| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the At-Talaq article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
| This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct. |
 | It is requested that one or more audio files be included in this article to improve its quality. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request. |
Child marriage
editThe same issue cropped up at the talk page of Iddah. Agree that "giving three commentaries on a single verse and not giving even a single commentary of other verses shows that article have undue weight." Especially when the same commentaries are mentioned multiple times in different sections. Recommend reduction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.37.157.231 (talk) 02:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Can you perhaps look at reducing the passage to some extent in that case? Could that help? --Tomb Blaster (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Done--- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.37.157.231 (talk) 08:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Certainly better. I'm not truly qualified to comment on the WEIGHT aspect which is separate from whether things are sourced. Either way what we have now is better than a blanket revert. --Tomb Blaster (talk) 16:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)