Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook
skip to main content
research-article

Deep Multi-Task Learning Based Urban Air Quality Index Modelling

Published: 29 March 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Obtaining comprehensive air quality information can help protect human health from air pollution. Existing spatially fine-grained estimation methods and forecasting methods have the following problems: 1) Only a part of data related to air quality is considered. 2) Features are defined and extracted artificially. 3) Due to the lack of training samples, they usually cannot achieve good generalization performance. Therefore, we propose a deep multi-task learning (MTL) based urban air quality index (AQI) modelling method (PANDA). On one hand, a variety of air quality-related urban big data (meteorology, traffic, factory air pollutant emission, point of interest (POI) distribution, road network distribution, etc.) are considered. Deep neural networks are used to learn the representations of these relevant spatial and sequential data, as well as to build the correlation between AQI and these representations. On the other hand, PANDA solves spatially fine-grained AQI level estimation task and AQI forecasting task jointly, which can leverage the commonalities and differences between these two tasks to improve generalization performance. We evaluate PANDA on the dataset of Hangzhou city. The experimental results show that our method can yield a better performance compared to the state-of-the-art methods.

References

[1]
N. Kh. Arystanbekova. 2014. Application of gaussian plume models for air pollution simulation at instantaneous emissions. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 67, 4--5 (2004), 451--458.
[2]
Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473.
[3]
Paul E. Benson. 1984. CALINE 4-A dispersion model for predicting air pollutant concentrations near roadways. No. FHWA-CA-TL-84-15 Final Rpt.
[4]
Avrim Blum and Tom Mitchell. 1998. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory (COLT '98). ACM, 92--100.
[5]
J. Den Boeft, H. C. Eerens, W. A. M. Den Tonkelaar, and P. Y. J. Zandveld. 1996. CAR International: A simple model to determine city street air quality. Science of the Total Environment 189, (1996), 321--326.
[6]
David J. Briggs, Susan Collins, Paul Elliott, Paul Fischer, Simon Kingham, Eric Lebret, Karel Pryl, Hans Van Reeuwijk, Kirsty Smallbone, and Andre Van Der Veen. 1997. Mapping urban air pollution using GIS: A regression-based approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 11, 7 (1997), 699--718.
[7]
Ling Chen, Yaya Cai, Yifang Ding, Mingqi Lv, Cuili Yuan, and Gencai Chen. 2016. Spatially fine-grained urban air quality estimation using ensemble semi-supervised learning and pruning. In Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '16). ACM, 1076--1087.
[8]
Weiyu Cheng, Yanyan Shen, Yanmin Zhu, and Linpeng Huang. 2018. A neural attention model for urban air quality inference: Learning the weights of monitoring stations. In Proceedings of AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '18). AAAI, 2151--2158.
[9]
Junyoung Chung, Caglar Gulcehre, KyungHyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555.
[10]
W. Geoffrey Cobourn and Milton C. Hubbard. 1999. An enhanced ozone forecasting model using air mass trajectory analysis. Atmospheric Environment 33, 28 (1999), 4663--4674.
[11]
Aoife Donnelly, Bruce Misstear, and Brian Broderick. 2015. Real time air quality forecasting using integrated parametric and non-parametric regression techniques. Atmospheric Environment 103, (2015), 53--65.
[12]
D. Deniz Genc, Canan Yesilyurt, and Gurdal Tuncel. 2010. Air pollution forecasting in Ankara, Turkey using air pollution index and its relation to assimilative capacity of the atmosphere. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 166, 1--4 (2010), 11--27.
[13]
David Hasenfratz, Olga Saukh, Christoph Walser, Christoph Hueglin, Martin Fierz, and Lothar Thiele. 2014. Pushing the spatiotemporal resolution limit of urban air pollution maps. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom '14). IEEE, 69--77.
[14]
Ole Hertel and Ruwim Berkowicz. 1989. Modelling pollution from traffic in a street canyon: Evaluation of data and model development. DMU LUFF-AU9. National Environmental Research Institute, Roskilde, Denmark.
[15]
Gerard Hoek, Rob Beelen, Kees de Hoogh, Danielle Vienneau, John Gulliver, Paul Fischer, and David Briggs. 2008. A review of land-use regression models to assess spatial variation of outdoor air pollution. Atmospheric Environment 42, 33 (2008), 7561--7578.
[16]
Mark Z Jacobson. 2001. GATOR-GCMM: A global-through urban-scale air pollution and weather forecast model, 1. Model design and treatment of subgrid soil, vegetation, roads, rooftops, water, sea ice, and snow. Journal of Geophysical Research 106, D6 (2001), 5385--5401.
[17]
Arnaud Jutzeler, Jason Jingshi Li, and Boi Faltings. 2014. A region-based model for estimating urban air pollution. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '14). AAAI, 424--430.
[18]
Saori Kashima, Takashi Yorifuji, Toshihide Tsuda, and Hiroyuki Doi. 2009. Application of land use regression to regulatory air quality data in Japan. Science of the Total Environment 407, 8 (2009), 3055--3062.
[19]
Minjoong J. Kim, Rokjin J. Park, and Jae-Jin Kim. 2012. Urban air quality modeling with full O3-Nox-VOC chemistry: Implications for O3 and PM air quality in a street canyon. Atmospheric Environment 47, (2012), 330--340.
[20]
Ujjwal Kumar and V. K. Jain. 2010. ARIMA forecasting of ambient air pollutants (O3, NO, NO2 and CO). Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 24, 5 (2010), 751--760.
[21]
Patrick H. Ryan and Grace K. LeMasters. 2007. A review of land-use regression models for characterizing intraurban air pollution exposure. Inhalation Toxicology 19, sup1 (2007), 127--133.
[22]
Rouzbeh Shad, Mohammad Saadi Mesgari, and Arefeh Shad. 2009. Predicting air pollution using fuzzy genetic linear membership kriging in GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 33, 6 (2009), 472--481.
[23]
Rongrong Wang, Sarah B. Henderson, Hind Sbihi, Ryan W. Allen, and Michael Brauer. 2013. Temporal stability of land use regression models for traffic-related air pollution. Atmospheric Environment 64, (2013), 312--319.
[24]
Peter Whittle. 1951. Hypothesis Testing in Time Series Analysis. Almqvist and Wiksells.
[25]
Yu Zheng, Furui Liu, and Hsun-Ping Hsieh. 2013. U-air: When urban air quality inference meets big data. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '13). ACM, 1436--1444.
[26]
Yu Zheng, Xiuwen Yi, Ming Li, Ruiyuan Li, Zhangqing Shan, Eric Chang, and Tianrui Li. 2015. Forecasting fine-grained air quality based on big data. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '15). ACM, 2267--2276.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Complex Real-Time Monitoring and Decision-Making Assistance System Based on Hybrid Forecasting Module and Social Network AnalysisSystems10.3390/systems1202003912:2(39)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Deep Citywide Multisource Data Fusion-Based Air Quality EstimationIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics10.1109/TCYB.2023.324561854:1(111-122)Online publication date: Jan-2024
  • (2024)Estimating Black Carbon Levels With Proxy Variables and Low-Cost SensorsIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2024.336197711:10(17577-17588)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Deep Multi-Task Learning Based Urban Air Quality Index Modelling

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 3, Issue 1
    March 2019
    786 pages
    EISSN:2474-9567
    DOI:10.1145/3323054
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 March 2019
    Accepted: 01 January 2019
    Revised: 01 November 2018
    Received: 01 August 2018
    Published in IMWUT Volume 3, Issue 1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Air quality estimation
    2. air quality forecasting
    3. deep learning
    4. graph embedding
    5. multi-task learning

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)80
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 29 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Complex Real-Time Monitoring and Decision-Making Assistance System Based on Hybrid Forecasting Module and Social Network AnalysisSystems10.3390/systems1202003912:2(39)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Deep Citywide Multisource Data Fusion-Based Air Quality EstimationIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics10.1109/TCYB.2023.324561854:1(111-122)Online publication date: Jan-2024
    • (2024)Estimating Black Carbon Levels With Proxy Variables and Low-Cost SensorsIEEE Internet of Things Journal10.1109/JIOT.2024.336197711:10(17577-17588)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
    • (2024)Medium-Term AQI Prediction in Selected Areas of Bangladesh Based on Bidirectional GRU Network ModelSN Computer Science10.1007/s42979-024-02971-65:5Online publication date: 8-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Group-Aware Graph Neural Network for Nationwide City Air Quality ForecastingACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/3631713Online publication date: 4-Nov-2023
    • (2023)Classifying Air Quality Using Machine Learning Models2023 IEEE 14th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON)10.1109/UEMCON59035.2023.10316018(0459-0463)Online publication date: 12-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Towards Real-time Outdoor Air Quality Prediction Using a Hybrid Model Based on Internet of Things Devices2023 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT)10.1109/COMNETSAT59769.2023.10420823(683-688)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2023
    • (2023)ASTGC: Attention-based Spatio-temporal Fusion Graph Convolution Model for Fine-grained Air Quality AnalysisAir Quality, Atmosphere & Health10.1007/s11869-023-01369-216:9(1761-1775)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2023
    • (2022)Forecasting Fine-Grained Air Quality for Locations without Monitoring Stations Based on a Hybrid Predictor with Spatial-Temporal Attention Based NetworkApplied Sciences10.3390/app1209426812:9(4268)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2022
    • (2022)iSprayProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/35172276:1(1-29)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media