Talk:Xenosmilus

Mammals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Body length

Just to compare, their principal measurment, length I guess or height if you prefer, what was it?

The article states they were 1.7 to 1.8 meters long, but I agree it is not entirely clear what is meant by this statement. I think, or suspect, it refers to the body length (not height), excluding the tail. At least, this definition of 'length' is used in most similar articles - lion and tiger, for example. DaMatriX (talk) 16:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Book

This is very good source. OJJ (talk) 17:34, 16 October 2016 (UTC)