It's a grainy image of the undercarriage of a fighter jet. We've all seen one before. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 04:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nominator. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: I feel this can be improved with careful post-processing. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Per nom. --August Geyler (talk) 16:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 5 delist, 1 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Remote view of Jintai Temple dllu.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#China
Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 04:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (t,c) 04:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why does the water appear very grainy? --SHB2000 (talk) 04:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can only see slight grain when pixel peeping the 100 megapixel image, which I don't find distracting at all. Are you perhaps referring to the ripples reflecting the sky? dllu (t,c) 05:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe – I'll wait and see what others have to say. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those mini-ripples on the water look fine to me. It's what you get when you have a breeze blowing on a lake with no rolling waves. --Cart (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough –

Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Desertasad (talk) 05:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but per the header, only "[e]ditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." Your account only has 24 edits as of 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC). --SHB2000 (talk) 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wow, that is super high resolution. Toadspike (talk) 06:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGTM -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Resokution is great and the motif interesting, but the lighting and composition/POV are not at FP level for me. Poco a poco (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty uninteresting light and strangely washed out colours on the building. The sharpness could also be better.--Ermell (talk) 13:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree about the light. Regrettably, the sky was hazy. The colors are slightly washed out since it's very far away, but I've already applied aggressive dehazing compared to the original [1]. I'm surprised to see sharpness being mentioned since the sharpness seems fine to me on the 100 megapixel photo except perhaps for the extreme corners of the image. dllu (t,c) 20:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment To be fair, I was wrong about the sharpness.--Ermell (talk) 10:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco an Ermell. --Milseburg (talk) 19:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: mostly because I'm impressed by how skilfully dehazing was performed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for the nick-of-time support! dllu (talk) 05:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#China

File:2024-06-01 10-07-04 FortDuLomont.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 05:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ ★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There're many lens flares on the photo. ★ 15:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technical issues. Blown highlights, blue flares, lack of sharpness in the corners-- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:004 Sunrise at Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 11:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tanzania
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good light and colors but nothing seems to be really in focus. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your message. The focus was at infinity. The house on the hill for example seems in clear focus to me. Maybe because of the huge resolution of the file it was still rendering when you zoomed in? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric. The mountain and also most of the trees on the plain are in focus. I guess the impression of softness is just due to some haze which may be inevitable at these distances. – Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas; very impressive when viewed in full size. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Wonderful composition, but low DoF. Why only f/5.6? --XRay 💬 18:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. I had unfortunately no tripod with me that would allow for a slower shutter speed and smaller aperture (and even if I did, it was a little bit windy and I would not want the vegetation to have motion blur). Also the low DoF is mostly due to the 140mm I was using because the hill was quite far away and with such a zoom it's quite impossible to have the foreground in focus when the foreground is close and that you're focusing at infinity -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:52, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Tanzania

File:Sandnes City Map.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 09:37:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
Info created and uploaded by Kevinpaulscarrott - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This has got to be one of the best city directory maps created by a Commons user out there. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question There seem to be quite a few problems with the detail; naturally maps are all about accurate detail. It needs consistency of use of Norwegian/English (e.g. Gata/Gate; use of Ceramist (a person) as opposed to Ceramics/Pottery). Accommodation should be Hotel. Huset Vart seems to be a shopping centre in a converted bicycle factory, not a science factory. Do Norwegians translate Vinmonopolet as Liquor Store; the American term? I've heard them using alcohol store or using vinmonopolet when speaking English. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note from a Scandi. These days the languages (Norwegian/Swedish/Danish) spoken and written by Scandinavians contain a lot of English words and expressions, and most of us don't know the difference between pure American and British English. We learn and use a hodgepodge from what we pick up in media, films and tv shows, and try to adapt what we say so that people will understand the meaning rather than true translations. It's sort of the Scandi version of Pidgin English. Hence we use the real names of companies like 'Vinmonopolet' (in Sweden, Systembolaget has the same function) when speaking among foreign friends, but terms like 'Liquor Store' when describing it to the public in general. --Cart (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever it should be called, the Vinmonopolet is nowhere near the shown location from 2022, so you'd never find it using this map. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most maps of larger areas are outdated as soon as they are published. --Cart (talk) 14:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support El Golli Mohamed 13:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Leaning keep, but a few comments/questions: 1) why not go with the svg version? 2) It looks like File:City map stavanger.svg is the user's masterwork (in its 24th edition!). 3) Since it looks like the creator regularly updates these, does promoting it to FP prevent that updating? Would it have to be a separate file? I would support a rare exception to the prohibition on changing FPs once they're promoted in a case like this, since updates are likely just going to make it more accurate (and remove mistakes/out of date locations). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is fine, but nowhere near today's FP standards. Wolverine XI 18:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-06-01 09-15-09 FortDuLomont.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 05:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Harsh light at right. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor technically with very bad lighting. Wolverine XI 21:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kue Lapis.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 06:41:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
Info created and uploaded by Shitadevi - nominated by Desertasad -- Desertasad (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Desertasad (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Could you please add a description in English (even with Google Translate, native speakers will fix it if needed). Yann (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've made an attempt at machine translation but it's up to native speakers to fix it. dllu (t,c) 22:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support outstanding. --MB-one (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- J.Stalin S ^Talk 19:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:-i---i- (22414622307).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Abstract
Info created by Lunna Campos - uploaded by Sturm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Symmetrical impression could be better. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes of course, but the arrangement of the elements doesn't appear to be symmetrical, so there's not much to do. ★ 15:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think a more describing file name would be appreciated --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per COM:I: "Images should have a meaningful file name [...] and have an accurate description on the file page" -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 16:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escalators at the train station in Helsinki airport.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 14:14:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 14:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not exceptional in any way. Wolverine XI 19:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Nice but tilted at the top. ★ 00:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ArionStar: Sure? The roof is crooked. The picture is straight as can be seen from the handrail. Or are you referring to something else? --Plozessor (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The roof. ★ 14:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The ceiling (ceiling/teto is what you see inside a building, and a roof/telhado is what you see from the outside) is not horizontal, it is leaning and it is higher on the right side than the left side. There is nothing the photographer can do about it; unless he brings in a building team and have them reconstructing the station. --Cart (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.

Support ★ 15:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thx Cart for the clarification! Yes, the ceiling is crooked, though I think that this is because the roof is crooked ;) --Plozessor (talk) 18:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support after clarification. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Clean work on a difficult object. Thanks to Cart for the analysis :) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I can see where Remedy Entertainment got inspiration for the Oldest House... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting contemporain architecture with concrete and space, and not easy to capture without any people. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Sebring12Hrs --MB-one (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If the disruptive moiré on the escalators and the cut-off entrance are removed, I am also in favour.--Ermell (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ermell: Don't want to remove the entrance because it would kill the symmetry of the upper part, but I managed to reduced the moiré at least. --Plozessor (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations

File:Woman with rainbow-hued body makeup (17659375763).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 15:49:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Hernan Irastorza, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by Yann
Info Ruben Andon: Make up, Body art & hair: Barbara Rizzuti
Support Artsy portrait. -- Yann (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Rainbow? No. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Perfectly in time for June :-). --SHB2000 (talk) 00:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not a good file name per Commons guidelines. Please think of such things before you create nominations. Something like "Woman with rainbow-hued body makeup" would be better. Plus the description is inadequate, I'll fix that one for you. --Cart (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: OK for renaming it after closure. I don't think it is that urgently necessary to do it now. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No urgency per se, but people may be more inclined to support the nom if everything is top notch for it, plus nominators tend to forget such "minor" things once they've got their star. --Cart (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This image is technically fine, but I don't like the left-leaning nature of the subject. A centered subject is preferable, and a more expressive face is desirable. Overall, not FP in my eyes. Wolverine XI 10:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review, Wolverine XI. As far as I know, this kind of image composition is often used in documentaries to create suspense and attention. The usual harmonious placement on the right would be the less conspicuous standard. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: there are a bunch of artifacts along the upper edge of the table that need to be fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
True there's a weird rectangle and an unexplainable blurred orange zone close to it. I will support again once it's fixed. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement done (3rd editing) (SwissTransfer link) @Jeff G., Yann, The Cosmonaut, and Giles Laurent: I have removed the above mentioned artifacts and probably unnatural appearing editing marks. If you are satisfied with the improvement after checking, you are welcome to use this version for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Much better thank you! There seems to still be a blurry area close to her right shoulder (so the shoulder that appears on left on the image). There is also a blurry area close to the thumb and close to the other hand. Also, I'm wondering, is it over a table that she's placing her arms or is just a soft surface? Because it is a bit strange how the sort of white table is extremely linear just bellow the body but on the left it becomes a bit wavy (so I think it's a soft surface but that there was a white rectangle applied in postproduction bellow the body) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for the quick feedback, Giles. The messy spot on her right shoulder has been fixed and the link above has been updated with the 2nd edit. As for the table, I think it's either a soft blanket or a mattress that the model is resting her elbows on. The area in the middle at chest height was probably straightened afterwards by the creator. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G., Radomianin, The Cosmonaut, and Giles Laurent: I uploaded the version edited by Radomianin. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the update, Yann. Sorry I wasn't that fast :) Updated the link above: I removed the messy spot on the right shoulder that Giles mentioned. I'll leave it up to you if you want to do another update. If so, thanks in advance :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 19:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yann, unfortunately in my haste I forgot to edit two spots mentioned by Giles, namely those on the right thumb and the left hand. I apologize that you have to take action again, but you can wait until tomorrow after Giles has checked again. I think all the spots are fixed now. The link above has been updated. It's the best we can do to rescue the nomination :) Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and very good job Radomianin! I support the third edited version with the hands blur fixed that I guess will be uploaded soon to update the actual version Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Yann (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: much better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Many thanks for your improvements, Radomianin! – Aristeas (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Barbitistes constrictus BW 2023-09-11 16-20-45 FR.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 14:47:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Tettigoniidae (Katydids or Bush Crickets)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 90 % of the picture is blurred because only the head is in focus. And the animal is bad cropped. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop doesn't sit right with me. Wolverine XI 21:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support In macro photography Sebring12Hrs if you don't stack images with different depths of field you can't have all the animal in focus especially if it is not parallel to the lens. The photo was taken at f13, he couldn't do better--El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You don't have as big a depth of field as you do with focus-stacking though this was not taken with a macro lens. The depth of field is worse if you get in too close. Naturally, an animal in profile will have more of its body in focus than this sort of threequarter view, but Orthoptera legs and Tettigoniidae antennae are very tricky. There is seldom a reason to crop off part of an animal unless the objective is a close up. In this case a tighter crop just to show the head would make it look better, but the head isn't especially sharp so it might not be worth it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was taken with a macro lens of this kind: https://www.grainlab.com/images/product_images/original_images/pen_f_28-50_1a.jpg and is done without focus stacking because it's a living animal in nature. --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, yes it is. I've only done test photos using 50mm macro. I had to get too close, so not much good for the insect macros I take. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The animal was cut (leg and antenna), additionally the problem of depth of field, here you can see an image of a similar subject in focus and not cut --Wilfredor (talk) 12:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the photo you mentioned the subject is parallel to the lens so that's normal. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this makes it easier to solve the depth of field problem but I was referring to the problem of not cutting the animal. Wilfredor (talk) 23:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (regretfully) – makes for a good QI and VI, but not FP with that specific crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment With this crop it would fail at VI. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riedböhringen - St. Genesius 27.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 07:06:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Germany
Info Coat of arms and portrait of Cardinal Augustin Bea, ceiling painting, parish church St. Genesius, Riedböhringen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 20:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Germany

File:Billie Eilish at Pukkelpop Festival - 18 AUGUST 2019 (01) (cropped).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 16:11:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info Billie Eilish at 2019 Pukkelpop Music Festival which take place in Kiewit, Hasselt, Belgium. Created by crommelincklars - uploaded by Thomson200 - nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 16:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Background is noisy. ★ 19:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zebramanguste-Mungos-Mungo-Zoo-Duisburg-2024.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:38:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Herpestidae (Mongooses)
Comment Banded mongoose (mungos mungo)
Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Correct focus with acceptable DoF, nice composition and the subject is well lit, but I find the bright spot top left a little distracting. BigDom (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I'd prefer the background to be all black. Wolverine XI 10:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Herpestidae (Mongooses)

File:Balzender-Blauer-Pfau-Zoo-Duisburg-2024.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:47:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, insufficient compositional quality for a common animal. Part of the organism is obscured and the background is busy. dllu (t,c) 22:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distracting back- and foreground, and subject in shadow, sorry. BigDom (talk) 02:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful peafowl but a less than stellar composition. Wolverine XI 10:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 19:32:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info Lonely Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh, far from souk). My shot. --Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing out of the ordinary. Just a man with his sheep. Or am I missing something? Wolverine XI 10:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Wolverine, also some parts (like the sheep's neck) are blurry without an apparent reason. --Plozessor (talk) 15:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Wolverine 11. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support great composition. --MB-one (talk) 12:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: the light is not ideal, but very expressive somehow. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition! Henrysz (talk) 03:12, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ecokathedraal, 29-04-2024 (actm.) 06.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 04:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
Info Ecocathedral in Mildam municipality of Heerenveen, Part of surplus building material stacked in a special way. (This is a special project that will continue until the year 3000).
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose interesting subject and technically a good shot. But the composition and contrast is not FP worthy to me. --MB-one (talk) 12:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty boring to say the least. Wolverine XI 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The quality is good--El Golli Mohamed 13:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Busy composition and odd angle, in my view. A bit of tree, a bit of wall, a bit of stairs, and a partially hidden building. No wow, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 19:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cartina della Toscana alla fine del tredicesimo secolo.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 08:41:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
Info created by Anna.Massini - uploaded by Anna.Massini - nominated by Anna.Massini -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality. Wolverine XI 19:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CommentI applied because there are no maps of this topic on wikimedia and I think it is interesting. Does anyone else think like me? - p.s. quality photos were recognized — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna.Massini (talk • contribs)

You have created a beautiful map, but unfortunately a mobile phone is not the best way to digitize such a work for FP, since it creates very sharp contrasts and artifacts that are ruining you work and the resolution is also rather low. If you have something flat like this, it's often better to use a scanner with high resolution so that the details can be appreciated. Also the long text here should be on the file page, not the nomination. An explanation like that should be where people can find it easily and read it. This nom will be archived in a week or so and almost no one will see it. Did you write the text yourself, or did you use AI/ChatGPT or something? I'm asking because the length and the words of it are similar to what we have seen here before. --Cart (talk) 09:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I don't have the map available for the scanner, furthermore the format would be too large to be scanned anyway, so I simply photographed and placed the verticals and horizontals straight, and it wasn't easy either.I added the text in the description. It is a text, but not composed with artificial intelligence, only translated with Google Translate. Thank you.(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nominationi withdraw (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 15:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 15:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caldeira Grande 2023-02-25.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Caldeira Grande, Furnas, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The Cosmonaut in Portugal! World traveler! ★ 12:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:17, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's some lack of interest in voting for certain photos (on the part of the community); why? I don't know… ★ 01:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the interest is subjective and can't really be rationalised. So, I choose not to worry about it :-) --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 t.JPG (delist), delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 16:40:29

Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). There is a distressing amount of chromatic aberration in this photo. Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist : very blurry --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Indeed poor quality even for its time. – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per Schierbecker and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. --August Geyler (talk) 16:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /WildMouse76 (talk) 21:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forester kangaroo (Macropus giganteus tasmaniensis) juvenile hopping Esk Valley.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 10:29:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Macropodidae (Macropods)
Info No FPs of the subspecies endemic to Tasmania. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see it hopping...Wolverine XI 21:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Not a huge fan of the open field, but everything else works. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, kangaroo's mouths are adapted to cut grass really short, which is why their habitat often looks like a mown lawn. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In Tasmania, at least. In the mainland, it's fairly normal to see kangaroos in dense bushland. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Tanzania and Tasmania! ★ 13:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Where is Tanzania coming from? Wolverine XI 18:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination above. ★ 20:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Macropodidae (Macropods)

File:Bloem van een Oenothera stricta 'Sulphurea'. 30-05-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 05:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Onagraceae
Info Closed flower of a Oenothera stricta 'Sulphurea' (Night bloomer) Focus stack of 54 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 17:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

* Support Lotje (talk) 04:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC) * Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Info Unfortunately, the last two supporting votes were added after the final count by the FPC bot. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Onagraceae

File:Arenal (Parapercis pacifica), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-22, DD 120.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 15:40:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Trachiniformes
Info Sandperch (Parapercis pacifica), Anilao, Philippines. We have no FPs of this species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wait, is it that a frog fish I see on the sea floor? Wolverine XI 18:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The background is so distracting. I can hardly see the subject. wait... Henrysz (talk) 03:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm impressed by the camouflaged creature. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Two heads? ★ 01:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:30, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Order : Trachiniformes

File:Photograph of Gustave Doré by Nadar, between 1856 and 1858.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 00:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1850-1859
Info created by Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question I get that the noise is authentic to the source photograph, but wouldn't it be even better to remove it digitally? --MB-one (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That kind of cleanup tends to give a very unnatural look. (I did spend a great deal of time removing the dust, though) Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Adam. He knows what he is doing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nadar was a top photographer of his time… ★ 02:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical/People#1850-1859

File:Schwerin Castle (2).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 04:43:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 04:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 04:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the weather wasn't great, but I think the water reflection is a plus.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Water reflexion still works well. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Lovely photo. - Jmabel ! talk 00:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Famberhorst -- Radomianin (talk) 12:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really want to go there someday...and that's a nice reflection. Toadspike (talk) 09:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Mecklenburg-Vorpommern

File:Flock of gulls in Cape May (20662).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 02:56:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Leucophaeus
Info Thousands of gulls come to this beach just after high tide this time of year, just after all the horseshoe crabs have come ashore to lay their eggs. It's a feeding frenzy spectacle. At one point, something spooked them and they took to the air. We were standing out on a mud flat at the time and it sort of felt like they were circling us -- very loud and kind of surreal (and somehow we escaped without getting anything falling on us). This is my effort at capturing the chaotic moment, quickly snapping five frames for a panorama. The vast majority of these birds are laughing gulls (Leucophaeus atricilla), but there are several herring gulls, too, as well as Canada geese and mallards. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support An impressive scene. Reminds me of a famous movie quote: “Have you ever seen so many seagulls? What do you suppose it is?” -- Radomianin (talk) 05:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It's horseshoe crabs! :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there are some stitching errors on birds (imo nothing serious). I would be happy to support, if they are addressed. -- Ivar (talk) 19:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for taking the time to annotate -- I'll look at this and fix tonight. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- New version uploaded — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Iifar for spotting the flaws that I also missed, and thanks to Rhododendrites for the fixes that have improved the image. Unfortunately there are blue edge repetitions below the wings in many places. They resemble chromatic aberration, but apparently are not. Maybe you can do something about that. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment two birds left with half of the wing, one of them is small (and far away). -- Ivar (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Iifar: Done Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Stitching photos is difficult and sometimes (as in this case) painful. So that everyone can appreciate your work, it would be nice to see the 5 individual photos. However, I'm curious to see the corrections you're making. --Terragio67 (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Really good... Support Terragio67 (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! ★ 01:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Leucophaeus

File:Кронштадт, морской собор сверху зимой.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 15:57:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A successful aerial shot for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Jmabel ! talk 00:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice and moody aerial shot! --SHB2000 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit monotonous in colors, but quite good. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 04:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done! ★ 01:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tikted to the left --Llez (talk) 15:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any tilt here, but corrected perspective a bit. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 21:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK --Llez (talk) 04:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice photo! Toadspike (talk) 09:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia

File:Macaca sylvanus - Vogelpark Steinen 10.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 08:40:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info Barbary macaque father and mother with baby; created by Llez| - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose technically a good shot, but not outstanding to me. Especially the shadow in the background doesn't help. --MB-one (talk) 11:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No focus on the eyes, and the shadows are quite annoying. Wolverine XI 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shadow in the background, I'd also prefer lower point of view. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak supportThe shadows are a downside, but the baby steals the show.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 16:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Henrysz (talk) 03:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shadows, captive animals Poco a poco (talk) 06:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gray catbird watching hawk (42953).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 02:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Mimidae (Mockingbirds and Thrashers)
Info I was watching this gray catbird (Dumetella carolinensis) when a red-tailed hawk flew overhead. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm impressed. Wolverine XI 19:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The hawk to the catbird is like a helicopter to a kid --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Spectacular. Toadspike (talk) 09:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Mimidae (Mockingbirds and Thrashers)

File:California State Capitol (top), NW view up.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 04:49:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info Northwest view upwards to the pediment, rotunda, and dome of the California State Capitol in Sacramento. I wanted to make the bright dome stand out well against a dark blue sky. The camera location was about 30 meters away from the building. Perspective distortion correction has been applied, more would look unnatural. What do you think, is the chosen gallery Architectural elements#Others appropriate or should Architecture/Exteriors#United States be chosen instead? I was a bit unsure, thanks in advance for your feedback. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The view upwards to the pediment and the dome with the flags in front of it was particularly impressive to me. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect symmetry, interrupted only by the banners proudly fluttering in the breeze, beautiful lateral light which emphasizes the three-dimensionality of the sculptures, great blue/white contrast which is, again, broken only by the banners. As the photo shows big parts of the building, I would favour Architecture/Exteriors#United States. – Aristeas (talk) 07:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback, Aristeas. I have updated the gallery accordingly. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great shot, well done. I'm just wondering, how many photos will you have tried? And..., if I may ask: with a slower exposure, would you have had flags motion and/or a brighter blue sky? I don't want to criticize your work, it's just curiosity. --Terragio67 (talk) 01:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Terragio67. My aim was to capture all the details of the white facade's structures in the bright light and contrast them well against a dark blue sky. A narrower aperture and longer exposure resulted in blown highlights and less detail on the white facade. In addition, I didn't have a tripod with me at the time. I took quite a few shots of this detail also at other ISO settings. But there are only three left because I deleted the most useless ones. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 05:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TY very much for your prompt reply. Terragio67 (talk) 17:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fun fact, I had a similar idea in File:California State Capitol (top), NW view up dllu 2018.jpg but much worse lighting and I accidentally cut off the left corner. dllu (talk) 22:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The light has its charm: nice coloration by the evening light of the summer sun, too bad about the cut off left corner, dllu. I was just wondering why I hadn't seen this pretty shot in the category before, until I realized that you had just uploaded it yesterday :) -- Radomianin (talk) 05:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Radomianin! I only uploaded it after seeing your nomination. Actually, that reminded me to go through my Sacramento pictures and I just uploaded File:Blue hour front view of California State Capitol dllu 2018.jpg as well! dllu (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good opportunity, very nice :) This shot is charming. Too bad there are people sitting in front of it, but that's hard to avoid on location. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Strong oppose~~ Strong support What a ~~dreadful~~ splendid photo of a ~~horrible~~ magnificent building! --SHB2000 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 20:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States

File:A Light painting round left move.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:16:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others (It is a combination of light painting and ICM)
Info created and uploaded by Ibirapuera - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good fow factor. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Podzemnik: Wow factor? ★ 16:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Resolution could be better, really good composition. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Am I crazy? I don't think this is a photograph at all.. Look at how the lines differs in thickness when they're being stretched VS when being compressed... this is just a bunch of lines with a swirl filters on it and blending layers Henrysz (talk) 03:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I feel strange bc everyone is supporting this and I can't understand why. This picture seems like a very distorted image from my IR heat camera. I'm with Henrysz here. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 11:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 20:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others

File:Grey-headed Honeyeater 0A2A3929.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 18:54:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Meliphagidae_(Honeyeaters)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 01:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JJ, you've done it again. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Spectacular. Wolverine XI 05:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support so many nice bird photos... Toadspike (talk) 09:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)

File:Anguila listón azul (Rhinomuraena quaesita), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-23, DD 60.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 20:45:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Muraenidae (Moray Eels)
Info Ribbon eel (Rhinomuraena quaesita), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 21:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family : Muraenidae (Moray Eels)

File:Pie grieche grise.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 16:34:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Laniidae (Shrikes)
Info created by skander zarrad - uploaded by skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This other image from Tunisia is not quite FP but I much prefer it to this nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 09:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes eudamippus Doubleday, 1843 - Great Nawab 8.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 11:03:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 11:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 11:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great compo! Wolverine XI 19:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 16:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)

File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes bharata C. & R. Felder, 1867 - Indian Nawab 11.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2024 at 14:43:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 14:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 14:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

Sorry but only two active nominations by the same user are allowed.--El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He/She is a novice user here in the FPC section; so I think we can make a exception… ★ 17:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. This is how most of us have learned the rules. The hard way. But after more than ten years, you are still trying to find ways to bend them. Don't teach that to newbies, that's not helping. --Cart (talk) 17:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure the user has learned their lesson now, but this photo is too good not to be featured. ★ 21:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is a good photo, and they are very welcome to nominate it again as soon as one of the other noms is finished. --Cart (talk) 21:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Црква „Св. Илија“ - Капиново 8.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2024 at 22:38:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much noise IMO, an HDR with a tripod would probably have had a better result. --Llez (talk) 09:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And the lighting is also very difficult Poco a poco (talk)

I withdraw my nomination --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Согленски манастир.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2024 at 22:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much underexposed for FP. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Extreme distorsions at 10 mm -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aix galericulata (Female), Richmond Park, UK - May 2013.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 16:07:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Aix
Info created and uploaded by Diliff - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Too tight crop and overall not better than existing FPs of this species. Poco a poco (talk) 09:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think we should be providing a platform for images from someone that engages in copyleft trolling, would hate to see more small-time users extorted for €400+. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Please refrain from using language that says that an identifiable person is committing an illegal act and please retract that statement so it's less inflammatory. We should keep cool heads in this matter. Abzeronow (talk) 19:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --WildMouse76 (talk) 18:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portale della Chiesa di San Michele.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:53:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
Info: portal of the Saint Michael Church, Savoca, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose While I see this photo as a superior to full scale chapel (if you can't step further from the object — shoot the details), this picture is lacking wow and is blurred on the top. Maybe a QI but not a FP IMO, sorry. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 09:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like this composition with the oculus a lot better than the cropped alternative below, but unfortunately the sharpness is lacking as Красный mentioned. dllu (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Info: square crop without the oculus. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad crop, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 07:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday, 1842) - Spotted Sawtooth 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 04:04:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 10:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Theklan (talk) 10:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The yellow portions of the wing seem a bit too bright for me. (example). --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Colours look unnatural IMO- --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful --Kritzolina (talk) 10:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)

File:Courvite Isabelle Jbil NP 002.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 21:49:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Glareolidae (Pratincoles and Coursers)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing camouflage. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not sure why it needs the camouflage. Wolverine XI 19:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better than the other nomination --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 17:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Glareolidae (Pratincoles and Coursers)

File:Un pecheur rentre au port au lever du jour à kerkennah - vue large - tunisie.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 09:52:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
Info A fisherman returns to the port at daybreak in Kerkennah The photo was taken from a fishing tool used to catch octopus; created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by نعيم قربوسي -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What an innovative composition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: would support if horizon is straightened; very impressive otherwise. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the horizon, thanks for the suggestion :) Skander zarrad (talk) 15:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, I can now

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Skander zarrad: Please correct tilt as noticed above Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to, just I'm not at home for the next 4 days, but I'll take care of it as soon as I get back, I promise, thank you for your comment :) Skander zarrad (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest people vote on the basis that the tilt will be sorted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning composition. --August Geyler (talk) 11:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Different and nice. ★ 12:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! ~~for an untilted version~~ -- Radomianin (talk) 17:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for straightening it, now it's perfect :) -- Radomianin (talk) 09:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Creative composition but the blurry foreground ruins it, sorry. Because it makes the whole image too busy and cluttered. Imagine the picture without these distracting elements, it would be much better. Although the contrejour is average, with lack of detail, poor contrasts, and blown highlights -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive story-telling composition, linking natural objects, playing with the themes of sea, sun and fishing, rationally, consistently, at the same time transcending on several axes, effectively making it three-dimensional. Pleasant light and good technical quality. --Argenberg (talk) 22:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you very much :) Skander zarrad (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely composition --XRay 💬 18:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Charles, Argenberg, XRay. – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin, sorry. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wow but per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support good enough, good composition --Mile (talk) 08:50, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Tools

File:Казанский собор, колоннада 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 21:20:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info created and uploaded by Екатерина Борисова - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 21:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 21:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Zzzs (talk) 03:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:1963 Airstream trailer in Joshua Tree dllu.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 21:14:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Other land vehicles
Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good lights and relaxing atmosphere. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Especially effective in full-screen mode, the scene conveys a pleasant atmosphere. Technical note: I discovered some white pixels in the upper part, probably caused by the long exposure time. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, uploaded a new version with hot pixels removed. Every time I take an airplane, more hot pixels appear in my camera... dllu (talk) 01:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:01, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Sebring12Hrs Poco a poco (talk) 13:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special mood -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely atmosphere. Wolverine XI 18:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:44, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Other land vehicles

File:Faial Caldera panorama2.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2024 at 18:57:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Faial Caldera, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much of the caldera in shadow. The weather was fine, which doesn't happen often there, but the time of the day not the best. Poco a poco (talk) 13:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but the clouds. Wolverine XI 18:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:26, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trier, 09-12-2023 (actm.) 02.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2024 at 04:36:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Others Detail of building.
Info Trier, Roter Turm, Trier, Konstantinplatz. Sculpture at the gate. Detail of a monumental building.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:36, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hard for me to see something outstanding here, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 14:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Statue itself is not outstanding, so you can't produce anything spectacular. Wolverine XI 21:05, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Collection of historical CPUs.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 14:41:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info Focus-stacked image of a bunch of historical CPUs created by Martijn Boer - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose What can I say...except that the crop is a little shaky. Wolverine XI 18:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! ★ 23:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support very cool Henrysz (talk) 03:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minnivola pyxidata (Box Scallop), featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2024 at 15:39:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Right valve
Left valve

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Pectinidae
Info Minnivola pyxidata has an intersting shell. Whereas the right valve is convex and barely or not coloured, the left valve is concave with different shades of brown; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 15:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 15:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 17:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely! Wolverine XI 21:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Pectinidae

File:Europäische Wildkatze im Wildpark Schloss Tambach 8.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2024 at 07:32:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 07:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The light is fine, unfortunately the front legs are cut -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Henrysz (talk) 05:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The shadows and bottom crop. Wolverine XI 21:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop is unpleasant --Zzzs (talk) 21:25, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calidris Alba on one foot at Caspersen Beach.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 06:44:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Pluvialis
Info created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 06:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- grendel|khan 06:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are 4 pictures already featured for this species, which show greater details of the plumage. Anyhow, this photo shows an interesting pose of the bird. The eye could have been sharper. Very nice picture. Maybe, my support will result just a moral one, but nice done! --Harlock81 (talk) 11:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For sure it's not a Calidris alba it's a Pluvialis squatarola El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you a lot for the warning. I modified the description accordingly. I will ask for the renaming of the file at the end of the procedure. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The gallery also needs to be changed. You are welcome. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks again. --Harlock81 (talk) 08:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, thank you for figuring that out. I will change the file name and categories and depictions for this and related pictures. I assume that changing the name should wait until after the FPC process? grendel|khan 18:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:51, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Look, another birdie! Wolverine XI 21:19, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Pluvialis

File:Ilhéus da Madalena.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 17:21:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Madalena Islets flanking the city of Horta, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool! Wolverine XI 18:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question Hello, your work is really cool, but, can you check and retouch some evident stitching errors? (Added notes...) --Terragio67 (talk) 13:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for catching these! Fixed 2 stitching errors. The area you marked on the right is actually not an error; it's this structure. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Better now, thanks.

Support Terragio67 (talk) 03:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Landscape checks out --WildMouse76 (talk) 14:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:25, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Portugal

File:Zara Larsson @ The Observatory OC 05 02 2019 (48498569766).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 19:54:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Events
Info Zara Larsson performing live at The Observatory OC in Santa Ana, Orange County, California. Created by Justin Higuchi - uploaded by Tm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 19:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Looking at the metadata. Is it Astrid Smedplass or Zara Larsson?--Peulle (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty sure she is Zara. ★ 12:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: nice composition --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice dynamic. —Bruce1ee^talk 06:37, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support BW work nice.--Mile (talk) 08:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! Wolverine XI 21:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Photo techniques/Black and White#Events

File:14 de julio día de despedidas (29969735828).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 10:05:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info created by San Fermin Pamplona Navarra - uploaded by Theklan - nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Theklan (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (regretfully). Awkward crop and composition. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Extremely busy and poor composition. Wolverine XI 21:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Felipa Guisasolak damaskinatutako markoa - xehetasuna.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2024 at 08:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created by Armagintza Museoa - uploaded by Theklan - nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 08:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Theklan (talk) 08:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not special enough. Wolverine XI 18:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Larus occidentalis (Western Gull), Point Lobos, CA, US - May 2013.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 19:19:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus
Info created and uploaded by Diliff - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow 👌 Wolverine XI 21:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support focus and sharpness are incredible if you consider that the photo is from 2013. --Terragio67 (talk) 01:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think we should be providing a platform for images from someone that engages in copyleft trolling, would hate to see more small-time users extorted for €400+. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ever heard of the phrase "separate the art from the artist"? Wolverine XI 19:05, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Adding onto that, the deletion request seems to be leaning towards {{Keep}}, which some users that regularly participate in FPC have opposed its deletion, so I wouldn't worry too much about that. Just my two cents. Also, I apologize if I wasn't supposed to use the Keep template. WildMouse76 (talk) 19:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WildMouse76, you should listen to your better angels. ;-) The phrase 'Keep' has been turned into text instead of the blue dot, since it is a voting symbol and shouldn't be used in other cases. It may screw up the counting for FPC Bot. --Cart (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WildMouse76, these are two separate things. In the deletion request, we're discussing ways to prevent Commons from passively enabling copyleft trolling, and the two proposed solutions (deletion and forced watermarking) have serious side-effects that need to be considered. Here, there's no side-effect to not promoting a couple of 10 year-old pictures of common bids. On the other hand, by promoting them we'll be actively helping companies such as Pixsy (and the photographers that engage their services) in extorting users by exploiting a loophole in Creative Commons licences. Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment here. I don't have a problem with Commons FP voters opposing and linking to the DR but it is completely unacceptable on a WMF platform to make potentially libellous claims about illegal activity by named individuals ("extortion" is a crime, not a word to be casually flung about in writing). I know that on Twitter people can't help making a point without reminding the universe how horrible the horrible people are, but we're here to review which are our finest pictures. To the extent that licensing enforcement becomes an concern for that, we need to be restrained in our remarks. I hope that is clear, but if not please discuss on the DR. -- Colin (talk) 16:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have done so:[2] Julesvernex2 (talk) 17:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support ★ 19:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There are thousands of gull images and even 691 images of this Larus occidentalis sub-species alone. IMHO, to get to FP, the image has show more wow and a full view of the feet as well. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Larus

File:Oxelaëre le porche en2018 l'église Saint-Martin.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 15:06:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
Info Oxelaëre (départment du Nord, France), portal of the St Martin's church decorated with medallions carved with effigies of King David represented with his harp on the left, and Saint Cecilia with a zither on the right
all by me -- Pierre André ^(talk) 15:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pierre André ^(talk) 15:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful symmetry.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed on the cornice. It seems there are stiching errors. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sebring12Hrs: Done correction of overprocessing on the cornice. Note that the church is a building of medieval origin built on an inclined plane File:Oxelaere Eglise Saint Martin (3).jpg. Best regards --Pierre André ^(talk) 14:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I don't see any difference. The very first version had no problem with this. Here we can eaasely see the stiching errors. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, thank you for the comments. Did I miss something? The photo has not been the subject of any assembly. How could the sewing errors have been generated?. Best regards Pierre André ^(talk) 08:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Harmonious and appealing composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good enough. Wolverine XI 21:16, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Doors

File:Entire-embroidery-magna-carta-cornelia-parker - edit1.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2024 at 09:04:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
Info created by Cornelia Parker / British Library, uploaded by Bammesk, nominated by Yann
Info Magna Carta (An Embroidery), a 40 foot / 13 m long embroidery of the Wikipedia article Magna Carta, conceived by Cornelia Parker, commissioned by the Ruskin School of Art, as exhibited at the British Library in connection with their Magna Carta exhibition, May to June 2015.
Support Quite unusual. Please see File:Art in Salisbury Cathedral 2023, 04.jpg and File:Installation view of Magna Carta (An Embroidery).png to have an idea of the size of this work. FP on English Wikipedia. -- Yann (talk) 09:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special, really. Wolverine XI 20:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I agree, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments and votes. Yann (talk) 09:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babosa de mar (Chromodoris willani), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-24, DD 34.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2024 at 06:31:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Gastropoda
Info Willan's chromodoris (Chromodoris willani), Anilao, Philippines. This 5 centimetres (2.0 in)-long nudibranch can be found in the Western Pacific Ocean and feeds, like many other nudibranchs, on sponges. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:16, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:39, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 16:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 21:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:24, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Weird but cool. Wolverine XI 21:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Color and shape -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 15:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class : Gastropoda

File:Ilulissat panorama from SW large.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2024 at 10:52:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Greenland
Info City of Ilulissat, Greenland. Created by HylgeriaK - uploaded by HylgeriaK - nominated by HylgeriaK -- HylgeriaK (talk) 10:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- HylgeriaK (talk) 10:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Impressive. —Bruce1ee^talk 11:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:30, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:13, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The ocean tides may be a little too close...it could flood the coastline in a couple years. Wolverine XI 18:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:03, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 21:56, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very generous resolution, and impressive subject, with all these colors. Striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:01, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 18:12, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Probably there is a lite distortion on the left side, where the sea seems to curve uphill. But for an overall assessment I take my hat off. -- Terragio67 (talk) 07:32, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mile (talk) 08:25, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Greatly changes my mental image of Greenland. --Tagooty (talk) 03:50, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Красный ^{wanna talk?} 11:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 28 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:27, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Greenland

File:Wreckage from Key Bridge Collapse (240326-A-SE916-9511).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2024 at 13:17:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2020-now
Info Wreckage from Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse, Baltimore metropolitan area, Maryland, United States. Created by David Adams - uploaded by AntiCompositeNumber - nominated by ★ -- ★ 13:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 13:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:29, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not something you see everyday. Wolverine XI 18:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Historic! dllu (talk) 20:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:34, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:50, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:36, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Never though this event was going to be in a FP --Zzzs (talk) 17:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:22, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Double vote! 😂 ★ 22:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#2020-now

File:Oxelaëre.- Porche de l église Saint-Martin, relief Roi David.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2024 at 10:33:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
InfoRelief, carved with the effigy of King David represented with his harp, to the left of the portal of Saint-Martin church. Oxelaëre
all by me -- Pierre André ^(talk) 10:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pierre André ^(talk) 10:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oxelaëre le porche en2018 l'église Saint-Martin.jpg, already promoted, was better, with the flowers and the symmetrical composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination @Basile Morin: Thanks for your advice , best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand prismatic spring.jpg (delist)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2024 at 21:31:35

Info Low quality, poor detail, and small resolution and file size have led to its delisting from the Spanish and English Wikipedias. Both were later replaced by this image. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Zzzs (talk) 21:31, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – this is still far better than many images from 2005. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SHB2000 We have older images that are much better than this photo. This photo should not be an exception, considering it was taken by the US government, which naturally has older images of higher quality (e.g. STS-1). This image does not meet the current FP standards and expectations, even for its time. Many images from this period that were nominated for featured picture status have since been delisted, and this image is no exception. -- Zzzs (talk) 05:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are plenty of FPs today that don't meet current standards; doesn't mean that it alone should be grounds for a delist. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep May not be FP today, but still impressive colors. Yann (talk) 11:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Zzzs (talk) 14:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist You can find argentic pictures that are better from this one. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aerial view of two cotton harvesters making horizontal stripes in Batesville, Texas field.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2024 at 10:52:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Other land vehicles
Info created by U.S. Department of Agriculture - uploaded by Bee good-e - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:52, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks great as thumbnail but the quality is just too poor, the exposure time was too long resulting in unsharp combines, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A shame both tractors are out of focus. Maybe depth of field too low at F/5,6, or time 1/30s too long. Agree the thumbnail looks great at first sight -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty sure 1/30s is too long. f/5.6 won't have any issues with DOF at this distance, especially considering the camera is a 1 inch sensor. dllu (talk) 16:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 07:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tapsi Miniature Poodle Galloping Contraction Harangi Coorg Apr24 A7C 10646.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2024 at 03:44:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Canidae_(Canids)
Info A miniature poodle galloping at full contraction. The poodle is 14 inches (36 cm) high at the shoulder and head+body length is 23 inches (58 cm). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 03:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 03:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Only 2,336 × 1,557 pixels, with large background, sorry, too low resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Same as per Morin. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 09:17, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the reviews. --Tagooty (talk) 09:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ammomane élégante Jbil.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 21:44:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 22:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose A high quality shot, but neither the compo, nor subject nor POV is expectional to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 08:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you mean by POV point of view? If that's what you mean, well you should know that I was lying on the ground on my stomach and camouflaged to take this photo and have a POV at bird's eye level and I can tell you that it hurts with the stones and pebbles under my knees and elbows. I had to close to f9 to get good sharpness of the bird because I was so low. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice birdie...Wolverine XI 21:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 10:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)

File:Бухара.Мечеть Абу-Хавси-Кабир.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2024 at 09:15:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created and uploaded by Vladimir Goncharenko - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 09:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 09:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 13:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Religion is so beautiful --Zzzs (talk) 12:51, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good colors, but not enough wow for a support. Wolverine XI 21:01, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Evocative composition --Tagooty (talk) 03:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:42, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Slightly distorted (curved) on the left side, but still FP IMHO. --Terragio67 (talk) 17:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:40, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Heidelberg Castle - Friedrichsbau Facade - 3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 16:32:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 16:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- imehling (talk) 16:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a great perspective. Wolverine XI 18:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tournasol7's style. ★ 22:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Wolverine XI -- Karelj (talk) 11:20, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Baden-Württemberg

File:Deelerwoud, 09-05-2024 (d.j.b.) 16.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2024 at 04:21:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
Info Deelerwoud, (the eastern part.) Oak with emerging young leaves and a dead tree in front of it.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:21, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:32, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Life and death standing side by side. Wolverine XI 20:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support That tree must be a phoenix --Zzzs (talk) 20:59, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 22:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stark but beautiful --Tagooty (talk) 03:33, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice at the beginning, but slightly overexposed and too much clarity / contrast in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 16:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support If the overexposure was done to emphasize the harsh of the dead tree, for me this photo works as depicted. --Terragio67 (talk) 17:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:09, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Fagaceae

File:Double decker 7 bus in Edinburgh.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 21:46:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Trucks and buses
Info It was particularly challenging to get the people in the bus clearly visible as well. created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 21:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- grendel|khan 21:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some perspective correction on the right… ★ 01:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done Fixed perspective; I hope it's okay to do that in-place, as there are no (non-me) votes in yet. grendel|khan 21:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:55, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: nicely executed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:59, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The composition is not outstanding. Wolverine XI 21:13, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing found WOW to me. Sorry. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 09:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Capsules of the Nakagin Capsule Tower dllu.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2024 at 00:48:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Japan
Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by User:dllu -- dllu (talk) 00:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (talk) 00:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! Directly from another planet! ★ 01:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting and a really good composition --Kritzolina (talk) 10:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop is bad. Wolverine XI 21:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would have loved to get a better crop but unfortunately there was a highway overpass blocking the bottom of the building, as seen in File:Nakagin Capsule Tower 2017 dllu.jpg. Also, the elevated pedestrian bridge I was standing on ends such that I can't take a few more steps towards the right to shoot it straight on. Oh well, I won't get another chance to photograph this again since the building was demolished in 2022. dllu (talk) 23:39, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I don't understand Wolverine XI's vote either – I fail to see how any other crop would result in a nicer-looking image. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for your explanations of the local circumstances. Considering that the building no longer exists, I think this solidly done detail shot deserves a promotion. Even though the lighting could have been better, the shot has its charm. It reminds me of Syd Mead's dirty, worn sets for Blade Runner. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Wolverine XI -- Karelj (talk) 15:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the mood. But the rather unbalanced crop and upwards tilted perspective makes it not outstanding for me. --August Geyler (talk) 20:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jägerpfad unterhalb der Mainleite bei Schweinfurt 3.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2024 at 07:35:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 07:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sebring12Hrs 10:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, nothing special for me. --A.Savin 12:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special for me. ★ 15:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The view behind might be more interesting than the hand rail, sorry. Technically, halos around the leaves -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin, IMO "the view behind" would be just an ordinary vegetated slope, while the combination of path/handrail/slope pictures the typical scenery of that area. As for the halos, I was unable to spot any but I've uploaded a new version with more fine-tuned conversion settings. Plozessor (talk) 14:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now there are also strong purple chromatic aberrations, most visible at the upper right corner.

If the main subject is the path, then it seems industrial (made of concrete), and lacks charm in my opinion. Moreover, the crop is too tight, there. The composition needs to breathe. The hand rail is somewhat ordinary, and the view obstructed by featureless trees -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main subject is not the path itself but the typical scenerey of that area, the "Jägerpfad" ("hunters' path") at the "Mainleite". I've been there as a child, and seeing a picture like this would immediately have reminded me of these walks (contrary to a picture of the path or the slope alone). As can be seen from other pictures or from Komoot, this path/handrail/slope combination is what makes the experience. Btw, the path is compacted ground, not concrete. Reverted the picture to the previous version now, maybe you can explain which halos you meant or add a note. --Plozessor (talk) 05:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We've all been a child, but with different experiences. The first version had white halos around the leaves with blue sky behind, as if the picture was overprocessed. The colors look a bit weird, like too bright and artificial, in my opinion. The second version had purple CAs. Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin --WildMouse76 (talk) 21:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin -- Karelj (talk) 11:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hand rail is frustrating. Wolverine XI 21:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question @Wolverine, @Basile Morin, since the handrail seems really disturbing to you, do you think that any other picture from Category:Jägerpfad (Mainleite Schweinfurt) or Category:Bismarckhöhe (Schweinfurt) could quality for FP? --Plozessor (talk) 16:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:La ronda de noche, por Rembrandt van Rijn.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2024 at 11:15:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Groups
Info Rembrandt: The Night Watch, 1642. - uploaded by Alonso de Mendoza - nominated by --Thi (talk) 11:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Thi (talk) 11:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful painting. Wolverine XI 20:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent reproduction. --Harlock81 (talk) 09:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:26, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Harlock81 --Terragio67 (talk) 16:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:09, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Groups

File:Black-throated green warbler in PP (14050).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2024 at 19:30:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Parulidae (New World Warblers)
Info A male black-throated green warbler (Setophaga virens). The technical quality is IMO sufficient but I know it's not going to dazzle anyone -- these tiny, hyperactive migratory birds are difficult subjects, spending most of their time high up in the canopy. I was pleased to get this shot during a rare trip down to eye-level. One of my favorite of the expected migrants in this part of the world, maybe because they're both challenging and beautiful. :) all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:30, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:30, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice stance. Wolverine XI 20:53, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 21:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking pose --Tagooty (talk) 03:21, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 08:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the pose too but the level of detail is not outstanding, so I stay neutral Poco a poco (talk) 18:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:05, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Parulidae (New World Warblers)

File:Killdeer Heislerville.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2024 at 18:46:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Charadrius
Info created and uploaded by Needsmoreritalin - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent --El Golli Mohamed 13:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice --SHB2000 (talk) 10:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:40, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: great capture, although the choice of the PNG format seems like an overkill. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMHO QI but not impressivwe enough for FP. There is an existing FP shows a better separation of the subject from the background and a tighter presentation (crop) to the bird. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The photo you mention is also very good but it was probably taken in cloudy weather (if we can trust the white balance and the absence of glare at the bird's eye) on the other hand the one that is nominated is photographed in sunny weather with a glare at the bird's eye and a warmer white balance that I find better to my taste. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful eyes. Wolverine XI 21:06, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the Nomination, WildMouse76 and thank you to everyone who supports the nomination. This would be a first for me and I am very excited. --Needsmoreritalin 3:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:24, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 10:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Zzzs (talk) 21:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Charadrius

File:Traquet à tête grise Ksar Guilène001.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2024 at 13:38:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:38, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:38, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not bad. Wolverine XI 20:55, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice --Zzzs (talk) 21:40, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support simple but neat! --SHB2000 (talk) 09:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:25, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per SHB2000 --Terragio67 (talk) 16:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)

File:Patos Muscovy - Capitão1.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2024 at 18:11:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Cairina
Info: Muscovy ducks huddling at Capitão Lake, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but too many birds. Wolverine XI 20:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 09:46, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Wolverine: there's too many birds and it ruins the perseption IMO. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 11:01, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much birds in one place. Can't really tell what's going on. --Zzzs (talk) 17:11, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the crowded birds are cute --imehling (talk) 16:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I feel the same. With 3 birds at the front looking directly into the camera, I think this group composition is harmonious, not chaotic. --The Cosmonaut (talk)

Oppose Unappealing light, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rain Clouds Tsarap Phuktal Zanskar Jun24 R16 07793.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2024 at 03:29:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info Rain clouds over the Tsarap River near Phuktal Gompa, Zanskar, India. River elev. 3,820 m (12,530 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 03:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 03:29, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. Yann (talk) 09:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 09:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Красный ^{wanna talk?} 10:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:35, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:18, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:40, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would kill for this image. --Zzzs (talk) 22:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that you are thinking about decimating the mosquito population. ;) --Cart (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support But a murder goes too far for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#India

File:Vallombrosa formazione di ghiaccio.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 12:43:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Ice>
Info created by Anna.Massini - uploaded by Anna.Massini - nominated by [[User:{{subst:Anna.Massini}}|]] -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 12:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 12:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

InfoThe process of water solidifying into ice drop by drop, forming ring after ring until an ice stalactite is formed

Comment very tilted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. It is now perpendicular. Can you support it?(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't oppose or support now except in exceptional circumstances. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo --نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great icicle, but I think if the depth of field is going to include the background, it needs to be a more interesting overall scene. If the goal is just the icicle, that seems difficult with one so close to the wall. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 11:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination i withdraw(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 14:13, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 14:13, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rio Doce em Resplendor.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 11:24:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info Doce River in Resplendor, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 11:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Missing wow. Left part rather dark. Not overwhelming in detail quality.--Milseburg (talk) 16:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 16:51, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunrise at Ethiopia´s salt flats.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2024 at 18:56:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ethiopia
Info created & uploaded by Thomas Fuhrmann – nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:56, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Slight CA, dof issues and tilt but overall FP to me Poco a poco (talk) 20:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The CA should be fixed. Otherwise good.--Ermell (talk) 10:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 15:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Poco a Poco & Ermell. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:56, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ethiopia

Smerinthus ocellatus, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2024 at 18:42:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Female
Male

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Sphingidae_(Hawk_Moths)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 18:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:42, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail but I think you should crop the picture of the male, because in this set it seems smaller than the female, in proportion. I checked the description and you say they are both of the same dimension ("Wingspan 70–95 mm")-- Basile Morin (talk) 08:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basile Morin & others: this male was a bit smaller than female, but I can't say how much. Wingspan can be from 70 to 95 mm. -- Ivar (talk) 19:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The male should be shown larger for a set nomination. The size difference would not be this great. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 10:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others --Llez (talk) 12:12, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! --Terragio67 (talk) 16:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 10:53, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)

File:Vista panorâmica de Vitória.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2024 at 18:29:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Brazil
Info Panoramic view of the Vitória bay as seen from the Penha Convent, Espirito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 18:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 18:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good view, but unfortunately the horizon is significantly curved, and one of the buildings on the left edge seems to be leaning out a little bit. dllu (talk) 01:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How is the tilted horizon possible if the bridge is not? ★ 02:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the composition. But the image quality is so bad (over-processed over-sharpened mobile phone image) this can not be described as an outstanding image. --August Geyler (talk) 07:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination OK. ★ 11:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ArionStar: : it looks like this panorama was auto-generated by your phone, in which case the loss of quality and geometrical distortions are almost inevitable. However, your phone is capable of producing 48 MP RAW images. A panorama stitched from a sequence of such images should be quite spectacular. I use Hugin, for which RAW needs to be converted to JPEG, but other panorama stitchers can work with RAW directly. The location is definitely FP-worthy. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's a long way for me to create featured panoramas. ★ 17:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Hugin is not difficult to use and it's free! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torre Cesta - San Marino - GT 01 - 2024 04 30.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2024 at 12:06:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#San Marino
Info The Cesta tower is one of three towered peaks overlooking the city of San Marino, the capital of San Marino. This composition was created with Hugin, stitching 16 photographs with three different exposures, in order to have the darkest parts visible. The photo was deliberately taken on a late spring afternoon in its best moment of lighting. Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 12:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 12:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the lower part has been cropped to give centrality to the subject. Terragio67 (talk) 12:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the contrast between the sunlit castle and the partially shaded unapproachable rock.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Already promoted, File:Paraglide and Cesta tower - San Marino - GT 06 - 2024 04 30.jpg was better. We have also:

Thank you for your attention to the photos I took, but in reality one of these was taken by Max_Ryazanov in 2013, perhaps I could have requested a simultaneous FP delist because its lower resolution, but in the end I didn't.

The Guaita fortress is another tower of different height, which is 300 meters away with 100 meters of altitude difference from the Cesta fortress. I decided to add one last image of the Cesta tower, because I completely changed the angle. Even more importantly, I used an aperture of f/180 mm, in fact the metallic feather on the highest point of the tower is more defined than the other two apertures identified in the photos, respectively at f/100 (the first one - paraglider) and f/55 mm (the last one). Terragio67 (talk) 04:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, there are two similar towers in San Marino. But even 3 FPs of the same building are already a lot. This one is really too similar to the already promoted one with a paraglide. Same light, same angle, same day, same time, same weather. You may confuse the aperture F/x and the focal length x mm, since f/180 mm doesn't mean anything. And since the exif are not visible, I can't figure out what you mean. Well, there are a little bit more pixels in this version, but selecting the best candidate is part of the nomination process -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is true, these are two photos taken on the same day, but the intentions were different. In the first one I wished to show the elevation of the building with its view ( ISO 400 - F/5,6 at 1/1000 s), in the second one the details of the upper part of the tower with the fortress leaning on the peak of Mount Titan (ISO 100 - F/8 and F/7.1 - 1/160 s). Terragio67 (talk) 06:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The rock is in the shadow. The two pictures are not so fundamentally different, nor breathtaking to the point that both should be featured, in my opinion. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Famberhorst and Basile Morinː

File:Paraglide and Cesta tower - San Marino - GT 06 - 2024 04 30.jpg actually seems to be a solid Featured Picture, while this one, due to the high definition and the squared crop, I think could be a better candidate as a valued image. Thank you all,

I withdraw my nomination. Terragio67 (talk) 11:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Groupe de barques de pécheur - djerba - tunisie.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2024 at 08:00:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 08:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 08:00, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tight crop, bottom left -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice but tight crop, and the shallow DoF don't work very well here. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 17:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camarón (Dasycaris zanzibarica), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-21, DD 73.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2024 at 08:56:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Palaemonidae (Palaemonids)
Info Shrimp (Dasycaris zanzibarica), Anilao, Philippines. The total length of this shrimp is about 2 centimetres (0.79 in) and does usually habit on whip corals (like in this case, Cirrhipathes spiralis). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 13:28, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support On point! Wolverine XI 21:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Remarkable camouflage and detail for such a small underwater image --Tagooty (talk) 03:48, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:27, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:21, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:15, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Imho a different angle of view could have been more effective in portraying the shrimp (example), but the picture has anyhow a great quality. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 17:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family : Palaemonidae (Palaemonids)

File:Escalator, Public Hotel New York (2024)-L1005609.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2024 at 20:34:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Others
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:39, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yeah, yeah, I usually don't vote, but I'm in a very good mood tonight and then something fantastic comes along. I would sell my soul for that camera. ;) --Cart (talk) 21:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:55, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I usually don't vote on images like this, but this nomination is an exception. --Zzzs (talk) 22:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I usually don't vote but I usually tell lies :-) More seriously, you're lucky it was stopped, so that long exposure was possible -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty good although not perfectly centered, as though the camera was slightly positioned to the right and then panned left. dllu (talk) 00:51, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do~~n't~~ usually vote and even then, this is exceptional. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clearly Poco a poco (talk) 16:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. --August Geyler (talk) 20:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 11:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 04:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Others

File:Great Hall, Washington Union Station (2024)-L1005585.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2024 at 16:16:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice crop, seems to be there. --Terragio67 (talk) 16:36, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well captured! Thanks to the passengers as reference objects, you get a great impression of the station. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support dllu (talk) 20:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support What I said above. --Cart (talk) 21:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support everything is said in the file name :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:43, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 04:43, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations

File:Σαγράδα Φαμίλια 2941.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 16:57:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Spain
Info created, edited and uploaded by C messier - nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 16:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't think it is right to remove the cranes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@C messier: can you give us the original/unedited version? ★ 22:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cranes should be there. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination The cranes are problematic here. ★ 01:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cavapoo dog chasing a maltipoo with a ball (11881).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2024 at 21:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info A little dog running with the ball it just stole from the floppy-eared larger dog, in pursuit. Just a cute dog action shot. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:53, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:53, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not very large, but well frozen and consistent focus / DoF -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:31, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Voyager leads by example :) -- Radomianin (talk) 06:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Words can't explain how much I want to pet these dogs --Zzzs (talk) 05:49, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question It really doesn't matter but looking at the grass, is the image tilted? Easily done is a spontaneous action shot. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- If you're looking at the sloping background, there is indeed a gradual slope there. I don't think it's tilted (and you can sort of make out some vertical people (or perhaps they were trees -- I don't recall) in the dark at the top, but it's possible slightly -- certainly not as much as that slope would indicate, though. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:22, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)

File:Seattle I5 skyline dllu.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2024 at 23:41:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States#Seattle
Info created by User:dllu - uploaded by User:dllu - nominated by User:dllu -- dllu (talk) 23:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info similar to existing FP File:SeattleI5Skyline.jpg but mine is taken more than a decade later (in 2018), with higher resolution and more dynamic range.
Support -- dllu (talk) 23:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:03, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Why f/4 on tripod doing panorama seeking big Time !? Opening is for portrait, also made refraction on right lines which are seen clearly, interesting how big they are and their location. Closed Aperture would be better. --Mile (talk) 08:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are talking about the strange patterns of the light trails, they are not made by the camera settings. These days they occur in most long exposure photos of car lights since they now have LED lamps. You can see the patterns in this photo too. LEDs are not constant, but fast pulsating light sources that create these dotted or fluctuating lines when they move through a long exposure shot. Light from LED clusters (big lamps) can also interfere with each other's wavelengths and create weird shadows. With LEDs becoming more used, night photography will look different from now on. --Cart (talk) 10:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The lens is slightly sharper centrally at f/4 than at f/5.6 according to all reviews of the Voigtlander Apo Lanthar 65mm f/2, such as Lenstip. What's the goal of stopping down? To get more pronounced sunstars, to use a longer exposure time or higher ISO? Here, everything is far enough away that depth of field does not matter. I don't understand what "refraction on right lines" means.

Anyway, in addition to what Cart mentioned about the LED lights, I must also point out that the Dr Jose P. Rizal bridge I was standing on is prone to vibration. You can see the effect of vibration manifesting as sinoisudal light trails in File:SeattleI5Skyline.jpg as well. Of course, this vibration also degrades sharpness throughout the image, making the discussion of sharpness even less relevant. I took a total of 85 photos from this spot and picked this one for a combination of good blue hour lighting and having one of the least vibration. dllu (talk) 16:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Talking about those lines which i annoted. Cars, LED, vibrance dont bother me. But those lines in sky. --Mile (talk) 17:50, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah thanks for the annotations. I think those come from reflections in the filters (polarizer etc) that I was using and aren't related to the f-stop. Let me see if I can clone them out. dllu (talk) 18:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, I've uploaded a new version with some small spurious reflections digitally removed. dllu (talk) 18:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Well, like nobody saw them. I was strange but now i get it, more filters doesnt help always, so pic isnt so sharp as it could be. --Mile (talk) 08:48, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although the noise level is higher than I would like Poco a poco (talk) 20:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 08:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States#Seattle

File:Самарканд. Площадь-Регистан.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 19:28:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Uzbekistan
Info created and uploaded by Vladimir Goncharenko - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perspective correction is needed. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Normally I would agree with this take but Registan buildings are rather skew — there's no way one could make a "straigt and squared" photo of it. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 07:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should know that expectations here for perspective are not tethered to reality. :) By that I mean there are a lot of buildings where it would be impossible to take a fully squared photo, but the expectation in most cases is it's "corrected" in post-processing nonetheless (for better or worse). If you have Lightroom, the guided perspective adjustment can usually address it. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All 4 minarets on this photo are not straight neither fully vertical IRL. I know that local regulars want everything be squared, but that is not the case with some objects and not all the photos should be corrected IMO. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 15:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Although the minarets aren't perfectly straight or vertical, I still think that some perspective correction like in File:Registan square Samarkand.jpg would be beneficial. Anyway, the blue hour lighting is awesome and I wish I could go visit some day. dllu (talk) 18:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This was shot in 2011, current version of coloured artificial lights completely ruins it IMO. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 00:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perspective distortion. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:25, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I think that in this one we can see all the bird (including the foot) with a point of view that highlights the bird much more. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might be commenting on the wrong nomination? -- Zzzs (talk) 01:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly. And in that nom too -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Original architecture seems to be leaning in, while it's not. Perspective correction needed -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Красный ^{wanna talk?} 06:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel Alpenrose - Hohenschwangau.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2024 at 08:17:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Bavaria
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:17, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:17, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Really a nice shot. Can you remove or lighten the purple CA's on the right part (building), please? -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:57, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Done and also some on the left side. Many thanks for the hint --Llez (talk) 15:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Support, very good. Terragio67 (talk) 16:59, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good light. ★ 23:54, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 17:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd reduce though the highlights a bit Poco a poco (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 17:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Bavaria

File:Mitterbach Gemeindealpe Panorama West 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2024 at 07:16:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Lower Austria
Info Panoramic view westwards from Gemeindealpe, Mitterbach am Erlaufsee, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressing details and file size.--Ermell (talk) 21:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Impressive? ★ 23:59, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 19:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 17:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria#Lower Austria

File:Gusano plano (Acanthozoon alderi), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-24, DD 218.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2024 at 16:15:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Phylum : Platyhelminthes
Info Flatworm (Acanthozoon alderi), Anilao, Philippines. Flatforms are relatively simple bilaterian, unsegmented, soft-bodied invertebrates. Being acoelomates (having no body cavity), and having no specialised circulatory and respiratory organs, they are restricted to having flattened shapes that allow oxygen and nutrients to pass through their bodies by diffusion. The digestive cavity has only one opening for both ingestion (intake of nutrients) and egestion (removal of undigested wastes); as a result, the food can not be processed continuously. Note: we have yet no FPs of the whole order Polycladida. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 16:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral See notes. ★ 22:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fish is special but low level of detail for this picture, poor focus, sorry. Your underwater pictures are usually more interesting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination A pity, flatworms are rare, thank you anyhow Poco a poco (talk) 18:57, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 18:57, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carnival Valletta Malta.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2024 at 16:53:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by and uploaded by Fodipali - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 16:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 16:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support – the intrusive hat on the right isn't great, but the rest of the image negates that. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eye-catching costumes. ★ 13:27, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:20, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but the background and the right crop. Wolverine XI 20:59, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:27, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Resolution, only 2,100 × 1,400 pixels., and the right crop, slightly distracting. Exif copyright unclear -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice composition and I want to forgive the unfavorable crop, but 731 Kb with 2,94 Mpix is too small for FP IMO, sorry. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 04:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose With Красный. --August Geyler (talk) 20:26, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree, a shame Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Already being nominated for deletion. I also agree with all opposing candidates. What a bummer. --Zzzs (talk) 22:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 01:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gewoon biggenkruid - Hypochaeris radicata, 04-06-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 04:24:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Cichorioideae
Info Half-opened flower bud of (Hypochaeris radicata) Focus stack of 29 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 10:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:52, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chepry (talk) 08:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Cichorioideae

File:Pedra da Mua e Praia dos Lagosteiros2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2024 at 22:43:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: Pedra da Mua Natural Monument and Lagosteiros beach seen from Lagosteiros Natural Monument at golden hour; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 10:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:10, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you please fix the greenish tint? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if I can see it. Is it across the image or at a specific area? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The sea appears greenish (or yellowish, since its color is green), and overall the whole image. That was what refrained me from supporting at the beginning, and apparently Frank's view confirms my impression -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It would be great to bring a bit more space at the top, as part of the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Many details are present in full resolution. Really well done! --Harlock81 (talk) 12:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 06:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Portugal

File:Il soffitto del Duomo di Pisa nel 2019.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 16:48:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Italy
Info created and uploaded by EgidioDB - nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 16:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'd expect more sharpness, sorry, Arion Poco a poco (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ISO 6400 generates a lack of quality. A tripod would have helped -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 06:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sagrada Familia (July 2022) 14.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 01:33:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Spain
Info created and uploaded by Maksimsokolov - nominated by ★ -- ★ 01:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Worms' eye-view with fewer cranes. -- ★ 01:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Scaffolding ruins the impression of symmetry. Distracting crane -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let me introduce the Sagrada Família: it is the largest unfinished Catholic church in the world, under construction since 1882. So cranes and scaffolding are part of the composition and routine. I don't think the author would wait until 2030 to take the photo. ★ 10:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And we're not bond to love these distracting elements. Just compare for example -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose - I don't mind the scaffolding so much, but it looks like some horizontal rotation, and I'd like to see more of the bottom in the frame. Maybe calls for a wider-angle lens or backing up just a bit more? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination ★ 16:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Echasse blanche Thyna018.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2024 at 13:13:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes #Family : Recurvirostridae (Avocets and Stilts)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 13:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunate bottom crop Poco a poco (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
vegetation below the reflection of the bird's head El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:55, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a wider composition, but now we can see the vegetation. I couldn't have a higher point of view because I would miss the interesting golden bokeh behind the bird so it was the best compromise El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't doubt that you could have made it better, I wasn't there you judge and the camera settings look fine, but I would expect something like this image with reflection of the same species. If I compare both images, this isn't clearly the better one. Poco a poco (talk) 10:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Awkward composition with the cut out reflection, and relatively small resolution, given the huge background -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
with two "opposed" votes my photo must be awful. Thanks El Golli Mohamed (talk) 11:02, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only the reflection is awkward -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I am reassured now. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 12:02, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course :-) Also I would have preferred the bird looking in front, or behind, for a more appealing silhouette. Still it's just my (single) opinion, (un)fortunately I can't vote twice :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support - It caught my eye, with good color and smooth bokeh. You may be able to get rid of the green at the bottom (and tag the image with Template:Retouched). Personally I prefer to see more space at the top for reflection images of non-architectural subjects, but that's just me. Regardless, I'd be happy to get such a photo. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I tried to retouch the bottom but it touches the bird's head and it will remain visible. It's unfortunate but sometimes we have constraints like that where we have to deal with it. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:African Chaffinch (Fringilla spodiogenys) female Sfax.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 18:03:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 18:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zzzs (talk) 18:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chepry (talk) 08:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)

File:Cape starling (Lamprotornis nitens) Kruger.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 16:55:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
Info One existing FP, also from the Kruger Park. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:38, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful plumage -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)

File:Chevêche d'Athéna (Athene noctua).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 09:01:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
Info created by Houssembo - uploaded by Houssembo - nominated by نعيم قربوسي -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:36, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:10, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:34, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chepry (talk) 08:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice but I'd crop a bit on the left and looks overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 20:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Poco a poco --Zzzs (talk) 22:57, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Strigidae (True Owls)

Domplatz 11 in Sankt Pölten, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2024 at 12:09:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Main facade seen from the right side
Main facade seen straight on
Main facade seen from the left side
Gable
Windows

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 12:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good job --El Golli Mohamed 15:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done! Your hard work has not gone unnoticed. Wolverine XI 17:47, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Krzysztof, but neither this is a valid set, nor all these images are FP in my opinion. I'd support though the first one as FP. Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Only #1 and #2 are FP level in my opinion, and I agree with Poco this set falls short with the guidelines (see "Not acceptable: the facade of a church plus an organ"). Personal taste: I find the Sparkasse Bank logo out of step with the architectural style and unfortunately the juxtaposition quite inharmonious. No wow for the last one, sorry, in a set all the candidates should be extraordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tournasol7: The second one is clearly a FP. ★ 03:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Панорама Плато Майдантал.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2024 at 07:12:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Uzbekistan
Info created and uploaded by Arina Pan - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 07:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 07:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 09:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 13:48, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:36, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 21:09, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Overprocessed and why F/2,8 at 1/8000 s ? It's a static scenery. F/13 would have given the flowers of the foreground in focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support $e^{100}$ / $100$ ! --SHB2000 (talk) 09:39, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Camera setting not optimal but still impressive.--Ermell (talk) 10:22, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin. --imehling (talk) 16:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love this landscape.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose With Basile Morin. --August Geyler (talk) 20:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Basile Morin --Zzzs (talk) 05:46, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Uzbekistan

File:Antonio's Antiques during Orange Skies Day dllu.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 17:24:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Natural_phenomena#Others
Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by dllu -- dllu (talk) 17:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Orange Skies Day was a rare climatological event where the sky became dark orange due to extreme wildfire smoke. This photo was taken at 10:39 am in the morning. dllu (talk) 17:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- dllu (talk) 17:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! ★ 18:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Apocalyptic impression. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ten days later, the smoke reached Sweden and we got the orange glow. Scary... --Cart (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scary indeed. Your photo is also impressive. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Whew! Thought it was the end of the world! --Zzzs (talk) 04:39, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin --Terragio67 (talk) 13:23, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support outstanding! Chepry (talk) 08:25, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice but apart from the billboard it's too dark Poco a poco (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Others

File:Errimel Bizerte.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 08:49:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Shipwrecks
Info created and uploaded by Smailtn, nominated by نعيم قربوسي -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 08:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 08:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Smailtn (talk) 09:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very good composition. --August Geyler (talk) 10:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Though maybe a touch oversaturated? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
contrast level corrected image Smailtn (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, contrast level corrected image Smailtn (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot, though a little noisy. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you, noise level corrected image Smailtn (talk) 15:11, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This image of a ship graveyard at Rimel Beach, south of Bizerte, Tunisia seems a little dark - suggest lightening. The blue and red freighter on the left is the general cargo ship, Hamada S - IMO 7946643; MMSI 271002029 (formerly named Hakan Kalkavan). This should be entered in the image description and categorized as such. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you, image corrected to clair Smailtn (talk) 22:40, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 16:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tilted in ccw direction, otherwise very nice Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you Smailtn (talk) 22:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean with that? Please, fix the tilt, otherwise I'll oppose. I don't see why an image with an obvious problem that can be easily fixed shoul be promoted to FP. Poco a poco (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As announced I ~~Oppose~~ until the tilt is fixed Poco a poco (talk) 20:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to Neutral as the tilt is fixed but the image looks overprocessed to me with low level of detail Poco a poco (talk) 21:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very important tilt, yes. I don't understand why Poco's remark is ignored. It should be corrected. Sea level clearly not horizontal -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for fixing the tilt Smailtn (talk) 22:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, the tilt are corrected Smailtn (talk) 22:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Ping me when tilt corrected. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, the tilt are corrected Smailtn (talk) 22:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ The tilt should not be ignored. --Zzzs (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2024‎ (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I didn't notice it. Per others. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Shipwrecks

File:OrteliusWorldMap.jpeg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2024 at 17:02:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
Info created by Abraham Ortelius - uploaded by ¡0-8-15! - nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 17:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the yellow tint of the background could be improved, if not totally removed. Yann (talk) 18:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to a version with the foxing/yellowing removed from the map. The background is a cream-colored tint instead. It's yours if anyone wants it: link. --Cart (talk) 23:17, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ArionStar, Llez, Agnes Monkelbaan, and MZaplotnik: I uploaded the version edited by Cart. Much better IMO. Yann (talk) 08:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Cart! ★ 23:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 08:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:13, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 04:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world

File:STS-135 Atlantis' final tow back.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 21:28:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space launch vehicles
Info created by NASA/Kim Shiflett - uploaded by Ras67 - nominated by Zzzs -- Zzzs (talk) 21:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zzzs (talk) 21:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:34, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Iconic picture --Ras67 (talk) 04:34, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Красный ^{wanna talk?} 18:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:20, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 06:23, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Space exploration#Space launch vehicles

File:Wood duck female (73468).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 21:18:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Aix
Info Female wood duck (Aix sponsa). The male wood ducks get all the attention, but the females are pretty, too! Nominated this a while back and withdrew after the first voter pointed out issues I didn't have time to address. Improved now and renominating. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:18, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 05:32, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chepry (talk) 08:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:26, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Poco a poco --Zzzs (talk) 22:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 06:24, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus%20:%20Aix

File:20231125 housecat south meadows PD100306.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2024 at 09:06:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info created and uploaded by Paul Danese, nominated by Yann
Support Perfect composition. The cat seems to be hunting, and using camouflage. Nice light, very sharp. -- Yann (talk) 09:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:10, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 16:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Sharp subject but shadows too dominant in this image. Only one eye is in the light. And I don't think this cat uses "camouflage" technique, it rather seems hard to distinguish with poor contrast and same background color -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 20:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose It's a great photo but the background is so noisy.. Henrysz (talk) 19:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pdanese (talk) 00:48, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)

File:Buffle d'eau - tunisie.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2024 at 08:03:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 08:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 08:03, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:38, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 09:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice compo and subject, but the light is a bit harsh, and details are not very crisp. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 08:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 20:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Christian Ferrer -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:04, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)

File:Nebria aenea.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 08:36:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Carabidae (Ground Beetles)
Info created and uploaded by Avustfel - nominated by Красный -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 08:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Harsh flash light, low resolution with huge background (only 2,917 × 2,188 pixels), animal too small -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:53, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Красный ^{wanna talk?} 17:27, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zaadcapsule van een Cyclamen Hederifolium. 18-06-2024. (d.j.b).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 04:16:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family : Primulaceae
Info Ripening seed capsule on the spiral of a Cyclamen Hederifolium. Focus stack of 27 photos. The spiral distributes the seeds around the plant.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chepry (talk) 08:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I wondered about the role of the spiral. I found this online which explains it well: "As each flower fades, the flowering stem retracts the old flower though a clever spiral coiling mechanism. The coil pulls the developing seed back to the ground-level corm, where it holds on tight until the seed is ripe. The ripe seeds are then cleverly coated with a sugary substance known as elaiosome, which is enticing to ants and wasps, who then unknowingly assist with seed dispersal." Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your clear explanation. Nature has a solution for everything (except for the environmental problems caused by humans themselves)--Famberhorst (talk) 15:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Terragio67 (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding "human", I prefer ~~would have preferred~~ a natural background rather than an industrial one -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC) update -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: If you mean the background of the photo, that's just grass from the lawn in the garden.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure it's not "a kind of decor" like here? -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sure! The photo was taken last week on June 18, 2024 06:47. Since all that criticism (including from you) we have stopped photographing the plants and flowers against an artificial background. We haven't done that for a while. So your comment is an annoying unjustified assumption.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Okay, if the background is natural -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The spike makes this remind me of something that killed me in a video game. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:21, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support True, per Rhododendrites --Terragio67 (talk) 18:00, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The spike looks more like the needle that always makes people pass out during shots/blood draws --Zzzs (talk) 19:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 22:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Remarkable detail of an unusual plant --Tagooty (talk) 06:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 18:36, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants #Family : Primulaceae

File:Spain Andalusia Seville BW 2015-10-23 15-40-35.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2024 at 11:37:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 11:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Berthold Werner (talk) 11:37, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 14:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good for QI but lacks of enough wow for FP. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:28, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support special mention for the composition, a pity there is not a bit more sun light. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice architectural elements, but the bridge is crushed between the foreground and the background, making the composition cluttered, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:59, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 10:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Moheen. -- Karelj (talk) 15:04, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chevêche d'Athéna - Menzel Bouzaien - tunisie.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 20:58:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family:Strigidae (Athene noctua)
Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Surely not as good as current FPC of same species? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Bottom-up view with focus on the feet, not on the head -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Skander zarrad (talk) 15:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cangrejo porcelana (Neopetrolisthes maculatus) en una anémona alfombra de Mertens (Stichodactyla mertensii), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-22, DD 223.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2024 at 19:27:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Order : Decapoda (Crabs, Shrimps and Relatives)
Info Aprox 4 centimetres (1.6 in)-long porcelain crab (Neopetrolisthes maculatus) on a Mertens' carpet sea anemone (Stichodactyla mertensii), Anilao, Philippines. Note: we have no FPs of the whole family Porcellanidae (porcelain crabs). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 21:53, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Should be comfortable carpet :-) Nice angle -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not a bad choice for carpet textures --Zzzs (talk) 05:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual composition, excellent quality --Tagooty (talk) 06:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good one now… ★ 18:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:15, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Order : Decapoda (Crabs, Shrimps and Relatives)

File:Pato Muscovy - Capitão.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2024 at 04:07:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Cairina
Info: feral Muscovy duck drake at Capitão Lake, Azores. -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:07, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 04:14, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 10:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good for QI but enough wow in this wild Muscovy image for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:17, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per GRDN711. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree, it lacks wow Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --imehling (talk) 19:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good but not outstanding. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 05:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe lacks wow, but somehow beautiful and attracts attention. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 17:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Ermell. Common bird and ordinary top-down view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:05, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per GRDN711. -- Karelj (talk) 09:54, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martial eagle (Polemaetus bellicosus).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2024 at 21:04:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Polemaetus (Martial Eagle)
Info The endangered martial eagle, Africa's largest eagle. One FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support even though it is a small file.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:11, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:View across Slok reservoir to Belchatow power plant 4.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 06:08:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Poland
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Plozessor (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:55, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting subject but a bit too "static"" IMO, likely because of the row of trees. Also, it lacks of dramatic atmosphere. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:31, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Quality image but limited wow factor in my view. The lower part with the half cut reflection is not very successful, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd say the water vapor casting shadows is very impressive looking Henrysz (talk) 19:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ingredienti per il pesto Genovese (Ingridients for Pesto Genovese).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 10:53:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food : Processing, preparing and cooking
Info Finalist in Pesto Genovese contest - Pesto Genovese ingrideints. My work. --Mile (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The whites are slightly overexposed, but it's a nice well executed photo El Golli Mohamed 11:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good composition, educational and pleasing for the eye and reminding my tastebuds of pleasant things --Kritzolina (talk) 16:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done. --Zzzs (talk) 17:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The focus stacking issues around the green leaves and above the pot are a bit distracting at full size -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin True and corrected. --Mile (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Well done -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Felino Volador (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe one of your best food pictures, Mile. Thanks for sharing! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Frank Schulenburg Thanx, i do put more on food, so need to be good. We are low on "food photo". But i could not pass wining photo. Didnt have much time, flight next day. --Mile (talk) 09:46, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is that a joke by the jury? What's this winning picture all blurry, out of focus, poor light and distracting corner?! -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was wondering if they judge from smartphone. It is strange, yes. But some serious criteria "foreign jury" as first. --Mile (talk) 07:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Overall, well done. Listing the represented ingredients is a definite plus. If I were trying to imrprove this arrangement, a little higher camera perspective and gathering the ingredients more tightly together would let you move in tighter and strengthen the impact. --GRDN711 (talk) 12:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:55, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 18:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Food : Processing, preparing and cooking

File:Visitors at the 2024 Easter fire in Rottorf, 2024 03 30.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 13:11:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fire
Info created and uploaded by Friedrich Haag, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 13:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Felino Volador (talk) 02:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. Disclaimer: I so desperately miss this German custom. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 09:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:59, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 00:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo is fire! 🔥 ★ 18:38, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 05:36, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:10, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Fire

File:Trumpeter finch (Bucanetes githagineus zedlitzi) female Kebili 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 17:00:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:15, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice but level of detail is not the best Poco a poco (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry the head is overprocessed. You may have tried adding sharpness but it gives a weird result.El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)

File:Fauvette pitchou Ichkeul064.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2024 at 16:15:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support good for 500 mm. --Mile (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:00, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:57, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 16:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:12, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 18:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)

File:Kiwi da Itália.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 12:04:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info Kiwifruits from Italy in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 12:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Everyone is fed up with my fruit images. ★ 14:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What do you think about adding a rule so that once someone cancels a nomination they have to wait a while to be able to nominate another image? Wilfredor (talk) 16:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfredor, rules like that are only added when there is a general problem with many users misusing the site in some way. In this case, ArionStar is the only one with this pattern of quick withdrawals and adding new noms. We can't make a rule just because one person will not follow the general praxis. In this case a sharp reminder should be enough. If that doesn't work, a temporary block could be recommended to let them cool down and give the community some time off from these rapid-fire nominations. --Cart (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and it makes sense Wilfredor (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roselin githagine.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2024 at 22:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 12:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:16, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:41, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I can't see anything special in the photo, sharpness not good. -- Karelj (talk) 13:28, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You don't see anything special in the photo is your own opinion but what do you mean by sharpness not good? The head of the bird is very sharp and even the breast has an acceptable sharpness. It's an aperture of 5.6 so the body is less sharp than the head. Moreover it's a very sharp prime lens. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sharpness of the head is very good. Perhaps he means depth of field is not good? Might F8 with a higher ISO have worked better? I wonder if the image is tilted; there's no point of reference but the finch looks as if it might fall over! Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't understand why all the bird must be in focus. This is not the style of wildlife photography. The image is not tilted at all, the bird is hopping up this rock in this position. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Citation needed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For which, Frank? The 'authoritative' "This is not the style of wildlife photography", or the reasonable assumption: "The style of many wildlife photographers is to try to get as much as possible in focus". Many just means a large number, such as, say 25,000. You have 25,000,000 wildlife photographers in the USA, so I am guessing, I admit, that 1 in 1000 tries to get as much as possible in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice dynamic pose. --C messier (talk) 17:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 11:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Fringillidae (Finches and Allies)

File:Percival Lowell by James E. Purdy.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 00:59:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by James E. Purdy - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination for now: lost track of number of nominations. Whoops. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Φάρος Μελαγκάβι 7382.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2024 at 10:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Greece
Info created & ploaded by C messier - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Attractive, balanced composition in good light. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 19:10, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Πολύ όμορφο, φέρνει αναμνήσεις El Golli Mohamed 22:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Time could be diferent. --Mile (talk) 08:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 12:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:49, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely! --Zzzs (talk) 01:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination Tomer T. --C messier (talk) 10:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Greece

File:Orb weaver spider (Argiope flavipalpis) female on web Nyamebe Bepo.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2024 at 19:28:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Araneidae (Orb-weaver Spiders)
Info The web decoration (Stabilimentum) of Argiope spiders changes as the females get older (and bigger). This FP looks like it's a juvenile Argiope flavipalpis. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overexposed, some part have burned out. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Christian, Poco a poco (talk) 09:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I second Christian, sorry Charles. --Zzzs (talk) 12:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK I withdraw my nomination Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]