Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
skip to main content
research-article

Towards a highly effective and robust Web credibility evaluation system

Published: 01 November 2015 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    By leveraging crowdsourcing, Web credibility evaluation systems (WCESs) have become a promising tool to assess the credibility of Web content, e.g., Web pages. However, existing systems adopt a passive way to collect users' credibility ratings, which incurs two crucial challenges: (1) a considerable fraction of Web content have few or even no ratings, so the coverage (or effectiveness) of the system is low; (2) malicious users may submit fake ratings to damage the reliability of the system. In order to realize a highly effective and robust WCES, we propose to integrate recommendation functionality into the system. On the one hand, by fusing Matrix Factorization and Latent Dirichlet Allocation, a personalized Web content recommendation model is proposed to attract users to rate more Web pages, i.e., the coverage is increased. On the other hand, by analyzing a user's reaction to the recommended Web content, we detect imitating attackers, which have recently been recognized as a particular threat to WCES to make the system more robust. Moreover, an adaptive reputation system is designed to motivate users to more actively interact with the integrated recommendation functionality. We conduct experiments using both real datasets and synthetic data to demonstrate how our proposed recommendation components significantly improve the effectiveness and robustness of existing WCES. We study methods to improve efficiency of crowdsourcing Web credibility evaluation systems (WCESs).Recommendation algorithm (RA) increases coverage in WCES.Joint application of RA and reputation system helps fight down imitation attacks.

    References

    [1]
    Gediminas Adomavicius, Alexander Tuzhilin, Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 17 (June 2005) 734-749.
    [2]
    Deepak Agarwal, Bee-Chung Chen, fLDA: matrix factorization through latent Dirichlet allocation, in: Proceedings of the Third ACM WSDM, 2010.
    [3]
    R. Bartoszynski, M. Niewiadomska-Bugaj, Probability and Statistical Inference, Wiley-Interscience, 2008.
    [4]
    David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, Michael I. Jordan, Latent Dirichlet allocation, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3 (2003) 993-1022.
    [5]
    Carlos Castillo, Marcelo Mendoza, Barbara Poblete, Information credibility on twitter, in: Proceedings of the 20th WWW, 2011.
    [6]
    B.J. Fogg, Jonathan Marshall, Othman Laraki, Alex Osipovich, Chris Varma, Nicholas Fang, Jyoti Paul, Akshay Rangnekar, John Shon, Preeti Swani, Marissa Treinen, What makes web sites credible?: a report on a large quantitative study, in: Proceedings of SIGCHI, 2001.
    [7]
    B.J. Fogg, Hsiang Tseng, The elements of computer credibility, in: Proceedings of SIGCHI, 1999.
    [8]
    Rainer Gemulla, Erik Nijkamp, Peter J. Haas, Yannis Sismanis, Large-scale matrix factorization with distributed stochastic gradient descent, in: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD, 2011.
    [9]
    R. Ismail, A. Josang, The beta reputation system, in: Proceedings of the 15th Bled Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2002.
    [10]
    Audun Jøsang, Roslan Ismail, Colin Boyd, A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision, Decis. Support. Syst., 43 (2007) 618-644.
    [11]
    Michal Kakol, Michal Jankowski-Lorek, Katarzyna Abramczuk, Adam Wierzbicki, Michele Catasta, On the subjectivity and bias of web content credibility evaluations, in: The 3rd Joint WICOW/AIRWeb Workshop on Web Quality (with WWW 2013), 2013.
    [12]
    Y. Koren, R. Bell, C. Volinsky, Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems, Computer, 42 (2009) 30-37.
    [13]
    Xin Liu, Karl Aberer, Soco: a social network aided context-aware recommender systems, in: Proceedings of the 22nd WWW, 2013.
    [14]
    Xin Liu, Radoslaw Nielek, Adam Wierzbicki, Karl Aberer, Defending imitating attacks in web credibility evaluation systems, in: The 3rd Joint WICOW/AIRWeb Workshop on Web Quality (with WWW 2013), 2013.
    [15]
    Hao Ma, Dengyong Zhou, Chao Liu, Michael R. Lyu, Irwin King, Recommender systems with social regularization, in: Proceedings of the 4th ACM WSDM, 2011.
    [16]
    Julian McAuley, Jure Leskovec, Hidden factors and hidden topics: understanding rating dimensions with review text, in: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 2013.
    [17]
    Alexandra Olteanu, Stanislav Peshterliev, Xin Liu, Karl Aberer, Web credibility: features exploration and credibility prediction, in: Proceedings of 35th ECIR, 2011.
    [18]
    Thanasis G. Papaioannou, Jean-Eudes Ranvier, Alexandra Olteanu, Karl Aberer, A decentralized recommender system for effective web credibility assessment, in: Proceedings of the 21st ACM CIKM, 2012.
    [19]
    Ana-Maria Popescu, Marco Pennacchiotti, Detecting controversial events from twitter, in: Proceedings of the 19th ACM CIKM, 2010.
    [20]
    Julia Schwarz, Meredith Morris, Augmenting web pages and search results to support credibility assessment, in: Proceedings of SIGCHI, 2011.
    [21]
    Mehrbod Sharifi, Eugene Fink, Jaime G. Carbonell, SmartNotes: application of crowdsourcing to the detection of web threats, in: Proceedings of IEEE SMC, 2011.
    [22]
    M. Sharifi, E. Fink, J.G. Carbonell, Detection of internet scam using logistic regression, in: Proceedings of IEEE SMC, 2011.
    [23]
    W.T. Teacy, Jigar Patel, Nicholas R. Jennings, Michael Luck, Travos: trust and reputation in the context of inaccurate information sources, Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst., 12 (2006) 183-198.
    [24]
    Yusuke Yamamoto, Katsumi Tanaka, Enhancing credibility judgment of web search results, in: Proceedings of SIGCHI, 2011.

    Cited By

    View all

    Index Terms

    1. Towards a highly effective and robust Web credibility evaluation system
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      Decision Support Systems  Volume 79, Issue C
      November 2015
      209 pages

      Publisher

      Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

      Netherlands

      Publication History

      Published: 01 November 2015

      Author Tags

      1. Imitating attack
      2. Recommendation
      3. Robustness
      4. Web credibility

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2020)Fake News and Aggregated CredibilityInternational Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence10.4018/IJACI.20201001.oa111:4(93-117)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020
      • (2020)A Survey of Fake NewsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/339504653:5(1-40)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2020
      • (2020)True Or False: How Does Our Brain Decide About Truth?2020 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB)10.1109/CIBCB48159.2020.9277701(1-9)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2020
      • (2020)Look Who’s Talking: Modeling Decision Making Based on Source CredibilityComputational Science – ICCS 202010.1007/978-3-030-50371-0_24(327-341)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2020
      • (2020)How You Say or What You Say? Neural Activity in Message Credibility EvaluationComputational Science – ICCS 202010.1007/978-3-030-50371-0_23(312-326)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2020
      • (2017)Modeling and Evaluating a Robust Feedback-Based Reputation System for E-Commerce PlatformsACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/305726511:3(1-55)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2017
      • (2017)The BIG CHASEDecision Support Systems10.1016/j.dss.2017.04.00798:C(49-58)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017
      • (2016)Web Content Classification Using Distributions of Subjective Quality EvaluationsACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/299413210:4(1-30)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2016
      • (2016)The Challenge of Improving Credibility of User-Generated Content in Online Social NetworksJournal of Data and Information Quality10.1145/28990037:3(1-4)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2016

      View Options

      View options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media