User talk:DimiTalen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive: User:DimiTalen/Archive 1 · User:DimiTalen/Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matate valley seen from Tizi n'Aguersioual, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 15:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Tamguist from across the valley, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 15:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tabayat beach, towards the south, Timizguida Ouftas, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks, Touddmine beach, Tafedna, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cliffs to the north of Tafedna, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taftast Ouaoulil beaches, Tafedna, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amssakrou, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 16:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sculpted calligraphy on the walls, Ben Youssef Madrasa, Marrakech, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Pont d'Iéna from Trocadéro, Paris, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Young child surrounded by pigeons, Eminönü Square, Istanbul, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:17, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request, as linked above: not including reason, year, month, or day; not creating the subpage; and not transcluding. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests."   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, and thanks for the clear instructions. DimiTalen 18:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Footpath in Les Eucherts, with a view towards Les Arcs, La Rosière, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TSK Bellecombe 1 base station, La Rosière, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 06:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Mont Blanc from below Chaz Dura, La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 06:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of La Thuile from the Bosco Express chairlift, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Alparena, Les Eucherts, La Rosière, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok imo. --ArildV 06:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Photogenic mountain along the Ponteilles slope, La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 07:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ascending TSD Fourclaz Express, La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Looking up the Belvedere slope, La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View towards Monte Paramont from Col de la Fourclaz, La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 07:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Descending the San Bernardo slope towards the Fourclaz Express, La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 07:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Village des Eucherts and the ski school in the evening, Les Eucherts, La Rosière, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 17:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Looking down the Liaison slope towards La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:25, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pointe Rousse seen from Plan du Repos, Montvalezan, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --TOUMOU 08:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Line De Witte, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Line De Witte, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Syunsyunminmin (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Amina Vandenheuvel, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Amina Vandenheuvel, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Syunsyunminmin (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Amina Vandenheuvel on a white background, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Amina Vandenheuvel on a white background, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Syunsyunminmin (talk) 13:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Looking down Molenstraat from the IJzeren Brug intersection, Wetteren, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not very sharp but OK. Good composition. --Augustgeyler 08:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inui Kotenshu roof details seen from the Dai-Tenshu, Matsumoto Castle, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 19:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matsumoto Tourist Hotel, Fukashi 2-chome, Matsumoto, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:40, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veldwegel, Wetteren, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very soft, but OK. Good composition. --Augustgeyler 15:21, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kawaguchiko rowing center jetties on Lake Kawaguchi, with Mount Setto in the background, Fujikawaguchiko, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurotunnel Shuttle terminal building, with the Cité Europe shopping center in the background, Coquelles, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! High Street at the Ashley Road and Waterloo Road intersection, Epsom, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Looking down Rue du Gros-Horloge, with balloons, Rouen, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:54, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This doesnt seem to be connected to Liberalism, which is a political category. Rathfelder (talk) 10:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How familiar are you with the political pillars in Belgian civil society? DimiTalen 10:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is an insurance company. You think it has political significance? Rathfelder (talk) 21:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a fact. I recommend you read up on the history of the mutualities of Belgium. The social-democrat, christian-democrat, liberal, neutral and independent/libre mutualities are all born out of political movements and each of them retains institutional links to other representatives of their respective ideologies, like the political parties and unions. This is clearest for the largest forces in the landscape, the social-democrats and the christian-democrats, but also holds for the liberals. This memo from LM from 2011 explicitly states: "We zijn echter een liberale mutualiteit en daarom pleiten wij al tientallen jaren voor een structureel en bestendig overleg met Open Vld en MR." (We are however a liberal mutuality and therefore we have been pleading for decades for structural, permanent dialogue with Open Vld and MR [the two liberal parties]). --DimiTalen 05:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall, Houlgate, 2024 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 23:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Looking up Rue de la Chaussée from Rue Notre-Dame, Honfleur, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:43, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]