ABSTRACT
The explosive growth of fake news and its erosion to democracy, justice, and public trust increased the demand for fake news detection. As an interdisciplinary topic, the study of fake news encourages a concerted effort of experts in computer and information science, political science, journalism, social science, psychology, and economics. A comprehensive framework to systematically understand and detect fake news is necessary to attract and unite researchers in related areas to conduct research on fake news. This tutorial aims to clearly present (1) fake news research, its challenges, and research directions; (2) a comparison between fake news and other related concepts (e.g., rumors); (3) the fundamental theories developed across various disciplines that facilitate interdisciplinary research; (4) various detection strategies unified under a comprehensive framework for fake news detection; and (5) the state-of-the-art datasets, patterns, and models. We present fake news detection from various perspectives, which involve news content and information in social networks, and broadly adopt techniques in data mining, machine learning, natural language processing, information retrieval and social search. Facing the upcoming 2020 U.S. presidential election, challenges for automatic, effective and efficient fake news detection are also clarified in this tutorial.
- Hunt Allcott and Matthew Gentzkow. 2017. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 31, 2 (2017), 211--36.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Blake E Ashforth and Fred Mael. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, Vol. 14, 1 (1989), 20--39.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Xin Dong, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Geremy Heitz, Wilko Horn, Ni Lao, Kevin Murphy, Thomas Strohmann, Shaohua Sun, and Wei Zhang. 2014. Knowledge vault: A web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 601--610. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Nitin Jindal and Bing Liu. 2008. Opinion spam and analysis. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 219--230. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- David MJ Lazer, Matthew A Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J Berinsky, Kelly M Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, et almbox. 2018. The science of fake news. Science, Vol. 359, 6380 (2018), 1094--1096.Google Scholar
- Raymond S Nickerson. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of general psychology, Vol. 2, 2 (1998), 175.Google Scholar
- Jay Pujara and Sameer Singh. 2018. Mining Knowledge Graphs From Text. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 789--790. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- K Rapoza. 2017. Can `fake news' impact the stock market?Google Scholar
- Kai Shu, H Russell Bernard, and Huan Liu. 2018a. Studying Fake News via Network Analysis: Detection and Mitigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.10233 (2018).Google Scholar
- Kai Shu, Deepak Mahudeswaran, Suhang Wang, Dongwon Lee, and Huan Liu. 2018b. FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context and Dynamic Information for Studying Fake News on Social Media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.01286 (2018).Google Scholar
- Kai Shu, Amy Sliva, Suhang Wang, Jiliang Tang, and Huan Liu. 2017. Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, Vol. 19, 1 (2017), 22--36. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Craig Silverman. 2016. This analysis shows how viral fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. BuzzFeed News, Vol. 16 (2016).Google Scholar
- Alexander Smith and Vladimir Banic. 2016. Fake News: How a partying Macedonian teen earns thousands publishing lies. NBC News, Vol. 9 (2016).Google Scholar
- Udo Undeutsch. 1967. Beurteilung der glaubhaftigkeit von aussagen. Handbuch der psychologie, Vol. 11 (1967), 26--181.Google Scholar
- Liang Wu, Fred Morstatter, Xia Hu, and Huan Liu. 2016. Mining misinformation in social media. Big Data in Complex and Social Networks (2016), 123--152.Google Scholar
- Xinyi Zhou and Reza Zafarani. 2018. Fake News: A Survey of Research, Detection Methods, and Opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2492706 (2018).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Fake News: Fundamental Theories, Detection Strategies and Challenges
Recommendations
Fake News Detection: An Interdisciplinary Research
WWW '19: Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web ConferenceThe explosive growth of fake news and its erosion to democracy, journalism and economy has increased the demand for fake news detection. To achieve efficient and explainable fake news detection, an interdisciplinary approach is required, relying on ...
Falling for Fake News: Investigating the Consumption of News via Social Media
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn the so called 'post-truth' era, characterized by a loss of public trust in various institutions, and the rise of 'fake news' disseminated via the internet and social media, individuals may face uncertainty about the veracity of information available, ...
Fake News Research: Theories, Detection Strategies, and Open Problems
KDD '19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data MiningFake news has become a global phenomenon due its explosive growth, particularly on social media. The goal of this tutorial is to (1) clearly introduce the concept and characteristics of fake news and how it can be formally differentiated from other ...
Comments