This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Love dart article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Love dart was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 9, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that some hermaphrodite snails and slugs pierce each other with love darts (pictured) during mating? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Gastropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of gastropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. | This article is within the scope of||
High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. | |
Taxonomy: For all marine species, Project Gastropods uses the taxonomy in the online database WoRMS. When starting a new article, do not use sources of taxonomic information that predate the 2017 revision for all gastropod groups ("Revised Classification, Nomenclator and Typification of Gastropod and Monoplacophoran Families" by Philippe Bouchet & Jean-Pierre Rocroi, Bernhard Hausdorf, Andrzej Kaim, Yasunori Kano, Alexander Nützel, Pavel Parkhaev, Michael Schrödl and Ellen E. Strong in Malacologia, 2017, 61(1–2): 1–526.) (can be dowloaded at Researchgate.net), substituting the previous classification of 2005 Taxonomy of the Gastropoda (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005). If you need help with any aspect of an article, please leave a note at the Project talk page. |
This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject Animals | ||
Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. |
other species
editStaffordia daflaensis (valid species?, family?) - Godwin-Austen H. H. 1908. Mollusca. Testacellidae and Zonitidae. Taylor & Francis, London, page 297. --Snek01 (talk) 22:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- This species is in the family Staffordiidae. Whether this species name is still considered a valid name I do not know. It is mentioned here: [1]Invertzoo (talk) 22:09, 14 August 2010 (UTC)] and here: [2]]
GA Reassessment
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
This article looks pretty bad. There seems to be numerous uncited material such as
- In some languages, the dart that these snails use before mating is known as an "arrow". For example, in German it is called a Liebespfeil or "love arrow", and in Czech it is šíp lásky (which means "arrow of love").
- possibly many things in the tables
Then there's the fact that this article is mostly empty and likely fails broadness. There are three tables that are completely empty, 2 tables that are incomplete and other tables who may not be cited. There needs to be some fixing here. Onegreatjoke (talk) 15:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Tables have been empty since 2008. Wow. Not good at all. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: Going to delist this for 2a (missing citations), but I disagree on broadness. Some empty tables are a layout issue (1b) / a comprehensiveness issue (at FA level). But there is plenty of material in existing tables to meet the broadness criterion. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)