Svoboda | Graniru | BBC Russia | Golosameriki | Facebook

Talk:Thomas Helwys

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
WikiProject iconNottinghamshire Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Nottinghamshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WikiProject icon
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.


POV tag added

edit

Oh dear. I'm not sure whether to revert this rewrite of the article or not; on the one hand it introduces lots of new information about the subject, but on the other it's horrendously POV-ridden, using completely inappropriate terms such as "victim", "bravely", "courageous", &c. Could an editor who is familiar with the subject matter do a thorough POV cleanup? DWaterson 00:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Is it unreasonable, or even 'POV-ridden', to describe a man who died in prison soley because of his religious beliefs as a 'victim' of state persecution? Also, given that a Baptist had recently been burnt at the stake for 'heresy', surely it is beyond dispute that Helwys descision to return from exile was 'brave'? Of course, it is possible to write about extra-ordinary lives in such a dry way as to minimise their significance, but I would argue that THIS would have call into question the neutrality of the author! Yozzer66 13:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
Unfortunately, official Wikipedia policy indicates that all editors should write in as dispassionate, neutral, and objective a manner as possible. This allows the facts to speak for themselves, and allows the reader to draw their own conclusions without being lectured to. As I said above, your edit was very helpful in providing new information on the subject, but it would be helpful if you could go through and tone down your language somewhat. As a guide, perhaps you might like to read this tutorial and the policy guidelines. Thanks. DWaterson 21:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Helwys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply