Help talk:Cite errors

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cite errors page.

• Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
• New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

• Assume good faith
• Be polite and avoid personal attacks
• Be welcoming to newcomers
• Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 30 days 

This help page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:Wikipedia Help High‑importance

	This page is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or and a volunteer will visit you there.
High	This page has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected edit request on 25 June 2024

This edit request to MediaWiki:Cite error references missing group has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The system message has been removed from the Cite extension per gerrit:1008425; it is no longer in use. Please delete it, as well as pages in Special:PrefixIndex/MediaWiki:Cite error references missing group/. Eyesnore ^talk💬 14:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done — xaosflux ^Talk 14:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Spurious "|}}" text

Why is there spurious |}} text in this page, after the ranged TOC? -- Mikeblas (talk) 08:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Mikeblas. This is a centralized discussion for many pages (see banner "Centralized discussions" at the top).

Could you please post a wikilink to the page where you see |}}? —⁠andrybak (talk) 09:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

It was at any page using {{CatAutoTOC}} with a long enough list to develop a TOC. I tried digging into it, but as with everything else at Wikipedia, it's a real jumbled mess of different templates, crazy syntax, and ... Whatever the cause, it seems to have been remedied. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:56, 28 June 2024 (UTC)