IanTEB

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, IanTEB. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Music of 428: Shibuya Scramble and Canaan.
Message added 03:06, 21 October 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:06, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sekai wa Sore demo Kawari wa Shinai

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sekai wa Sore demo Kawari wa Shinai you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 16:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sekai wa Sore demo Kawari wa Shinai

The article Sekai wa Sore demo Kawari wa Shinai you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sekai wa Sore demo Kawari wa Shinai for comments about the article, and Talk:Sekai wa Sore demo Kawari wa Shinai/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 19:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Poison: Iitai Koto mo Ienai Konna Yo no Naka wa

On 4 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Poison: Iitai Koto mo Ienai Konna Yo no Naka wa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Poison" can soothe babies? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Poison: Iitai Koto mo Ienai Konna Yo no Naka wa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Poison: Iitai Koto mo Ienai Konna Yo no Naka wa), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori

On 14 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the lyrics to Gen Hoshino's "Crazy Crazy" references members of the jazz group Crazy Cats through kanji? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 12:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Why Don't You Play in Hell? (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Why Don't You Play in Hell? (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Why Don't You Play in Hell? (song)

The article Why Don't You Play in Hell? (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Why Don't You Play in Hell? (song) and Talk:Why Don't You Play in Hell? (song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Why Don't You Play in Hell? (song)

The article Why Don't You Play in Hell? (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Why Don't You Play in Hell? (song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Why Don't You Play in Hell? (song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baka no Uta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vinyl.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Here is a barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		For your help in the article I Wanna Be Your Ghost! KjjjKjjj (talk) 03:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gag (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gag (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gag (song)

The article Gag (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gag (song) and Talk:Gag (song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gag (song)

The article Gag (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gag (song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Gag (song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 14:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Really pleased for you that we got this to GA status in less than 24 hours; you did not irritate me during the review at all and I've got quite a few GA's up right now if you would consider reviewing any of them please? --K. Peake 07:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

@Kyle Peake: yeah, totally! I'll try to open a review later tonight. IanTEB (talk) 12:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in WP:GARC

Hello, I noticed you have an article listed at WP:GAN. I recently started a project, Good Article Review Circles, and thought you might be interested. This initiative helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you'll review others' articles and get your own reviewed in return. Check out the page for more details! — GMH Melbourne (talk) 14:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori

The article Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori and Talk:Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:04, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cero (band) has been accepted

Cero (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori

The article Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori for comments about the article, and Talk:Crazy Crazy / Sakura no Mori/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Regarding your comments on the FAC review for Windswept Adan

Hello IanTEB! I wanted to preface by expressing my appreciation for your comments on my FAC review; they were very kind and helpful to the further development of the article. I did, however, want to inquire about the Oricon charts - I mentioned not being able to find their charting data myself due to the website's paywall; thus, I did not include the information due to it being unverifiable by most reviewers for now (this may have changed by the time you get to reading this message). At the expense of being a bit redundant in the case that you did read my reply (which was made un-repliable - I'm not sure of the right word here - due to my putting it in an expand box template), is there some external reference with this information that does not require payment? Or would it be acceptable to put the album link on Oricon as the reference, with the expectation that whoever may look at this reference has access to view its chart history? Let me know your thoughts on this. I'd love to include this information, as it would add to the breadth of the article.

That being said, I invite you to conduct an unbiased source review for the nomination! I understand that it would be your first (if not, please correct me), so I will mention that from my understanding the process is similar to a GAN source review with a spot check, albeit more thorough in that it must account for the reliability/verifiability of all sources - for a good example, check out Generalissima's spot check for St Melangell's Church. I would ask more for an impartial review of just the Japanese references, as you seem to be familiar with Japanese music-related sources in particular, and I'm sure most people would be turned off from doing the mandatory spot check due to the number of non-English sources. Of course, this is not obligatory, and you are free to refuse as you wish. Feel free to let me know what you think about this; your insight would be much appreciated! joeyquism (talk) 18:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Just noticed your edit to the page. Thank you very much for this! I think this attribution is appropriate. joeyquism (talk) 18:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Hey! If you ever need any Oricon information in the future you can reach out. I wouldn't mind doing a spotcheck, but I like to get those kind of things done quickly so I'll start when I know I'll have time to finish. This will probably be within a week. My understanding is that FACs can go for quite a long time, so I should definitely be able to get one done in time (unless another editor beats me to it). I wish you all luck on the nomination; coverage of Japanese music isn't exactly perfect on enwiki so I think it's super cool :) IanTEB (talk) 19:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Sounds great, thank you so much! I appreciate the gesture, and greatly appreciate your input considering your experience with these sources (are you a Japanese speaker, perchance? Either way, you seem to know the language much better than I do, so your knowledge is especially valuable). From what I've been told, FACs take around 3-12 weeks, with a preliminary check for readiness at around 3 weeks and final checks for inactivity at 12, so you should have plenty of time.

Thank you for the good luck wishes, and I'm glad you think it's cool! To expand more on your last point, I have yet to see a Japanese music featured article aside from Ayumi Hamasaki and some Final Fantasy soundtracks, so I had no reference for what one looked like when writing this article - although, I did use "Why Don't You Play in Hell?" as a reference, which I realized you wrote! What a well done article! I do wish for more non-American music featured articles in general; I'm aware of some Spanish and Brazilian music FAs, but it's rather lacking elsewhere. Hope you're having an amazing start to your week, and I hope to hear back from you soon! joeyquism (talk) 21:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

I'm not a native speaker but I am able to read sources without translation. As for other featured Japanese music content, I think its limited to Hamasaki and Koda Kumi discography, though Passion (Hikaru Utada song) could have been promoted if it wasn't for a lack of feedback on the nomination. Thanks for your kind words and I'll see you on the FAC! IanTEB (talk) 21:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi IanTEB! Sorry to revive this - I just wanted to say that if you do decide to conduct a Japanese source review, I think it would be a good display of transparency to note that I personally requested you to do so on your talk page, and to also express that you are the one who added the Oricon charts information, which I as the nominator currently do not have access to. Apologies for the policing; I just want any potential review to be as unbiased and transparent as possible so as to not disrupt the neutral aspect of initial FAC reviews. Thank you, and I hope to hear from you again soon! joeyquism (talk) 19:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Of course! IanTEB (talk) 20:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi IanTEB. Thank you for your work on Why (Gen Hoshino song). Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Why are you not autopatrolled? You are consistently creating articles of a very high quality. thanks.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aszx5000 (talk) 18:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi IanTEB, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Elli (talk | contribs) 01:49, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Re: GAN review for Same Thing (EP)

Hi IanTEB! I'm so sorry for having unfulfilled my promise to get your article reviewed in a timely manner. I've been in a bit of a mental rut lately, and have tried to get that cleared by working on other articles instead. I'll put a placeholder on the review shortly; if I don't get to it within, say, the next week and a half, feel free to chastise me on my talk page or elsewhere. Hope you're having a great week so far! joeyquism (talk) 16:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

No need to worry. I've been keeping busy with a done of projects so there's no rush. Hope you have a great week! IanTEB (talk) 17:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi IanTEB! Continuing from your comment on Talk:Same Thing (EP)/GA1 - I do have a nomination for Leak 04-13 (Bait Ones) that's been open for quite a while. It's a bit short, and of course you're not obligated to review it, though I would appreciate it greatly. Thank you again, and keep up the wonderful work! joeyquism (talk) 20:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

I wouldn't mind at all. I'll try to at least get it down before the end of the month! IanTEB (talk) 20:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Same Thing (EP)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Same Thing (EP) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joeyquism -- Joeyquism (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Same Thing (EP)

The article Same Thing (EP) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Same Thing (EP) for comments about the article, and Talk:Same Thing (EP)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Joeyquism -- Joeyquism (talk) 20:41, 4 July 2024 (UTC)