Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 07 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination “Kreislauf des Geldes” fountain (Karl-Henning Seemann, 1976) in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cantilever sign at the Ratskeller in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ascent to the steeple of the St. Viktor Church, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former sanctuary lamp in a storage room in the tower of the St. Viktor Church, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint Rupert, Völkermarkt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque at the parish church Saint Rupert, Völkermarkt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint Rupert, Völkermarkt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grave of family Jaritz on the cemetery Sankt Ruprecht, Völkermarkt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel “Crucifixion” at the cemetery Saint Ruprecht, Völkermarkt, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winter sea in Porto Covo, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 01:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winter sea in Porto Covo, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 01:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 777 Bay Street, Toronto, Canada --Maksimsokolov 23:39, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very good, just a touch of noise at full size, no issue. -- Ikan Kekek 01:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manukau Harbour at low tide --Prosperosity 23:37, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose I'm sorry to say this photo is of rather low picture quality. It's very noisy and also not sharp enough at full size. Nice capture, but you would need better equipment for QI, most likely. -- Ikan Kekek 01:28, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kleinostheim, railway station, street side --KaiBorgeest 22:37, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Staircase in former locomotive repair shop in Trier. --Palauenc05 22:37, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Destroyed and overgrown window of former locomotive repair shop in Trier. --Palauenc05 22:37, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination LEVC VN5 at Classic-Gala Schwetzingen 2021.--Alexander-93 18:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:36, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Replica of Benz Patent-Motorwagen Model 1 at Classic-Gala Schwetzingen 2021.--Alexander-93 18:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:36, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rolls-Royce 20hp from 1923 at Classic-Gala Schwetzingen 2021.--Alexander-93 18:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rolls-Royce 20hp at Classic-Gala Schwetzingen 2021.--Alexander-93 18:01, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Santa Maria degli Angeli a Pizzofalcone (Naples) - Interior --Commonists 15:19, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arkhangelsk. Icebreaker «Dikson» --Alexxx1979 14:23, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Divje Babe flute (Late Pleistocene flute) --PetarM 12:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Acer negundo. Fruit. --Knopik-som 11:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 12:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crataegus. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 11:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:47, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crataegus. Leaf abaxial side. --Knopik-som 11:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:47, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reynoutria japonica. Leaf adaxial side. --Knopik-som 11:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Radomianin 11:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Reynoutria japonica. Leaf abaxial side. --Knopik-som 11:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Radomianin 11:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Furnas do Enxofre, Angra do Heroísmo, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 11:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:15, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Furnas do Enxofre, Angra do Heroísmo, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 11:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 15:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Furnas do Enxofre, Angra do Heroísmo, Terceira Island, Azores, Portuga --Poco a poco 11:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maria Hilf Catholic Parish Church in Bamberg, aerial view. --Ermell 10:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Bamberg --Ermell 10:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Bamberg. View of the train station --Ermell 10:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Bamberg --Ermell 10:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Holy Life-Giving Trinity in Orekhovo-Borisovo, Moscow. --Andrey Korzun 08:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --PetarM 12:43, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Holy Life-Giving Trinity in Orekhovo-Borisovo, Moscow. --Andrey Korzun 08:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Transfiguration of the Lord in Bogorodskoye, Moscow. Window with carved platbands and cornice. --Andrey Korzun 08:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of the Transfiguration of the Lord in Bogorodskoye, Moscow. A door lined with copper details, porch details.. --Andrey Korzun 08:24, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Workers houses, Chemin de Halage 9 to 19, Wambrechies, France --Velvet 08:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the Saint Martin church in Colmar, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 06:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:23, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the Saint Martin church in Colmar, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 06:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose The top of the image is overexposed and lost focus. Could you retake this a different time of the day? --Prburley 15:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Protestant church in Kirchberg an der Jagst, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:47, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Stadtturm in Kirchberg an der Jagst, Baden-W., Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in Oßling, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Nicholas church in Pulsnitz, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:47, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gravestones at the Saint Mary church in Kamenz, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:33, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination De Kruidhof Buitenpost. Fountain in Mediterranean Garden.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination De Kruidhof Buitenpost. Fountain in Mediterranean Garden.
-
- Nomination De Kruidhof Buitenpost. Fountain in Mediterranean Garden.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination De Kruidhof Buitenpost. Fountain in Mediterranean Garden.
-
- Nomination Donation portal at the Cathedral in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cathedral in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Michael Popp, footballplayer of SV Stripfing. --Steindy 00:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thomas Weber, footballplayer of SV Stripfing. --Steindy 00:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thomas Weber, footballplayer of SV Stripfing. --Steindy 00:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 15:20, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Head bust of Father Francisco Ferandez, founder of the Saint Joseph Catholic Church in Ouidah, Benin --Adoscam 11:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, in my opinion, but you should add Category:Busts in Benin and Category:Busts in Benin at a minimum. -- Ikan Kekek 20:31, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: I think you meant a different additional category --Trougnouf 21:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Comment additional category added. thanks.--Adoscam 08:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Support, thanks. I don't know what additional category I may have meant, but I'm happy now. -- Ikan Kekek 08:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great blue heron in Green-Wood Cemetery --Rhododendrites 23:07, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Smart Forease+ at Geneva International Motor Show 2019, Le Grand-Saconnex --MB-one 21:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Classic-Gala Schwetzingen 2021.--Alexander-93 15:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment The main facade is in shadow. In my eyes this is not a QI --Augustgeyler 16:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Perhaps this would be a problem on FPC, but on QIC quality is good enough. There is not always sun on the facade. The gala-situation is kept well. --Milseburg 16:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Close wing position of Catapaecilma major (Druce,1895) – Common Tinsel (Male). (by Atanu Bose Photography) --Atudu 12:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, but the head is out of focus. --Tiouraren 16:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La commune de Vouvry vue depuis Corbeyrier. --Espandero 12:23, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion The dark parts nedd more light. --Milseburg 17:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback. I reworked the image from scratch and I belive it is now lighter and less blue. - Espandero 18:53, 31 October 2021 (UTC) I would lighten the dark areas a lot more and reduce some blue after that. The noise in the sky can also be reduced. --Milseburg 15:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, I uploaded a new version. Let me know if it's okay now. - Espandero 20:18, 2 November 2021 (UTC) QI now, I think. --Milseburg 15:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Cirrus spissatus and Cirrocumulus stratiformis over the sky of Jakarta --Vitaium 00:08, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Feces of tubular sea cucumber (Holothuria tubulosa), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Feces of tubular sea cucumber (Holothuria tubulosa), Arrábida Natural Park, Portugal --Poco a poco 17:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ohio and Erie Canal, Lock 48 in Rushtown, OH Nheyob 15:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mercedes-Benz 500 K A Cabriolet from 1935 at Classic-Gala Schwetzingen 2021.--Alexander-93 11:15, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Cupra Leon in Stuttgart.--Alexander-93 16:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:48, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blue whistling thrush (Myophonus caeruleus) Posing. --ADARSHluck 16:44, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:56, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Laudenbach (Lower Franconia), tomb chapel of the Freiherrn von Fechenbach --KaiBorgeest 21:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Is there anything you can do about the burnt areas (especially on the chapel itself)? --Domob 13:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
It is bright, shiny metal in the sun--KaiBorgeest 22:27, 3 November 2021 (UTC).
Support I understand that, just wanted to check if e.g. some highlight compression might still be possible from the raw file. It is bothering me a bit (since it is part of the main subject, not only the sky), but IMHO the picture overall is good quality. --Domob 14:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Chandra Taal (Lake) and the surrounding mountains, Lahaul and Spiti Dist., HP, India. Elev. ~4,000 m. --ADARSHluck 12:49, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Clearly tilted, bad crop at bottom and sharpness not convincing, after the first two issues are fixed I'd go for neutral --Poco a poco 17:56, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Done Thank you @Poco a poco: for pointing out the corrections. I have fixed the tilt, crop and was able to slightly improve the sharpness. --ADARSHluck 12:42, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
An improvement but the sharpness is not so good. I wouldn't promote it but leave it open to other reviewers --Poco a poco 17:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 4 rue des Artisans in Colmar, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 15:41, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Can you give it just a little more space on the left? I don't like that the lamp is cut off (even though it is just a tiny bit). Otherwise it is good quality for me. --Domob 16:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, but it was taken that you see... --Tournasol7 18:08, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Support That's fine, just wanted to check. It is good quality for me even with this crop. --Domob 14:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review
[edit]File:Interior_of_Johanneskapelle,_Pfons-Altstadt_09.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Interior of Johanneskapelle, Pfons-Altstadt - statue of Madonna with child, detail --Kritzolina 16:59, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:28, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose For me, the white balance and brightness need to be corrected. --Andrey Korzun 17:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose too dark. --Kallerna 08:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose It's casual ! In addition, it's too dark and the cut is not good at all, even if it's a detail. --Sebring12Hrs 17:37, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 23:56, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Shelburne_Falls_October_2021_003.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Glacial potholes, Shelburne Falls, MA. --King of Hearts 04:53, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment Perspective should be corrected. --Ermell 05:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- The bottom edge is more than 45 degrees below vertical, and correcting it would lead to extremely unnatural distortion. When an image is only slightly off from normal perspective, it makes sense to correct, but here it is better to just have a natural aerial view. We shouldn't try to force perspective when it's halfway between perfectly vertical and perfectly straight down. --King of Hearts 07:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- You should try and then pull the image apart a bit. That´s what I do. --Ermell 08:38, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- It also cuts out parts of the composition that I intend to include in the image. IMO if it requires a greater than +50 correction in Lightroom, then it shouldn't be corrected. --King of Hearts 16:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- I would be interested what others think. --Ermell 22:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- It also cuts out parts of the composition that I intend to include in the image. IMO if it requires a greater than +50 correction in Lightroom, then it shouldn't be corrected. --King of Hearts 16:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- You should try and then pull the image apart a bit. That´s what I do. --Ermell 08:38, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- The bottom edge is more than 45 degrees below vertical, and correcting it would lead to extremely unnatural distortion. When an image is only slightly off from normal perspective, it makes sense to correct, but here it is better to just have a natural aerial view. We shouldn't try to force perspective when it's halfway between perfectly vertical and perfectly straight down. --King of Hearts 07:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Perspective looks quite unusual to me, but a full correction will result in a strange look. Maybe the image overall is a little bit dark. I would apply a slight tilt clockwise and hope it looks more natural. Greetings --Dirtsc 13:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Dirtsc: I have brightened the image. Not sure why the image needs to be rotated; it is impossible for a drone photo to be tilted unless the gimbal is miscalibrated, and you can see that the verticals in the center are straight. --King of Hearts 16:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Support Thanks. I took one more look at the verticals and I have to correct myselt,: I would apply a slight tilt counterclockwise, then the verticals will be correct. But overall good. Greetings --Dirtsc 09:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Dirtsc: I have brightened the image. Not sure why the image needs to be rotated; it is impossible for a drone photo to be tilted unless the gimbal is miscalibrated, and you can see that the verticals in the center are straight. --King of Hearts 16:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support See my comments in the nomination below. Alvesgaspar 18:14, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support I completely agree with King of Hearts: if the angle of an aerial image with respect to the horizon is too large, the verticals should not be corrected because this leads to very unnatural looking distortions. For example, rectangular sides of buildings become very acute-angled parallelograms or trapezoids, which looks quite unnatural to me. On a technical level, the closer the vanishing point of the verticals (the image of the nadir point) is to the image, the more distorted and unnatural looking the perspective corrected image will be. Therefore, I also agree with Alvesgaspar's comments on the image immediately below: correcting all the verticals should not be a must and maybe the guidelines should be adjusted. Should we start a discussion about this point on the Discussion page? --Carsten Steger 10:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Agree with the idea of starting a discussion about the guidelines. Since the image guidelines apply to all image-related projects, the discussion should be broadly publicized. Alvesgaspar 18:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 17:28, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Shelburne_Falls_October_2021_005.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Deerfield River in Shelburne Falls, MA. --King of Hearts 04:53, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The verticals should be corrected IMO. --Ermell 22:20, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- As with the other image: The bottom edge is more than 45 degrees below vertical, and correcting it would lead to extremely unnatural distortion. When an image is only slightly off from normal perspective, it makes sense to correct, but here it is better to just have a natural aerial view. We shouldn't try to force perspective when it's halfway between perfectly vertical and perfectly straight down. --King of Hearts 04:32, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support This is a very nice picture and composition, with the technical flaws we would expect from a small drone camera. I quite agree that correcting all the verticals should not be a must, maybe the guidelines should be adjusted as to avoid the present fundamentalism on the subject. Alvesgaspar 18:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per Alvesgaspar and King of Hearts. Also see my comments on the image immediately above. --Carsten Steger 10:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 17:30, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Pabda_Jhaal_-_Home-_Kolkata_-_West_Bengak.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Pabda macher jhal. By User:Nilanjan Sasmal --Bodhisattwa 17:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment This is quite a solid QI, but it needs some more specific categories. How about Category:Fish curries of India and categories for the rice and the cilantro at least? -- Ikan Kekek 22:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good Quality --PetarM 21:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Added support template. --Mdaniels5757 23:21, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Oppose for now. More categories are needed.-- Ikan Kekek 21:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)- Comment @Ikan Kekek: , changed the category to Category:Fish curries of India. -- Bodhisattwa 19:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support good quality and very nice composition. Tournasol7 18:15, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support +1 --Stepro 22:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support More categories added. -- Ikan Kekek 08:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Tournasol7 -- Radomianin (talk) 11:37, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 17:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Playa_de_Comporta,_Portugal,_2021-09-12,_DD_15-26_PAN.jpg
[edit]- Nomination Beach of Comporta, Portugal --Poco a poco 11:27, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Unbalanced composition, which is an important part of quality. I don't like the uninteresting foregound combined with the little band of sea -- Alvesgaspar 15:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Composition IMO ok, it's a photo of the beach. --Kallerna 08:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek 19:45, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 23:59, 6 November 2021 (UTC)