User talk:Auntof6
|
2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 |
 First steps tutorialOur first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.  Getting helpMore information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
 Goodies, tips, and tricks
 Made a mistake?
|
Rd232 (talk) 14:29, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation pages are just terms
[edit]Hi. I am of the belief that disambiguation pages are just terms, not specific to some other classification. As if they are specific they are not so much disambiguation, as then we are starting a very weird path to a vague sort of classification. Here I am talking about something like Category:Disambiguation categories of artists. How can we sort and justify like that? — billinghurst sDrewth 10:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I probably wouldn't have created that (in 2021) if there hadn't already been similar categories. For example, the one for populated places (created in 2016) and the one for churches in Sweden (created in 2009). It helps people find links to specific kinds of things they'd like to disambiguate.
- I believe that the subcats of each of these categories are also in the main category, so they aren't removed from the main list. If that's not the case, it can be made so. -- Auntof6 (talk) 11:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have thrown a conversation into VP to address. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Photographs by date by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 16:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
«Вікі любить Землю» 2024 в Україні проходить з 1 по 31 липня!
[edit]
Доброго дня!
Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні раніше, тож приносимо вам важливу новину — Вікі любить Землю повернувся! Цього року конкурс відбувається протягом липня.
Як і в попередні роки, долучитися до змагання можуть усі охочі — як професійні фотографи, так і аматори. Головне, щоб ви любили Землю і розділяли ідею конкурсу — представити природно-заповідні території України за допомогою світлин під вільними ліцензіями. У Вікіпедії та Вікісховищі конкурсні фото будуть доступні тисячам людей.
Загальний формат конкурсу такий же, як у минулі роки. Стежте за новинами проєкту у Facebook, Instagram або в блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.
Важливо! Цього року з міркувань безпеки до участі у фотоконкурсі приймаються лише фото, зроблені до 31 березня 2024 року (включно) для звичайних фото та до 23 лютого 2022 року (включно) для знімків з дронів та інших літальних пристроїв.
Рекомендуємо уважно ознайомитись з правилами конкурсу та звернути увагу на вимоги щодо якості фотографій. Цьогоріч мінімальна роздільна здатність фотографій, які приймаються на конкурс, становить 2 Мп.
Сподіваємося на вашу участь у липні! -- Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 03:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Smoking (activity) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Josh (talk) 12:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
«Вікі любить Землю» 2024: декілька днів до завершення української частини конкурсу!
[edit]
Вітання!
Нагадуємо, що конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» 2024 в Україні триває вже більше трьох тижнів і до його завершення залишилось декілька днів. У вас ще є можливість завантажити свої унікальні фото української природи до 31 липня включно.
Вже майже 65 учасників та учасниць завантажили майже 4 000 світлин.
Важливо! Цього року з міркувань безпеки до участі у фотоконкурсі приймаються лише фото, зроблені до 31 березня 2024 року (включно) для звичайних фото та до 23 лютого 2022 року (включно) для знімків з дронів та інших літальних пристроїв.
Ви також можете подати свої фото для міжнародної спеціальної номінації «Права людини та довкілля», яка має на меті збільшити доступ до знань про захист довкілля та вплив людини на природу. Детальніше читайте тут.
Статті у Вікіпедії можна допоповнювати не лише фотографіями, а й відео. Для цього також проводимо окрему спецномінацію, де відзначаємо відеоролики, які зображають пам’ятки природи України. Відео цього року можна завантажувати як звичайні фото, вони будуть враховані на спеціальну номінацію автоматично.
Просимо уважно ознайомитись з правилами конкурсу та звернути увагу на вимоги щодо якості фотографій.
Приєднуйтеся та отримайте шанс на перемогу!
Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю».
Message sent over by Aafi on behalf of OlesiaLukaniuk (WMUA) through MassMessage. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
cranach
[edit]
please consider that we always have one separate category strings for the artist and one separate string for the museum to find the files and not to hide them. To sort after museum is only a second sorting and not instead of categories by the artist. Oursana (talk) 02:54, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Oursana: I'm not sure I understand. If the image is in Category:Prints by Lucas Cranach (I) in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, then it's under categories for both the artist and the museum. Can you explain more what your concern is? -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- with Prints by Lucas Cranach (I) in the Metropolitan Museum of Art the file is not really in both, because you have to go to all museums to find a file, therefore please always use two seperate category strings for artist, for museum, for item (agony in the garden). My concern is not to hide the files. With prints exclusively sorted into cats "prints by artist in museum x" you have to search many museums to find a file. Therefore they must be in two category strings, as "prints by artist in museum x" is not really for both, the sorting is in packages by museum. This is common practise on commons and I ask you to keep the seperate strings. This extra category string is very necessary and helpful and there is no argument to delete them, like you did with the above shown example. For prints with up to 20 and more identically versions the exclusive sorting by museum, seperates the many versions of the same print, which you cannot spread over the museum's categories, they must also be together in the artist's cat as a second and main category string. --Oursana (talk) 03:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Oursana: I think I understand your concern, but I don't completely agree with it. If you look in Category:Prints by museum by artist, you will see many categories like this, so it is common practice.
- I think the category Category:Prints by Lucas Cranach (I) in the Metropolitan Museum of Art needs to stay, but maybe the files in it can be in subcategories of Category:Prints by Lucas Cranach (I). For example, there could be Category:Religious prints by Lucas Cranach (I). That doesn't currently exist, but it could be created. That would make it easier to find the print you want. -- Auntof6 (talk) 03:29, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Commons practise are at least two category strings, therefore I am not against a museum's cat but for an extra cat string by artist, like you propose now and have to do also for non religious files. Category:Prints by museum by artist does not proof anything.Oursana (talk) 09:32, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- with Prints by Lucas Cranach (I) in the Metropolitan Museum of Art the file is not really in both, because you have to go to all museums to find a file, therefore please always use two seperate category strings for artist, for museum, for item (agony in the garden). My concern is not to hide the files. With prints exclusively sorted into cats "prints by artist in museum x" you have to search many museums to find a file. Therefore they must be in two category strings, as "prints by artist in museum x" is not really for both, the sorting is in packages by museum. This is common practise on commons and I ask you to keep the seperate strings. This extra category string is very necessary and helpful and there is no argument to delete them, like you did with the above shown example. For prints with up to 20 and more identically versions the exclusive sorting by museum, seperates the many versions of the same print, which you cannot spread over the museum's categories, they must also be together in the artist's cat as a second and main category string. --Oursana (talk) 03:22, 25 August 2024 (UTC)