User talk:Cephas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to commons Cephas. What better way than starting off with a Quality Image promotion could there be? :-) --QICbot (talk) 12:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ardea intermedia

[edit]

Hello friend. A nice 2024 for you. This map have to be updated after the split of Ardea plumifera and A. brachyrhyncha (Thanks for your maps on these two). Good updated map at Birds of the World. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 17:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this map is being used in a current Featured Article Candidate at the English Wikipedia and a question came up about the base map that was used. Can you confirm if File:Mexico template.svg was use as the base for this?

Thanks! Grungaloo (talk) 16:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Grungaloo I confirm that Mexico template.svg is the base map, but wait before any modification: since it is for a FA, I will make a better and more precise map. --Cephas (talk) 16:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phaethornis nattereri

[edit]

Hello friend, hope everything is fine. This map do not reflect current distribution in two isolated areas. See Birds of the World for correction. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 11:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks.--Hector Bottai (talk) 17:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phaethornis bourcieri

[edit]

Hello. This map is lacking an isolated population south of the Amazon (see Birds of the World), important because HBW/Birdlife claims to be a separate species Phaethornis major. Thanks Hector Bottai (talk) 17:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Hector Bottai. Hello Hector, I have questions about this map: I can use BOW for it, or combine maps of P. bourcieri and P. major of IUCN. I would prefer the last solution since updates are more recent on IUCN. What do you think? Also, once done, should I replace the actual map considering all Wps are not using the same classification?--Cephas (talk) 22:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. At this moment the split of P. major is weak. I would do only one map for bourcieri combining both as iucn and replace current. May be a different colour for P. major area would be perfect. Should this change in the future, we change. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 23:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!!--Hector Bottai (talk) 21:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phaethornis griseogularis

[edit]

Hello. This map is lacking the population of southwest Ecuador and nortwest Peru (see Phaethornis porcullae at IUCN), important because HBW/Birdlife claims to be a separate species Phaethornis porcullae. As in P. bourcieri, I think the best solution at this moment is merge both in one (griseogularis) with the porcullae area in different colour. Both maps are good at IUCN. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 21:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, perfect.--Hector Bottai (talk) 21:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anthracothorax prevostii

[edit]

Hello. This map needs to be updated, see very new one at Birds of the World. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 21:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thanks. --Hector Bottai (talk) 20:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heliangelus spencei

[edit]

Hello friend. Missing map for this species, good either IUCN or BOW. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 17:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--Hector Bottai (talk) 02:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heliangelus regalis

[edit]

Hello! This map needs update. This species is no longer endemic to Perú, but also present in south Ecuador. See IUCN and BOW. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 16:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carum carvi 15-p.bot-carum.carvi-09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wkee4ager (talk) 18:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]