User talk:Doremo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Doremo!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Doremo!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorizacija

[edit]

Slike naj bi bile v najnižjih možnih kategorijah, da je kategorizacija čim bolj uporabna in pregledna. Zato sem mdr. npr. odstranil kategorijo Bridges in Ljubljana iz slike Kavsek Bridge - Ljubljana Slovenia - south side.JPG, ker je že kategorija Kavšek Bridge v tej kategoriji, zato bi to pomenilo podvajanje.--Sporti (talk) 12:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala! Doremo (talk) 12:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pa še: poglej na dnu strani, kjer so navedene kategorije, ker dodajaš iste še enkrat. --Sporti (talk) 12:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala še enkrat. Pravkar sem videl problem; bot je napisal, da so slike nekategorizirane, torej sem jih kar dodal brez pregleda. Doremo (talk) 12:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poglej kako so kategorizirane tvoje doslej naložene slike in poskusi za naprej naredit nekaj podobnega. --Sporti (talk) 11:13, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bom to malo študiral, da videm, kako naj bo. Doslej sem imel težave s spustnim menijem pri naložitvi (da tam nisem našel pravih kategorij) oz. s kopiranjem kategorij iz WP (da so bile rdečo označene kot neznane). Doremo (talk) 11:26, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lahko si pomagaš npr. s HotCat (omogočiš ga pod nastavitve/vtičniki), ki ti prikaže vse možnosti, ko začneš pisat ime kategorije. --Sporti (talk) 11:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hvala, HotCat bo res koristen, sem ga pravkar omogočil in probal. Doremo (talk) 12:10, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 16:55, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Vojko's Plaque.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 17:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Javorca Slovenia - Church of the Holy Spirit interior.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 21:28, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

-- Eleassar (t/p) 15:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, File:Ljubljana Slovenia - Vidmar house memorial.JPG was proposed for deletion at the same request as work of Plečnik. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:25, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 09:55, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Dobrunje WWI plaque.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 14:02, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:


Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Bust of France Bevk.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 16:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection to deletion of this image from Commons. Doremo (talk) 16:38, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Predloge za Slovenijo

[edit]

Zdravo, zdaj imamo naslednji predlogi za Slovenijo: Template:PD-Slovenia in Template:PD-Slovenia-exempt (velja tudi za slikovna gradiva v uradnem listu, ne samo za tekst).[1] (str. 28) --Eleassar (t/p) 13:15, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hvala, predlagal sem neke slovnične in pomenske popravke za Template:PD-Slovenia. Doremo (talk) 14:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 15:49, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File:Videm Dobrepolje Slovenia - church.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 23:22, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This facade seems quite new. It probably does not belong to Commons. --Eleassar (t/p) 23:22, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Horjul Slovenia - wayside shrine.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 10:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 13:33, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 20:20, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Baca pri Modreju Slovenia - memorial.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 09:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ljubljana - Nagode house.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 10:31, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may freely upload this and other photographs of architectural works to the English Wikipedia. Please tag them with en:Template:FoP-USonly. Regards, --Eleassar (t/p) 10:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Doremo (talk) 10:40, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've uploaded the file here. I'd be grateful if you could check that the parameters are OK. Doremo (talk) 10:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate this; thank you. The parameters are ok. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image categorisation

[edit]

Hi, please try to be a bit more precise with categories. Otherwise, I have to correct after you. See e.g. [2], [3] etc. If a category doesn't exist yet, you may also create a new one. Thanks. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:37, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate the improvements. Doremo (talk) 09:39, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Novi Lazi Slovenia - church site.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:50, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brebovnica Slovenia - crucifix.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there is an image of a man in the upper left corner of the image, which doesn't seem de minimis. In my opinion it would be best to crop it out or mask it. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, could you please verify the text of the inscription. It is not directly visible in the image, however the text in the description of the image contains some mistakes in regard to capitalisation and spelling. Is this truly the text as written on the plaque? --Eleassar (t/p) 07:17, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited out the image from the signpost. I've also removed an extra space in the transcription. Unfortunate, I no longer have a high-resolution image to check against. However, I think it would be appropriate if you made any other necessary changes to the text. The original text is probably in ALL CAPITALS, but the transcription needn't follow that format. Doremo (talk) 08:30, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've rectified the mistakes as it would be customary in Slovene, however without being able to check against a photo it is not necessarily correct. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The ALL CAPS style means that any such corrections are possible regardless of the original text; the only content question is whether I missed the "j" in the original inscription. But, in any case, it is certainly the message that was intended. Doremo (talk) 09:57, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Krizevska Vas Dol pri Ljubljani Slovenia - church.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 09:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Former villages in Slovenia

[edit]

Hi, I've created the category 'Former villages in Slovenia'. It would be much appreciated if you could have a look and added the categories that you have created (and possibly also others) to it, where appropriate. Regards, --Eleassar (t/p) 10:41, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Doremo (talk) 10:43, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anthem of Slovenia

[edit]

Hi, could you please have a look at File:Himna Republike Slovenije.jpg and correct the grammatical errors and any mistranslations in the text of the anthem? Best regards, --Eleassar (t/p) 09:47, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some changes; I've used "prosper" as a liberal interpretation of živé (it sounds nice) and used some more natural plurals where the original has singulars. Doremo (talk) 10:19, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. "All our countryman" is correct or should it be "all our countrymen"? --Eleassar (t/p) 10:31, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My error, thanks! (I changed it several times and didn't read it all the way through after the last change.) Doremo (talk) 10:47, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Osredek Slovenia - wayside shrine.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 23:34, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crucifix - Podlipoglav Slovenia.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 23:38, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Postaja Tolmin Slovenia - fortification.JPG

[edit]

Nice image! --Eleassar (t/p) 20:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Doremo (talk) 20:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Shrine - Sujica Slovenia.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 08:18, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Križevec Slovenia - closed chapel-shrine.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 08:21, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Žažar Slovenia - Shrine to Our Lady of Peace.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 08:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I really don't understand why this image of St. Christoper differs from this one: both are located at the same place. Do you perhaps have any explanation? --Eleassar (t/p) 23:23, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Enciklopedija Slovenija (volume 3, 1989, page 314) states that the Saint Christopher fresco is "... v 2 plasteh iz 14. in 15. st." ('... in two layers from the 14th and 15th centuries'). Presumably the newer layer was removed at some point after 1989 to reveal the older image in my 2013 photo. Doremo (talk) 04:46, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The two layers are also discussed here (page 205): [4]. Doremo (talk) 04:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This makes sense. I've amended the categories accordingly. Thank you. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:33, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please amend the description of File:Trnovec Slovenia - Partisan memorial.JPG - it says 'Topol pri Trnovec'? What was meant here - Topol pri Trnovcu, Topol pri Medvodah? Thanks. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:59, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've fixed it. Doremo (talk) 14:53, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Rakovnik Slovenia - wayside shrine.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 21:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Žlebe Slovenia - wayside shrine.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 22:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doremo, I'm not sure what does 'communist activists' refer to in the image description of File:Dobrunje beech trees.JPG and File:Dobrunje rectory.JPG. Were they simply Partisans or some higher ranking Communists? --Eleassar (t/p) 20:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The information sign says "... zasliševali, mučili in ubijali borce ter aktiviste Osvobodilne fronte." The "borce" would be Partisans and the "aktiviste" would be other unspecified activists (informers? spies? civilian organizers?) allied with the communist movement. Doremo (talk) 04:14, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could be, but it must also be considered that the Liberation Front was a wide coalition that included a number of suborganisations and other activists does not necessarily mean they were Communists. Per B. Repe: "Partizanska vojska je bila zgolj »udarna pest« mnogo širše in razvejane odporniške organizacije, ki je bila do marca 1943 tudi koalicijska."[5] There is also not necessary a distinction between 'fighters' and 'activists'; they could be both at the same time. I suggest replacing 'Communist activists' with 'activists of the Liberation Front', as stated in the source, to avoid original interpretation. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:46, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Doremo (talk) 09:06, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:23, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Birtic Shrine - Dobrova Slovenia.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 22:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dobrunje.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nthep (talk) 21:52, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi, Doremo. When you create new categories, e.g. Category:Malo Črnelo, please, also add links to Wikipedia (in the lower left corner). For this category, I have already done it. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:24, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Doremo (talk) 14:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments - Slovenia edition

[edit]

Hi. Since you regularly contribute photos of various places around Slovenia, you might be interested in this year's Wiki Loves Monuments competition that we're organizing in Slovenia for the first time. See Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Slovenia that is being prepared. If you have any pictures of monuments in store that you haven't uploaded yet, you might want to wait until next month, so they are eligible (there's no rule about when a photo is taken, as long as it's uploaded during September). Feel free to contact with any questions. — Yerpo Eh? 12:02, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Doremo (talk) 12:07, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 04:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Doremo (talk) 05:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

[edit]

Hi Doremo. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:25, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I had trouble finding the appropriate template; the instructions were not intuitive. Doremo (talk) 13:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]